Dolly A John1, David R Williams. 1. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: djohn@hsph.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asian Americans experience significant underuse of mental health treatment. Religious clergy and spiritual advisors play a critical role in delivering mental health care in the United States. Limited knowledge exists about their use among Asian Americans. OBJECTIVE: We describe mental health service use from a religious/spiritual advisor among Asian Americans. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2095 respondents in the 2002-2003 National Latino and Asian American Study. RESULTS: Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of mental health service use from a religious/spiritual advisor (5.5% and 1% overall, respectively) was generally higher among U.S.-born Asians and those with a 12-month mental disorder (23.6% and 7.5%, respectively). Religious/spiritual advisors were seen by 35% of treatment-seeking Asian Americans with a lifetime mental disorder. They were seen as commonly as psychiatrists but less commonly than a mental health specialist or general medical provider. Approximately 70% of those seeking treatment had a mental disorder, significant proportions of whom sought treatment in the absence of a psychiatrist, a mental health specialist or even a healthcare provider. A significant majority with 12-month use perceived the care as helpful, felt accepted/understood and satisfied (71-86%). However, only 31% rated the care as excellent, 28% quit completing care, and referral rates for specialty mental health treatment were low, even among those with a mental disorder (9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Religious/spiritual advisors are a key source of treatment-seeking for Asian Americans with a mental disorder. Quality of care and low referral rates for specialty mental health treatment warrant further attention and need for increased collaboration with the mental health system.
BACKGROUND: Asian Americans experience significant underuse of mental health treatment. Religious clergy and spiritual advisors play a critical role in delivering mental health care in the United States. Limited knowledge exists about their use among Asian Americans. OBJECTIVE: We describe mental health service use from a religious/spiritual advisor among Asian Americans. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2095 respondents in the 2002-2003 National Latino and Asian American Study. RESULTS: Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of mental health service use from a religious/spiritual advisor (5.5% and 1% overall, respectively) was generally higher among U.S.-born Asians and those with a 12-month mental disorder (23.6% and 7.5%, respectively). Religious/spiritual advisors were seen by 35% of treatment-seeking Asian Americans with a lifetime mental disorder. They were seen as commonly as psychiatrists but less commonly than a mental health specialist or general medical provider. Approximately 70% of those seeking treatment had a mental disorder, significant proportions of whom sought treatment in the absence of a psychiatrist, a mental health specialist or even a healthcare provider. A significant majority with 12-month use perceived the care as helpful, felt accepted/understood and satisfied (71-86%). However, only 31% rated the care as excellent, 28% quit completing care, and referral rates for specialty mental health treatment were low, even among those with a mental disorder (9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Religious/spiritual advisors are a key source of treatment-seeking for Asian Americans with a mental disorder. Quality of care and low referral rates for specialty mental health treatment warrant further attention and need for increased collaboration with the mental health system.
Authors: Steven G Heeringa; James Wagner; Myriam Torres; Naihua Duan; Terry Adams; Patricia Berglund Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Jennifer Abe-Kim; David T Takeuchi; Seunghye Hong; Nolan Zane; Stanley Sue; Michael S Spencer; Hoa Appel; Ethel Nicdao; Margarita Alegría Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Olga Demler; Richard G Frank; Mark Olfson; Harold Alan Pincus; Ellen E Walters; Philip Wang; Kenneth B Wells; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David T Takeuchi; Nolan Zane; Seunghye Hong; David H Chae; Fang Gong; Gilbert C Gee; Emily Walton; Stanley Sue; Margarita Alegría Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Philip S Wang; Olga Demler; Mark Olfson; Harold A Pincus; Kenneth B Wells; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 19.242
Authors: Vivianne Kovess-Masfety; Sara Evans-Lacko; David Williams; Laura Helena Andrade; Corina Benjet; Margreet Ten Have; Klaas Wardenaar; Elie G Karam; Ronny Bruffaerts; Jibril Abdumalik; Josep Maria Haro Abad; Silvia Florescu; Benjamin Wu; Peter De Jonge; Yasmina Altwaijri; Hristo Hinkov; Norito Kawakami; Jose Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Evelyn Bromet; Giovanni de Girolamo; José Posada-Villa; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Yueqin Huang; Chiyi Hu; Maria Carmen Viana; John Fayyad; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Koen Demyttenaere; Jean-Pierre Lepine; Samuel Murphy; Miguel Xavier; Tadashi Takeshima; Oye Gureje Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 4.328