AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Muscle mitochondrial function can vary during fasting, but is lower during hyperinsulinaemia in insulin-resistant humans. Ageing and hyperlipidaemia may be the culprits, but the mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesised that (1) insulin would fail to increase mitochondrial oxidative capacity in non-diabetic insulin-resistant young obese humans and in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and (2) reducing NEFA levels would improve insulin sensitivity by raising oxidative capacity and lowering oxidative stress. METHODS: Before and after insulin (4, 40, 100 nmol/l) stimulation, mitochondrial oxidative capacity was measured in permeabilised fibres and isolated mitochondria using high-resolution respirometry, and H2O2 production was assessed fluorimetrically. Tissue-specific insulin sensitivity was measured with hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamps combined with stable isotopes. To test the second hypothesis, in a 1-day randomised, crossover study, 15 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited via local advertisement were assessed for eligibility. Nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (BMI <35 kg/m(2); age <65 years) and were allocated to and completed the intervention, including oral administration of 750 mg placebo or acipimox. Blinded randomisation was performed by the pharmacy; all participants, researchers performing the measurements and those assessing study outcomes were blinded. The main outcome measures were insulin sensitivity, oxidative capacity and oxidative stress. RESULTS:Insulin sensitivity and mitochondrial oxidative capacity were ~31% and ~21% lower in the obese groups than in the lean group. The obese participants also exhibited blunted substrate oxidation upon insulin stimulation. In the patients with type 2 diabetes, acipimox improved insulin sensitivity by ~27% and reduced H2O2 production by ~45%, but did not improve basal or insulin-stimulated mitochondrial oxidative capacity. No harmful treatment side effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Decreased mitochondrial oxidative capacity can also occur independently of age in insulin-resistant young obese humans. Insulin resistance is present at the muscle mitochondrial level, and is not affected by reducing circulating NEFAs in type 2 diabetes. Thus, impaired plasticity of mitochondrial function is an intrinsic phenomenon that probably occurs independently of lipotoxicity and reduced glucose uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00943059 FUNDING: This study was funded in part by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.).
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Muscle mitochondrial function can vary during fasting, but is lower during hyperinsulinaemia in insulin-resistant humans. Ageing and hyperlipidaemia may be the culprits, but the mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesised that (1) insulin would fail to increase mitochondrial oxidative capacity in non-diabetic insulin-resistant young obesehumans and in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and (2) reducing NEFA levels would improve insulin sensitivity by raising oxidative capacity and lowering oxidative stress. METHODS: Before and after insulin (4, 40, 100 nmol/l) stimulation, mitochondrial oxidative capacity was measured in permeabilised fibres and isolated mitochondria using high-resolution respirometry, and H2O2 production was assessed fluorimetrically. Tissue-specific insulin sensitivity was measured with hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamps combined with stable isotopes. To test the second hypothesis, in a 1-day randomised, crossover study, 15 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited via local advertisement were assessed for eligibility. Nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (BMI <35 kg/m(2); age <65 years) and were allocated to and completed the intervention, including oral administration of 750 mg placebo or acipimox. Blinded randomisation was performed by the pharmacy; all participants, researchers performing the measurements and those assessing study outcomes were blinded. The main outcome measures were insulin sensitivity, oxidative capacity and oxidative stress. RESULTS:Insulin sensitivity and mitochondrial oxidative capacity were ~31% and ~21% lower in the obese groups than in the lean group. The obeseparticipants also exhibited blunted substrate oxidation upon insulin stimulation. In the patients with type 2 diabetes, acipimox improved insulin sensitivity by ~27% and reduced H2O2 production by ~45%, but did not improve basal or insulin-stimulated mitochondrial oxidative capacity. No harmful treatment side effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Decreased mitochondrial oxidative capacity can also occur independently of age in insulin-resistant young obesehumans. Insulin resistance is present at the muscle mitochondrial level, and is not affected by reducing circulating NEFAs in type 2 diabetes. Thus, impaired plasticity of mitochondrial function is an intrinsic phenomenon that probably occurs independently of lipotoxicity and reduced glucose uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00943059 FUNDING: This study was funded in part by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.).
Authors: Attila Brehm; Martin Krssak; Albrecht I Schmid; Peter Nowotny; Werner Waldhäusl; Michael Roden Journal: Diabetes Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: V B Schrauwen-Hinderling; M E Kooi; M K C Hesselink; J A L Jeneson; W H Backes; C J A van Echteld; J M A van Engelshoven; M Mensink; P Schrauwen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Craig S Stump; Kevin R Short; Maureen L Bigelow; Jill M Schimke; K Sreekumaran Nair Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-06-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hideo Makimura; Takara L Stanley; Caroline Suresh; Ana Luisa De Sousa-Coelho; Walter R Frontera; Stephanie Syu; Laurie R Braun; Sara E Looby; Meghan N Feldpausch; Martin Torriani; Hang Lee; Mary-Elizabeth Patti; Steven K Grinspoon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Melanie Cree-Green; Abhinav Gupta; Gregory V Coe; Amy D Baumgartner; Laura Pyle; Jane E B Reusch; Mark S Brown; Bradley R Newcomer; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: D Samocha-Bonet; V D Dixit; C R Kahn; R L Leibel; X Lin; M Nieuwdorp; K H Pietiläinen; R Rabasa-Lhoret; M Roden; P E Scherer; S Klein; E Ravussin Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Esther Phielix; Paul Begovatz; Sofiya Gancheva; Alessandra Bierwagen; Esther Kornips; Gert Schaart; Matthijs K C Hesselink; Patrick Schrauwen; Michael Roden Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-11-01
Authors: Tineke van de Weijer; Esther Phielix; Lena Bilet; Evan G Williams; Eduardo R Ropelle; Alessandra Bierwagen; Roshan Livingstone; Peter Nowotny; Lauren M Sparks; Sabina Paglialunga; Julia Szendroedi; Bas Havekes; Norman Moullan; Eija Pirinen; Jong-Hee Hwang; Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling; Matthijs K C Hesselink; Johan Auwerx; Michael Roden; Patrick Schrauwen Journal: Diabetes Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Ana Elena Peredo-Escárcega; Verónica Guarner-Lans; Israel Pérez-Torres; Sergio Ortega-Ocampo; Elizabeth Carreón-Torres; Vicente Castrejón-Tellez; Eulises Díaz-Díaz; María Esther Rubio-Ruiz Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2015-11-01 Impact factor: 2.629