Literature DB >> 24306562

Comparative study of reaction centers from purple photosynthetic bacteria: Isolation and optical spectroscopy.

S Wang1, S Lin, X Lin, N W Woodbury, J P Allen.   

Abstract

Reaction centers from two species of purple bacteria, Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodospirillum centenum, have been characterized and compared to reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus. The reaction centers purified from these four species can be divided into two classes according to the spectral characteristics of the primary donor. Reaction centers from one class have a donor optical band at a longer wavelength, 865 nm compared to 850 nm, and an optical absorption band associated with the oxidized donor at 1250 nm that has a larger oscillator strength than reaction centers from the second class. Under normal buffering conditions, reaction centers isolated from Rb. sphaeroides and Rs. rubrum exhibit characteristics of the first class while those from Rb. capsulatus and Rs. centenum exhibit characteristics of the second class. However, the reaction centers can be converted between the two groups by the addition of charged detergents. Thus, the observed spectral differences are not due to intrinsic differences between reaction centers but represent changes in the electronic structure of the donor due to interactions with the detergents as has been confirmed by recent ENDOR measurements (Rautter J, Lendzian F, Lubitz W, Wang S and Allen JP (1994) Biochemistry 33: 12077-12084). The oxidation midpoint potential for the donor has values of 445 mV, 475 mV, 480 mV and 495 mV for Rs. rubrum, Rs. centenum, Rb. capsulatus, and Rb. sphaeroides, respectively. Despite this range of values for the midpoint potential, the decay rates of the stimulated emission are all fast with values of 4.1 ps, 4.5 ps. 5.5 ps and 6.1 ps for quinone-reduced RCs from Rs. rubrum, Rb. capsulatus, Rs. centenum, and Rb. sphaeroides, respectively. The general spectral features of the initial charge separated state are essentially the same for the four species, except for differences in the wavelengths of the absorption changes due to the different donor band positions. The pH dependence of the charge recombination rates from the primary and secondary quinones differ for reaction centers from the four species indicating different interactions between the quinones and ionizable residues. A different mechanism for charge recombination from the secondary quinone, that probably is direct recombination, is proposed for RCs from Rs. centenum.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24306562     DOI: 10.1007/BF00018263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  28 in total

1.  Characterization of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata.

Authors:  P F Weaver; J D Wall; H Gest
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1975-11-07       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Biochemical characterization and electron-transfer reactions of sym1, a Rhodobacter capsulatus reaction center symmetry mutant which affects the initial electron donor.

Authors:  A K Taguchi; J W Stocker; R G Alden; T P Causgrove; J M Peloquin; S G Boxer; N W Woodbury
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-10-27       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Mechanism of the initial charge separation in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  C K Chan; T J DiMagno; L X Chen; J R Norris; G R Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Direct observation of vibrational coherence in bacterial reaction centers using femtosecond absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  M H Vos; J C Lambry; S J Robles; D C Youvan; J Breton; J L Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Growth of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata under anaerobic dark conditions with dimethyl sulfoxide.

Authors:  H C Yen; B Marrs
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.013

6.  Plasmid pU29, a vehicle for mutagenesis of the photosynthetic puf operon in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata.

Authors:  E J Bylina; S Ismail; D C Youvan
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Nucleotide and deduced polypeptide sequences of the photosynthetic reaction-center, B870 antenna, and flanking polypeptides from R. capsulata.

Authors:  D C Youvan; E J Bylina; M Alberti; H Begusch; J E Hearst
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Charge separation in a reaction center incorporating bacteriochlorophyll for photoactive bacteriopheophytin.

Authors:  C Kirmaier; D Gaul; R DeBey; D Holten; C C Schenck
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Characterisation of reaction centers and their phospholipids from Rhodospirillum rubrum.

Authors:  M Snozzi; R Bachofen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1979-05-09

10.  The structural genes coding for the L and M subunits of Rhodospirillum rubrum photoreaction center.

Authors:  G Bélanger; J Bérard; P Corriveau; G Gingras
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cofactor-specific photochemical function resolved by ultrafast spectroscopy in photosynthetic reaction center crystals.

Authors:  Libai Huang; Nina Ponomarenko; Gary P Wiederrecht; David M Tiede
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Electron transfer in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center assembled with zinc bacteriochlorophyll.

Authors:  Su Lin; Paul R Jaschke; Haiyu Wang; Mark Paddock; Aaron Tufts; James P Allen; Federico I Rosell; A Grant Mauk; Neal W Woodbury; J Thomas Beatty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energy trapping and detrapping by wild type and mutant reaction centers of purple non-sulfur bacteria.

Authors:  A Freiberg; J P Allen; J C Williams; N W Woodbury
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Characterization of mercury(II)-induced inhibition of photochemistry in the reaction center of photosynthetic bacteria.

Authors:  Gábor Sipka; Mariann Kis; Péter Maróti
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Mutation H(M202)L does not lead to the formation of a heterodimer of the primary electron donor in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides when combined with mutation I(M206)H.

Authors:  Anton M Khristin; Alexey A Zabelin; Tatiana Yu Fufina; Ravil A Khatypov; Ivan I Proskuryakov; Vladimir A Shuvalov; Anatoly Ya Shkuropatov; Lyudmila G Vasilieva
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  X-ray structure of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center with an M197 Phe→His substitution clarifies the properties of the mutant complex.

Authors:  Georgii Selikhanov; Tatiana Fufina; Sebastian Guenther; Alke Meents; Azat Gabdulkhakov; Lyudmila Vasilieva
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Glycotripod amphiphiles for solubilization and stabilization of a membrane-protein superassembly: importance of branching in the hydrophilic portion.

Authors:  Pil S Chae; Marc J Wander; Aaron P Bowling; Philip D Laible; Samuel H Gellman
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.164

8.  Weak temperature dependence of P (+) H A (-) recombination in mutant Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers.

Authors:  Krzysztof Gibasiewicz; Rafał Białek; Maria Pajzderska; Jerzy Karolczak; Gotard Burdziński; Michael R Jones; Klaus Brettel
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.