| Literature DB >> 24309949 |
J Myers1.
Abstract
The 1932 papers of Emerson and Arnold were great ones, both conceptually and experimentally. The results were so far out of synch with the thinking of the times that it took many years for them to become a cozy part of the dogma of photosynthesis. I reflect on this twenty-four year segment of history.Year: 1994 PMID: 24309949 DOI: 10.1007/BF00034780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Photosynth Res ISSN: 0166-8595 Impact factor: 3.573