Young Ho Lee1, Gwan Gyu Song. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We assessed the efficacy and safety of bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: We surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy and safety of bosentan in patients with PAH using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). RESULTS: Meta-analysis of seven RCTs including a total of 410 patients and 296 controls revealed that the 6-minute work distance was significantly higher in the bosentan group than in the placebo group (WMD, 46.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.20 to 71.19; p = 2.9 × 10(-5)). Compared with the placebo, bosentan significantly reduced the mean pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with PAH (WMD, -6.026; 95% CI, -8.785 to -3.268, p = 1.8 × 10(-6)). The bosentan therapy group worsened less clinically than the placebo group (OR, 0.252; 95% CI, 0.140 to 0.454; p = 4.6 × 10(-7)). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the bosentan and placebo groups (OR, 0.948; 95% CI, 0.556 to 1.614; p = 0.843). However, the results of the abnormal liver function test (LFT) were significantly higher in the bosentan group than in the placebo group (OR, 2.312; 95% CI, 1.020 to 5.241; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that bosentan can treat PAH effectively. However, bosentan increased the incidence of abnormal LFT results compared with the placebo.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We assessed the efficacy and safety of bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: We surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy and safety of bosentan in patients with PAH using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). RESULTS: Meta-analysis of seven RCTs including a total of 410 patients and 296 controls revealed that the 6-minute work distance was significantly higher in the bosentan group than in the placebo group (WMD, 46.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.20 to 71.19; p = 2.9 × 10(-5)). Compared with the placebo, bosentan significantly reduced the mean pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with PAH (WMD, -6.026; 95% CI, -8.785 to -3.268, p = 1.8 × 10(-6)). The bosentan therapy group worsened less clinically than the placebo group (OR, 0.252; 95% CI, 0.140 to 0.454; p = 4.6 × 10(-7)). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the bosentan and placebo groups (OR, 0.948; 95% CI, 0.556 to 1.614; p = 0.843). However, the results of the abnormal liver function test (LFT) were significantly higher in the bosentan group than in the placebo group (OR, 2.312; 95% CI, 1.020 to 5.241; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that bosentan can treat PAH effectively. However, bosentan increased the incidence of abnormal LFT results compared with the placebo.
Authors: M Humbert; R J Barst; I M Robbins; R N Channick; N Galiè; A Boonstra; L J Rubin; E M Horn; A Manes; G Simonneau Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Lewis J Rubin; David B Badesch; Robyn J Barst; Nazzareno Galie; Carol M Black; Anne Keogh; Tomas Pulido; Adaani Frost; Sebastien Roux; Isabelle Leconte; Michael Landzberg; Gerald Simonneau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Alan L Hinderliter; Adam Torbicki; Thierry Fourme; Gerald Simonneau; Tomas Pulido; Nilda Espinola-Zavaleta; Guido Rocchi; Alessandra Manes; Robert Frantz; Marcin Kurzyna; Sherif F Nagueh; Robyn Barst; Richard Channick; Karl Dujardin; Andrew Kronenberg; Isabelle Leconte; Maurizio Rainisio; Lewis Rubin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Neil Davie; Stephen J Haleen; Paul D Upton; Julia M Polak; Magdi H Yacoub; Nicholas W Morrell; John Wharton Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405