Literature DB >> 24310171

Health research and systems' governance are at risk: should the right to data protection override health?

C T Di Iorio, F Carinci, J Oderkirk.   

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Data Protection Regulation will have profound implications for public health, health services research and statistics in Europe. The EU Commission's Proposal was a breakthrough in balancing privacy rights and rights to health and healthcare. The European Parliament, however, has proposed extensive amendments. This paper reviews the amendments proposed by the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and their implications for health research and statistics. The amendments eliminate most innovations brought by the Proposal. Notably, derogation to the general prohibition of processing sensitive data shall be allowed for public interests such as the management of healthcare services,but not health research, monitoring, surveillance and governance. The processing of personal health data for historical, statistical or scientific purposes shall be allowed only with the consent of the data subject or if the processing serves an exceptionally high public interest, cannot be performed otherwise and is legally authorised. Research, be it academic, government,corporate or market research, falls under the same rule.The proposed amendments will make difficult or render impossible research and statistics involving the linkage and analysis of the wealth of data from clinical,administrative, insurance and survey sources, which have contributed to improving health outcomes and health systems performance and governance; and may illegitimise efforts that have been made in some European countries to enable privacy-respectful data use for research and statistical purposes. If the amendments stand as written, the right to privacy is likely to override the right to health and healthcare in Europe.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24310171     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach.

Authors:  Menno Mostert; Annelien L Bredenoord; Monique C I H Biesaart; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Big data and biomedical informatics: a challenging opportunity.

Authors:  R Bellazzi
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-05-22

Review 3.  Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation.

Authors:  Mahsa Shabani; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Population attitudes towards research use of health care registries: a population-based survey in Finland.

Authors:  Katariina Eloranta; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Is the Definition of Roma an Important Matter? The Parallel Application of Self and External Classification of Ethnicity in a Population-Based Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Eszter Anna Janka; Ferenc Vincze; Róza Ádány; János Sándor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Jm Laurijssen; Rieke van der Graaf; Wouter B van Dijk; Ewoud Schuit; Rolf Hh Groenwold; Diederick E Grobbee; Martine C de Vries
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.599

7.  Young people's views about the purpose and composition of research ethics committees: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.

Authors:  Suzanne Audrey; Lindsey Brown; Rona Campbell; Andy Boyd; John Macleod
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.