Literature DB >> 24310073

Effect of hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide and hypoxanthine-1(N)-oxide on central nervous excitation of the black tetraGymnocorymbus ternetzi (Characidae, Ostariophysi, Pisces) indicated by dorsal light response.

W Pfeiffer1, G Riegelbauer, G Meier, B Scheibler.   

Abstract

The change of state in the central nervous system ofGymnocorymbus ternetzi after detection of hypoxanthine-l(N)-oxide, hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide, and of the alarm substance from conspecifics was measured quantitatively by means of the fishes' equilibrium behavior. The fish swam freely in a tiny cage, illuminated horizontally from one side. The change of the angle of inclination of the dorsoventral axis of the fish was registered by means of a videorecorder. The recordings were later measured on the monitor in single frames at 0.2-sec intervals where the equilibrium position of the fish could be accurately determined ± 1 °. Various substances were presented to the fish, and their effects upon equilibrium position were recorded. An enhanced optical alertness shown by an increase in the fishes' inclination was generally produced with alarm substance. Without any additional stimulation, the factorU, representing quantitatively the degree of the change of central state, varied slightly within the experimental period of 1 min; however, this factor never exceededU= 1.0 ± 0.15 in control fish. The increase ofU usually exceeded considerably the value 1.15 when skin extract from conspecifics or 7-8 μg of hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide were given. However, when hypoxanthine-l (N)-oxide was presented,U generally did not exceed 1.15. The difference between hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide and hypoxanthine-l(N)-oxide was highly significant. This result is in accordance with the findings on fish schools ofDanio malabaricus, where hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide elicited the fright reaction, but hypoxanthine-1(N)-oxide was ineffective. The results support the hypothesis that the alarm substance from the skin ofPhoxinus phoxinus is identical with hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide. The results with alarm substance or hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide did not show any adaptation. This was also true in fish that were stimulated repeatedly at intervals of a couple of minutes only. InGymnocorymbus, which has compensated for removal of the otolith of one utriculus, conspecific skin extract triggers the typical postoperative phenomenon, i.e., rotation around the fishes' long axis towards the operated side. Whereas such a decompensation could be elicited by hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide as well, hypoxanthine-l(N)-oxide had no effect. This finding is interpreted as an effect of the alarm substance and of hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide on the centers of equilibrium.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 24310073     DOI: 10.1007/BF00989562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  4 in total

1.  Alarm substances.

Authors:  W PFEIFFER
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1963-03-15

2.  The fright reaction of fish.

Authors:  W PFEIFFER
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1962-11

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  E V HOLST
Journal:  Z Vgl Physiol       Date:  1948

Review 4.  [The alarm reaction in fishes and tadpoles].

Authors:  W Pfeiffer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1966-11
  4 in total
  17 in total

1.  Predator-prey interactions and changing environments: who benefits?

Authors:  Mark V Abrahams; Marc Mangel; Kevin Hedges
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Neural processing, perception, and behavioral responses to natural chemical stimuli by fish and crustaceans.

Authors:  Charles D Derby; Peter W Sorensen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Neural mechanisms of alarm pheromone signaling.

Authors:  Anders Enjin; Greg Seong-Bae Suh
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 4.  Theory and Application of Semiochemicals in Nuisance Fish Control.

Authors:  Peter W Sorensen; Nicholas S Johnson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Field verification of predator attraction to minnow alarm substance.

Authors:  Brian D Wisenden; Travis A Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Zebrafish antipredatory responses: a future for translational research?

Authors:  Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Epidermal 'alarm substance' cells of fishes maintained by non-alarm functions: possible defence against pathogens, parasites and UVB radiation.

Authors:  Douglas P Chivers; Brian D Wisenden; Carrie J Hindman; Tracy A Michalak; Robin C Kusch; Susan G W Kaminskyj; Kristin L Jack; Maud C O Ferrari; Robyn J Pollock; Colin F Halbgewachs; Michael S Pollock; Shireen Alemadi; Clayton T James; Rachel K Savaloja; Cameron P Goater; Amber Corwin; Reehan S Mirza; Joseph M Kiesecker; Grant E Brown; James C Adrian; Patrick H Krone; Andrew R Blaustein; Alicia Mathis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The synthetic substance hypoxanthine 3-N-oxide elicits alarm reactions in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Kevin V Parra; James C Adrian; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Nitrogen oxides elicit antipredator responses in juvenile channel catfish, but not in convict cichlids or rainbow trout: conservation of the ostariophysan alarm pheromone.

Authors:  Grant E Brown; James C Adrian; Nabil T Naderi; Mark C Harvey; Jocelyn M Kelly
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  The role of olfaction in chemosensory-based predator recognition in the fathead minnow,Pimephales promelas.

Authors:  D P Chivers; R J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.