Literature DB >> 24311001

The relationship between millisecond luminescence and fluorescence in tobacco leaves during the induction period.

S Malkin1, W Bilger, U Schreiber.   

Abstract

Millisecond luminescence and fluorescence, from an intact tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf, were measured simultaneously during the induction period, as a function of the time. This was accomplished using a luminescence apparatus which separated out the faster luminescence components by subtraction of the accumulated slow-decaying ones. An antiparallel correlation between the two was observed, but only during a part of the induction period starting with the first fluorescence peak where the fluorescence decreases to a quasi plateau level. During this induction phase, luminescence rose very prominently to a maximum while fluorescence decreased. This correlation fits a linear dependence of the luminescence on the extent of RCs openness, as monitored by the photochemical quenching of the fluorescence. It may be concluded that during this induction phase, all other factors, which modulate luminescence (e.g. membrane potential), have become already steady and that the millisecond delayed luminescence reflects the photochemical reaction in an open center (i.e. with QA oxidized). This is further supported by steady-state experiments in thylakoid membranes. No correlations between luminescence and either momentary (F) or maximum (Fm) fluorescence during later induction phases can be pinpointed with confidence, although a trend of a parallel decrease at certain time intervals can be seen occasionally. Likewise, there is no relationship between the two in the very initial induction phase, during the rise of fluorescence from Fo to Fm, as noted earlier. This lack of correlation is presumably due to the dependence of luminescence on other parameters, which vary during these induction phases. The implications of these observations are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24311001     DOI: 10.1007/BF00027143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Induction kinetics of delayed light emission in spinach chloroplasts.

Authors:  T Mar; J Brebner; G Roy
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-02-17

2.  Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer.

Authors:  U Schreiber; U Schliwa; W Bilger
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A solid-state, portable instrument for measurement of chlorophyll luminescence induction in plants.

Authors:  U Schreiber; U Schliwa
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Studies on the delayed light emission in spinach chloroplasts. II. Participation of primary electron donor and acceptor of photoreaction II in producing the delayed light emission.

Authors:  S Ito; S Kato; A Takamiya
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1971-08-06

5.  Delayed fluorescence and the high-energy state of chloroplasts.

Authors:  C A Wraight; A R Crofts
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1971-04

6.  Studies on the delayed light emission in spinach chloroplasts. I. Nature of two phases in development of the millisecond delayed light emission during intermittent illumination.

Authors:  S Ito; N Murata; A Takamiya
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1971-08-06

7.  Induction patterns of delayed luminescence fromisolated chloroplasts. I. Response of delayed luminescence to changes in the prompt fluorescence yield.

Authors:  S Malkin; J Barber
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1978-06-08

8.  Chlorophyll luminescence as an indicator of stress-induced damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. Effects of heat-stress in isolated chloroplasts.

Authors:  W Bilger; U Schreiber
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction: a personal perspective of the thermal phase, the J-I-P rise.

Authors:  Alexandrina Stirbet
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Shmuel Malkin (1934-2017) : Listening to photosynthesis and making music.

Authors:  Stephen K Herbert; Yona Siderer
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel.

Authors:  Hazem M Kalaji; Gert Schansker; Marian Brestic; Filippo Bussotti; Angeles Calatayud; Lorenzo Ferroni; Vasilij Goltsev; Lucia Guidi; Anjana Jajoo; Pengmin Li; Pasquale Losciale; Vinod K Mishra; Amarendra N Misra; Sergio G Nebauer; Simonetta Pancaldi; Consuelo Penella; Martina Pollastrini; Kancherla Suresh; Eduardo Tambussi; Marcos Yanniccari; Marek Zivcak; Magdalena D Cetner; Izabela A Samborska; Alexandrina Stirbet; Katarina Olsovska; Kristyna Kunderlikova; Henry Shelonzek; Szymon Rusinowski; Wojciech Bąba
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Experimental in vivo measurements of light emission in plants: a perspective dedicated to David Walker.

Authors:  Hazem M Kalaji; Vasilij Goltsev; Karolina Bosa; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev; Reto J Strasser
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Delayed fluorescence in photosynthesis.

Authors:  Vasilij Goltsev; Ivelina Zaharieva; Petko Chernev; Reto J Strasser
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.