| Literature DB >> 24312128 |
Joshua J Loya1, Henry Jung, Caroline Temmins, Nam Cho, Harminder Singh.
Abstract
Objective. Primary intramedullary spinal germ cell tumors are exceedingly rare. As such, there are no established treatment paradigms. We describe our management for spinal germ cell tumors and a review of the literature. Clinical Presentation. We describe the case of a 45-year-old man with progressive lower extremity weakness and sensory deficits. He was found to have enhancing intramedullary mass lesions in the thoracic spinal cord, and pathology was consistent with an intramedullary germ cell tumor. A video presentation of the case and surgical approach is provided. Conclusion. As spinal cord germinomas are highly sensitive to radiation and chemotherapy, a patient can be spared radical surgery. Diverse treatment approaches exist across institutions. We advocate biopsy followed by local radiation, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, as the optimal treatment for these tumors. Histological findings have prognostic value if syncytiotrophoblastic giant cells (STGCs) are found, which are associated with a higher rate of recurrence. The recurrence rate in STGC-positive spinal germinomas is 33% (2/6), whereas it is only 8% in STGC-negative tumors (2/24). We advocate limited volume radiotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy in patients with high risk of recurrence. To reduce endocrine and neurocognitive side effects, cranio-spinal radiation should be used as a last resort in patients with recurrence.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24312128 PMCID: PMC3838823 DOI: 10.1155/2013/798358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Med
Reported cases of primary spinal germ cell tumors.
| Patient no. | Series | Country | Age/sex | Location | Medullary | Operation | Radiation craniospinal (Gy) | Radiation Local (Gy) | Chemotherapy | HCG | STGC | Followup | Recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | Zhu et al. [ | China | 7/M | T12-L1 | IM | PR | ND | ND | — |
|
| — | — |
| 3 | Slagel et al. [ | Japan | 16/F | T11-L4 | IM, EM | PR | — | 30 | — | — | — | 28 months | NR |
| 4 |
Aoyama et al. [ | Japan | 16/F | T9-T12 | IM | PR | — | 30.6 | Ifosfamide + cisplatin + etoposide |
| — | 3 years | NR |
| 5 | Chute et al. [ | US | 18/M | T6-T8 | IM | Bx | — | 50 | — |
| — | 6 months | NR |
| 6 | Huang et al. [ | US | 18/M | C3-C6 | IM | PR | ND | ND | Bleomycin + cisplatin + etoposide | — | — | 6 months | NR |
| 7 | Kiyuna et al. [ | Japan | 20/F | T11-L3 | EM | TR | 30.4 | 40 | — | — | — | 2 years | NR |
| 8 | Massimino et al. [ | Italy | 20/M | L2 | IM | TR | 30 | 9 | Cisplatin + etoposide + bleomycin |
|
| 33 months | NR |
| 9 | Kinoshita et al. [ | Japan | 21/F | T9-T11, L2-L3 | IM | PR | — | 25.2 | Carboplatin + etoposide | — | — | 3 years | NR |
| 10 | Takahashi et al. [ | Japan | 22/F | L1-L2 | IM, EM | PR | 57 | 30.6 | Ifosfamide + carboplatin or cisplatin + etoposide |
| — | 1.5 years | NR |
| 11 | Yamagata et al. [ | Japan | 24/F | T6-T7 | IM | PR | 25.6 | 19.8 | Ifosfamide + cisplatin + etoposide |
|
| 6 months | NR |
| 12 |
Kawano and Tsujimura [ | Japan | 24/M | L1-L3 | IM, EM | PR | 16 | 40 | — | — | — | ND | NR |
| 13 | Itoh et al. [ | Japan | 24/M | T11-T12 | IM | TR | 24.1 | 52.1 | — | — | — | 13 months | NR |
| 14 | Miyauchi et al. [ | Japan | 24/M | T12-L3 | IM, EM | PR | 15 | 40 | — | — | — | 15 months | NR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 | Ganslandt et al. [ | Germany | 29/M | T12-L4 | IM | TR | 32 | 18.4 | — | — | — | 2 years | NR |
| 19 | Matsuoka et al. [ | Japan | 31/F | T12-L2 | IM | PR | — | 50 | — | — | — | 15 months | NR |
| 20 | Nagasawa et al. [ | Japan | 31/M | Midcervical | IM | — | — | 51 | — | — | — | 40 months | NR |
| 21 | Sasaki et al. [ | Japan | 32/F | T3-T4 | IM | — | 27.5 | 19.8 | Methotrexate + etoposide |
|
| 5 years | NR |
| 22 | Watanabe et al. [ | Japan | 33/F | T1-T3 | IM | PR | — | 30 | Carboplatin + etoposide | ND | — | 1 year | NR |
| 23 | Hata et al. [ | Japan | 33/M | T7-T9 | IM | PR | — | 36 | Carboplatin + etoposide | — | — | 38 months | NR |
| 24 | Yamagata et al. [ | Japan | 33/M | T9-T11 | IM | PR | 24 | — | Cisplatin + etoposide | — | — | 2 years | NR |
| 25 | Hanafusa et al. [ | Japan | 34/F | T10-T11 | IM | TR | 30 | 45 | — | — | — | 24 months | NR |
| 26 | Matsuyama et al. [ | Japan | 34/F | T6-T8 | IM | PR | — | 46 | — | — | — | 12 months | NR |
| 27 | Aoyama et al. [ | Japan | 34/F | T8-T10 | IM | Bx | — | 30.6 | Ifosfamide + cisplatin + etoposide |
| — | 2 years | NR |
| 28 | Nakata et al. [ | Japan | 35/M | T6-T7 | IM | TR | 24 | — | Carboplatin + etoposide |
| — | 2 years | NR |
| 29 | Horvath et al. [ | Japan | 43/M | L1-L2 | EM | TR | 36 | 14 | — | — | — | 8 months | NR |
| 30 | Present case | USA | 45/M | T2-T5 | IM | PR | — | 45 | — | — | — | 22 months | NR |
Bx: biopsy; PR: partial resection; TR: total resection; HCG: β-human chorionic gonadotropin; STGC: syncytiotrophoblastic giant cells; M: male; F: female; R: recurrence; NR: norecurrence; bold font: patients with recurrence; IM: intramedullary; EM: extramedullary.
Figure 1Preoperative thoracic MRI shows three sagittal sequences (T1, T2, and T1 with gadolinium) on the left and an axial (T1 with gadolinium) on the right demonstrating an intramedullary mass between T2 and T5 (arrow).
Figure 2Two-cell pattern of germ cell tumors (hematoxylin and eosin stain).
Figure 3Postoperative MRI at 1-year followup shows 3 sagittal sequences (T1, T2, and T1 with gadolinium) on the left and an axial (T1 with gadolinium) on the right demonstrating no evidence of tumor recurrence.