Literature DB >> 24308028

Establishing intra- and inter-rater agreement of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale for evaluating pain in toddlers during immunization.

Rebecca J Gomez, Nick Barrowman, Sonja Elia, Elizabeth Manias, Jenny Royle, Denise Harrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale is a five-item tool that was developed to assess postoperative pain in young children. The tool is frequently used as an outcome measure in studies investigating acute procedural pain in young children; however, there are limited published psychometric data in this context.
OBJECTIVE: To establish inter-rater and intrarater agreement of the FLACC scale in toddlers during immunization.
METHODS: Participants comprised a convenience sample of toddlers recruited from an immunization drop-in service, who were part of a larger pilot randomized controlled trial. Toddlers were video- and audiotaped during immunization procedures. The first rater scored each video twice in random order over a period of three weeks (intrarater agreement), while the second rater scored each video once and was blinded to the first rater's scores (inter-rater agreement). The FLACC scale was scored at four timepoints throughout the procedure. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement of the FLACC scale.
RESULTS: Thirty toddlers between 12 and 18 months of age were recruited, and video data were available for 29. Intrarater agreement coefficients were 0.88 at baseline, 0.97 at insertion of first needle, and 0.80 and 0.81 at 15 s and 30 s following the final injection, respectively. Inter-rater coefficients were 0.40 at baseline, 0.95 at insertion of first needle, and 0.81 and 0.78 at 15 s and 30 s following the final injection, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The FLACC scale has sufficient agreement in assessing pain in toddlers during immunizations, especially during the most painful periods of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24308028      PMCID: PMC3917803          DOI: 10.1155/2013/897104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Res Manag        ISSN: 1203-6765            Impact factor:   3.037


  28 in total

1.  Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain.

Authors:  P E Bijur; W Silver; E J Gallagher
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 2.  Pediatric pain, tools, and assessment.

Authors:  S Merkel; S Malviya
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.084

3.  Correlation in restricted ranges of data.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-03-11

4.  The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Terri Voepel-Lewis; Sandy Merkel; Alan R Tait; Agnieszka Trzcinka; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  The patient vs. caregiver perception of acute pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  V Guru; I Dubinsky
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 6.  Making vaccines more acceptable--methods to prevent and minimize pain and other common adverse events associated with vaccines.

Authors:  R M Jacobson; A Swan; A Adegbenro; S L Ludington; P C Wollan; G A Poland
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Evaluation of the reliability, validity and practicality of 3 measures of acute pain in infants undergoing immunization injections.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Mary-Ellen Hogan; Paul Moyer; Angela Girgis; Sandra Gerges; Linda Wang; Moshe Ipp
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale.

Authors:  Renee C B Manworren; Linda S Hynan
Journal:  Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

9.  Does nebulized lidocaine reduce the pain and distress of nasogastric tube insertion in young children? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Franz E Babl; Christopher Goldfinch; Christine Mandrawa; Dianne Crellin; Ronan O'Sullivan; Susan Donath
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Terri Voepel-Lewis; Jennifer Zanotti; Jennifer A Dammeyer; Sandra Merkel
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.228

View more
  5 in total

1.  Behavioral Strategies to Minimize Procedural Distress During In-Office Pediatric Tympanostomy Tube Placement Without Sedation or Restraint.

Authors:  Lindsey L Cohen; Abigail S Robbertz; Laura J England
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2021-08-31

2.  Difficulties with assessment and management of an infant's distress in the postoperative period: Optimising opportunities for interdisciplinary information-sharing.

Authors:  Carlye Weiner; Sueann Penrose; Elizabeth Manias; Noel Cranswick; Ellie Rosenfeld; Fiona Newall; Allison Williams; Narelle Borrott; Sharon Kinney
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-14

3.  Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.

Authors:  Yujiro Matsuishi; Haruhiko Hoshino; Nobutake Shimojo; Yuki Enomoto; Takahiro Kido; Tetsuya Hoshino; Masahiko Sumitani; Yoshiaki Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.

Authors:  Dianne Crellin; Denise Harrison; Nick Santamaria; Franz E Babl
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months.

Authors:  Dianne J Crellin; Denise Harrison; Adrian Hutchinson; Tibor Schuster; Nick Santamaria; Franz E Babl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.