Literature DB >> 24311318

Individual responses of mother sows to a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain lead to different microbiota composition in their offspring.

I C Starke1, R Pieper, K Neumann, J Zentek, W Vahjen.   

Abstract

Pregnant gilts were fed the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB10415 (SF68) one month before birth of piglets. DNA extracts of sow faeces taken in weekly intervals as well as extracts from the intestine of their offspring during the suckling period at 12 and 26 days of life were analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative PCR. DGGE profiles of faecal bacterial communities from three out of six probiotic-fed sows were distinctly different from the control and other probiotic-fed sows at all time points after probiotic supplementation. The probiotic-fed sows and their offspring were therefore divided into non-responder (n=3) and responder (n=3) groups. The probiotic strain significantly increased faecal lactobacilli cell numbers in mother sows, which could be assigned to a significant increase of Lactobacillus amylovorus and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Responding sows showed a more pronounced increase than non-responding sows. Similarly, suckling piglets from non-responding and responding sows showed numeric and significant differences for different bacterial groups and species. DGGE profiles of suckling piglets from responding sows also grouped more closely than profiles from control animals. Non-metric multiscaling of suckling piglets showed the same tendency for suckling piglets, but not for post-weaning piglets. This study showed that the probiotic E. faecium strain modified the faecal microbiota of sows. This modification is carried over to their offspring, but leads to changes that do not mirror the quantitative composition in the mother sow. Individual variations in the bacterial composition of mother sows before probiotic feed intake may influence the impact of a probiotic in sows and their offspring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DGGE; individuality; microbiota; piglets; probiotics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24311318     DOI: 10.3920/BM2013.0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  17 in total

1.  Potential effect of two Bacillus probiotic strains on performance and fecal microbiota of breeding sows and their piglets.

Authors:  Mireia Saladrigas-García; David Solà-Oriol; Sergi López-Vergé; Matilde D'Angelo; Maria Carmen Collado; Bea Nielsen; Martin Faldyna; José Francisco Pérez; Susana M Martín-Orúe
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Probiotic Treatment Decreases the Number of CD14-Expressing Cells in Porcine Milk Which Correlates with Several Intestinal Immune Parameters in the Piglets.

Authors:  Lydia Scharek-Tedin; Susanne Kreuzer-Redmer; Sven Olaf Twardziok; Bianca Siepert; Robert Klopfleisch; Karsten Tedin; Jürgen Zentek; Robert Pieper
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Dietary inulin affects the intestinal microbiota in sows and their suckling piglets.

Authors:  Nadine Paßlack; Wilfried Vahjen; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Housing Systems Influence Gut Microbiota Composition of Sows but Not of Their Piglets.

Authors:  Tereza Kubasova; Lenka Davidova-Gerzova; Elodie Merlot; Matej Medvecky; Ondrej Polansky; Delphine Gardan-Salmon; Helene Quesnel; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Modulation of piglets' microbiota: differential effects by a high wheat bran maternal diet during gestation and lactation.

Authors:  Julie Leblois; Sébastien Massart; Bing Li; José Wavreille; Jérôme Bindelle; Nadia Everaert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Pretreatment with probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11181 ameliorates necrotic enteritis-induced intestinal barrier injury in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wu; Wenrui Zhen; Yanqiang Geng; Zhong Wang; Yuming Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Impact of early-life events on the susceptibility to Clostridium difficile colonisation and infection in the offspring of the pig.

Authors:  Łukasz M Grześkowiak; Robert Pieper; Hong A Huynh; Simon M Cutting; Wilfried Vahjen; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2018-09-25

8.  The general composition of the faecal virome of pigs depends on age, but not on feeding with a probiotic bacterium.

Authors:  Jana Sachsenröder; Sven O Twardziok; Matthias Scheuch; Reimar Johne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Feeding sows resistant starch during gestation and lactation impacts their faecal microbiota and milk composition but shows limited effects on their progeny.

Authors:  Julie Leblois; Sébastien Massart; Hélène Soyeurt; Clément Grelet; Frédéric Dehareng; Martine Schroyen; Bing Li; José Wavreille; Jérôme Bindelle; Nadia Everaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of selected feed additives to improve growth and health of dairy calves.

Authors:  Luisa F L Salazar; Luis A Nero; Maria E M Campos-Galvão; Cristina S Cortinhas; Tiago S Acedo; Luis F M Tamassia; Karina C Busato; Válber C Morais; Polyana P Rotta; Alex L Silva; Marcos I Marcondes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.