Literature DB >> 24307086

[Legal ramifications of medical end-of-life decisions in dementia--orientational certainty through the latest decisions of the German Supreme Court?].

T Kratz1, R Vogel, J Eberling, M Tröster.   

Abstract

Taking care of dying people is one of the most difficult obligations of the physician, especially if these patients are suffering from dementia and accordingly when their current capacity to consent is arguable. In this field, numerous ethical and forensic problems arise that have to be considered. Legal medical end-of-life decisions that potentially shorten life (Sterbehilfe) are divided into two categories: direct "Sterbehilfe" refers to stopping life-prolonging measures. Indirect "Sterbehilfe" describes the use of agents to alleviate symptoms of a terminally ill patient which may however, shorten life expectancy. A physician terminating a patient's life based on his own decision and authority of action always acts illegally. This paper describes the current discussion on this issue in Germany considering the medical and legal aspects of it while focussing on patients suffering from dementia and their ability to form and to articulate their own will. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24307086     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1355924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr        ISSN: 0720-4299            Impact factor:   0.752


  1 in total

1.  Existential decision-making in a fatal progressive disease: how much do legal and medical frameworks matter?

Authors:  Christian Weber; Barbara Fijalkowska; Katarzyna Ciecwierska; Anna Lindblad; Gisela Badura-Lotter; Peter M Andersen; Magdalena Kuźma-Kozakiewicz; Albert C Ludolph; Dorothée Lulé; Tomasz Pasierski; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.