OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition and psychological distress are often seen in patients with head-and-neck cancer, but little is known about the interrelationships between those two symptoms. The present study examined the relationship between malnutrition and psychological distress in patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer. METHODS: Using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, 99 patients with advanced-stage head-and-neck cancer were screened for nutrition status. The patients were also screened for psychosocial distress (using the Distress Thermometer) and for psychosocial issues (using the Problem Checklist). Any relationship between malnutrition and psychosocial distress was determined by regression and correlation analysis. We also used t-tests to compare distress levels for patients with and without specific nutrition-related symptoms. RESULTS: The study group included 80 men and 19 women [mean age: 58.4 ± 10.9 years (range: 23-85 years)]. The correlation between poorer nutrition status and level of psychological distress was significant r = 0.37 (p < 0.001). Specifically, reduced food intake and symptoms were both positively associated with distress: r = 0.27 and r = 0.29 respectively, both significant at p < 0.01. After controlling for the effects of psychosocial problems and pain, nutrition status remained a significant predictor of distress, explaining 3.8% of the variance in the distress scores of the patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition and symptoms were strongly related to distress in patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer. Our results suggest the need for further research into the complex relationship between nutrition status and distress and into the management of both nutrition and distress in cancer care.
OBJECTIVE:Malnutrition and psychological distress are often seen in patients with head-and-neck cancer, but little is known about the interrelationships between those two symptoms. The present study examined the relationship between malnutrition and psychological distress in patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer. METHODS: Using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, 99 patients with advanced-stage head-and-neck cancer were screened for nutrition status. The patients were also screened for psychosocial distress (using the Distress Thermometer) and for psychosocial issues (using the Problem Checklist). Any relationship between malnutrition and psychosocial distress was determined by regression and correlation analysis. We also used t-tests to compare distress levels for patients with and without specific nutrition-related symptoms. RESULTS: The study group included 80 men and 19 women [mean age: 58.4 ± 10.9 years (range: 23-85 years)]. The correlation between poorer nutrition status and level of psychological distress was significant r = 0.37 (p < 0.001). Specifically, reduced food intake and symptoms were both positively associated with distress: r = 0.27 and r = 0.29 respectively, both significant at p < 0.01. After controlling for the effects of psychosocial problems and pain, nutrition status remained a significant predictor of distress, explaining 3.8% of the variance in the distress scores of the patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Malnutrition and symptoms were strongly related to distress in patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer. Our results suggest the need for further research into the complex relationship between nutrition status and distress and into the management of both nutrition and distress in cancer care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head-and-neck cancer; late effects; malnutrition; psychological distress; screening; symptoms
Authors: Gerald M Devins; Ada Y M Payne; Sophie Lebel; Kenneth Mah; Ruth N F Lee; Jonathan Irish; Janice Wong; Gary M Rodin Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Ben Britton; Kerrie Clover; Lorna Bateman; Cathy Odelli; Karen Wenham; Annette Zeman; Gregory Leigh Carter Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: David I Rosenthal; Tito R Mendoza; Mark S Chambers; Joshua A Asper; Ibrahima Gning; Merrill S Kies; Randal S Weber; Jan S Lewin; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Xin S Wang; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Head Neck Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Peter K C Goon; Margaret A Stanley; Jörg Ebmeyer; Lars Steinsträsser; Tahwinder Upile; Waseem Jerjes; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Martin Görner; Holger H Sudhoff Journal: Head Neck Oncol Date: 2009-10-14
Authors: L E Carlson; M Angen; J Cullum; E Goodey; J Koopmans; L Lamont; J H MacRae; M Martin; G Pelletier; J Robinson; J S A Simpson; M Speca; L Tillotson; B D Bultz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-06-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Gabrielle B Rocque; Richard A Taylor; Aras Acemgil; Xuelin Li; Maria Pisu; Kelly Kenzik; Bradford E Jackson; Karina I Halilova; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Karen Meneses; Yufeng Li; Michelle Y Martin; Carol Chambless; Nedra Lisovicz; Mona Fouad; Edward E Partridge; Elizabeth A Kvale Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Francisco José Sánchez-Torralvo; Victoria Contreras-Bolívar; María Ruiz-Vico; José Abuín-Fernández; Inmaculada González-Almendros; Manuel Barrios; Gabriel Olveira Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Kristen McCarter; Ben Britton; Amanda L Baker; Sean A Halpin; Alison K Beck; Gregory Carter; Chris Wratten; Judith Bauer; Erin Forbes; Debbie Booth; Luke Wolfenden Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alex Molassiotis; Shelley Roberts; Hui Lin Cheng; Henry K F To; Po Shan Ko; Wang Lam; Yuk Fong Lam; Jessica Abbott; Deborah Kiefer; Jasotha Sanmugarajah; Andrea P Marshall Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.234