Literature DB >> 24307697

Local transplantation of granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34+ cells for patients with femoral and tibial nonunion: pilot clinical trial.

Ryosuke Kuroda1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Takahiro Niikura, Yohei Kawakami, Tomoaki Fukui, Sang Yang Lee, Yutaka Mifune, Shin Kawamata, Masanori Fukushima, Takayuki Asahara, Atsuhiko Kawamoto, Masahiro Kurosaka.   

Abstract

Most bone fractures typically heal, although a significant proportion (5%-10%) of fractures fail to heal, resulting in delayed union or persistent nonunion. Some preclinical evidence shows the therapeutic potential of peripheral blood CD34(+) cells, a hematopoietic/endothelial progenitor cell-enriched population, for bone fracture healing; however, clinical outcome following transplantation of CD34(+) cells in patients with fracture has never been reported. We report a phase I/IIa clinical trial regarding transplantation of autologous, granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34(+) cells with atelocollagen scaffold for patients with femoral or tibial fracture nonunion (n = 7). The primary endpoint of this study is radiological fracture healing (union) by evaluating anteroposterior and lateral views at week 12 following cell therapy. For the safety evaluation, incidence, severity, and outcome of all adverse events were recorded. Radiological fracture healing at week 12 was achieved in five of seven cases (71.4%), which was greater than the threshold (18.1%) predefined by the historical outcome of the standard of care. The interval between cell transplantation and union, the secondary endpoint, was 12.6 ± 5.4 weeks (range, 8-24 weeks) for clinical healing and 16.1 ± 10.2 weeks (range, 8-36 weeks) for radiological healing. Neither deaths nor life-threatening adverse events were observed during the 1-year follow-up after the cell therapy. These results suggest feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of CD34(+) cell therapy in patients with nonunion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD34+ cells; Clinical trial; G-CSF; Nonunion; Peripheral blood

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24307697      PMCID: PMC3902290          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  32 in total

1.  Autologous marrow injection as a substitute for operative grafting of tibial nonunions.

Authors:  J F Connolly; R Guse; J Tiedeman; R Dehne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Osteoblast precursor cells are found in CD34+ cells from human bone marrow.

Authors:  J L Chen; P Hunt; M McElvain; T Black; S Kaufman; E S Choi
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Mesenchymal stem cells derived from CD133-positive cells in mobilized peripheral blood and cord blood: proliferation, Oct4 expression, and plasticity.

Authors:  Tatiana Tondreau; Nathalie Meuleman; Alain Delforge; Marielle Dejeneffe; Rita Leroy; Martine Massy; Christine Mortier; Dominique Bron; Laurence Lagneaux
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions. Influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; A Poignard; F Beaujean; H Rouard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Expression of human bone-related proteins in the hematopoietic microenvironment.

Authors:  M W Long; J L Williams; K G Mann
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization.

Authors:  T Asahara; H Masuda; T Takahashi; C Kalka; C Pastore; M Silver; M Kearne; M Magner; J M Isner
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Percutaneous bone marrow grafting for the treatment of tibial non-union.

Authors:  Ashok Goel; S S Sangwan; R C Siwach; Ahmad M Ali
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis.

Authors:  T Asahara; T Murohara; A Sullivan; M Silver; R van der Zee; T Li; B Witzenbichler; G Schatteman; J M Isner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization.

Authors:  T Takahashi; C Kalka; H Masuda; D Chen; M Silver; M Kearney; M Magner; J M Isner; T Asahara
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Concepts of fracture union, delayed union, and nonunion.

Authors:  D Marsh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Clinical impact of circulating CD34-positive cells on bone regeneration and healing.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Yohei Kawakami; Tomoaki Fukui; Yutaka Mifune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Stem and progenitor cells: advancing bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Tevlin; G G Walmsley; O Marecic; Michael S Hu; D C Wan; M T Longaker
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Efficient derivation of osteoprogenitor cells from induced pluripotent stem cells for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Dogaki; Sang Yang Lee; Takahiro Niikura; Takashi Iwakura; Etsuko Okumachi; Takahiro Waki; Kenichiro Kakutani; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Alexander M Tatara; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Non-union bone fracture: a quicker fix.

Authors:  David Holmes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Current and future uses of skeletal stem cells for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Guo-Ping Xu; Xiang-Feng Zhang; Lu Sun; Er-Man Chen
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 7.  Tissue-specific endothelial cells: a promising approach for augmentation of soft tissue repair in orthopedics.

Authors:  Amir Lebaschi; Yusuke Nakagawa; Susumu Wada; Guang-Ting Cong; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Recent advances in bone regeneration using adult stem cells.

Authors:  Hadar Zigdon-Giladi; Utai Rudich; Gal Michaeli Geller; Ayelet Evron
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

9.  Targeted delivery of mesenchymal stem cells to the bone.

Authors:  Wei Yao; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Strategies to Stimulate Mobilization and Homing of Endogenous Stem and Progenitor Cells for Bone Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Marietta Herrmann; Sophie Verrier; Mauro Alini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.