Literature DB >> 24307502

Perioperative only versus extended antimicrobial usage in tympanomastoid surgery: a randomized trial.

Vijay G Bidkar1, Roshan R Jalisatigi, Ashok S Naik, Raghunath D Shanbag, Rashmi Siddappa, Poorvi V Sharma, Harihar V Hegde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is still a matter of debate in ear surgeries. Previous studies have focused on prophylaxis in middle ear surgery alone without inclusion of mastoidectomy. We therefore investigated efficacy of two regimes of antimicrobial prophylaxis in tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy done for mild middle ear disease in chronic otitis media. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
METHODS: Patients undergoing tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy were included and randomized into two study groups. The group I patients received parenteral perioperative antimicrobials; only group II patients received additional extended oral antimicrobials for 8 days more postoperatively. Primary outcomes evaluated were postaural wound infection and graft success, assessed weekly until 1 month. Adverse events and length of hospital stay were evaluated as secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were randomized into group I (n = 39) and group II (n = 39). The two groups showed no difference in wound infection rate. The graft success rate in both the group was comparable (94.87% in group I and 97.44% in group II, respectively; P = 1.00). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer (P = 0.00001) in group II (3.05 [0.72], mean [SD]) as compared to group I (2.36 [0.49]). During the first postoperative week, a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal disturbances were observed in group II (19 [48.72%] as compared to 1 [2.56%] in group I, P = 0.00001).
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that there is no need of extended antimicrobial prophylaxis for tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy done for mild middle ear disease. An indiscriminate use of antimicrobials may lead to increase incidence of adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prophylaxis; otitis media; surgical wound infection; tympanoplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24307502     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of Prolonged vs Short Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Ear, Nose, Throat, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martinus C Oppelaar; Christian Zijtveld; Saskia Kuipers; Jaap Ten Oever; Jimmie Honings; Willem Weijs; Heiman F L Wertheim
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Early and late surgical site infections in ear surgery.

Authors:  P L Bastier; C Leroyer; A Lashéras; A-M Rogues; V Darrouzet; V Franco-Vidal
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children Undergoing Dental, Maxillo-Facial or Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.

Authors:  Erika Rigotti; Sonia Bianchini; Laura Nicoletti; Sara Monaco; Elena Carrara; Francesca Opri; Roberta Opri; Caterina Caminiti; Daniele Donà; Mario Giuffré; Alessandro Inserra; Laura Lancella; Alessandro Mugelli; Giorgio Piacentini; Nicola Principi; Simonetta Tesoro; Elisabetta Venturini; Annamaria Staiano; Alberto Villani; Enrico Sesenna; Claudio Vicini; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.