Literature DB >> 24306212

Factors affecting a dilated ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: the relevance of valve anatomy, body size and age.

Hiroyuki Nishi1, Taichi Sakaguchi, Shigeru Miyagawa, Yasushi Yoshikawa, Satsuki Fukushima, Daisuke Yoshioka, Takayoshi Ueno, Toru Kuratani, Yoshiki Sawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Information regarding the appropriate management of patients with moderately dilated ascending aortas is limited. We investigated factors affecting ascending aortic dilatation in BAV patients, such as anatomy, body size and age.
METHODS: We evaluated 130 patients with BAV (age, 59.9 ± 16.1 years; body surface area (BSA), 1.58 ± 0.20 m(2)) who underwent aortic valve surgery. The cusp configuration was determined according to the presence and location of the raphe and the cusp direction. The ascending aortic diameter index (AADI) was calculated using computed tomography and the BSA.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had A-P-type BAV, while 66 had R-L-type BAV. The mean ascending aorta diameter was 42.6 ± 6.7 mm, and the mean AADI was 27.1 ± 5.6 mm/m(2). Based on the AADI, cusp configuration (R-L-BAV: 28.3 ± 6.0 mm/m(2) vs. A-P-BAV: 25.8 ± 4.9 mm/m(2), P < 0.05), a female gender, age and the presence of aortic stenosis were found to be related to ascending aortic dilatation, while the mean ascending aortic diameter did not differ between the groups. Among the elderly patients, an AADI greater than 28 mm/m(2) was more frequently observed in the R-L-BAV group than in the A-P-BAV group. Ascending aortic replacement was required after 10 years in two patients with R-L-BAV and no patients with A-P-BAV.
CONCLUSIONS: The relative ascending aortic diameter helped to identify patients with BAV with a risk of dilatation, indicating that the use of ascending aortic replacement should be considered more frequently in patients with R-L-type BAV, while the procedure is avoidable in elderly patients with A-P-type BAV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24306212     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0798-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  17 in total

1.  The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail?

Authors:  Francis Robicsek; Mano J Thubrikar; Joseph W Cook; Brett Fowler
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Kanu Chatterjee; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce Whitney Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  The bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Alan C Braverman; Hasan Güven; Michael A Beardslee; Majesh Makan; Andrew M Kates; Marc R Moon
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.200

4.  Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Benjamin M Schaefer; Mark B Lewin; Karen K Stout; Peter H Byers; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Predictors of ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valve: a wide spectrum of disease expression.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Ciro Bancone; Cesare Quarto; Giovanni Dialetto; Franco E Covino; Michelangelo Scardone; Giuseppe Caianiello; Maurizio Cotrufo
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease?

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Mark Preston; Joan Ivanov; Paul W M Fedak; Piroze Davierwala; Susan Armstrong; Tirone E David
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size.

Authors:  Ryan R Davies; Lee J Goldstein; Michael A Coady; Shawn L Tittle; John A Rizzo; Gary S Kopf; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Vascular matrix remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve malformations: implications for aortic dilatation.

Authors:  Paul W M Fedak; Mauro P L de Sa; Subodh Verma; Nafiseh Nili; Pedram Kazemian; Jagdish Butany; Bradley H Strauss; Richard D Weisel; Tirone E David
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Aortic complications after bicuspid aortic valve replacement: long-term results.

Authors:  Claudio F Russo; Simone Mazzetti; Andrea Garatti; Elena Ribera; Angela Milazzo; Giuseppe Bruschi; Marco Lanfranconi; Tiziano Colombo; Ettore Vitali
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Bicuspid aortic valve: abnormal aortic elastic properties.

Authors:  Stefano Nistri; Maria Domenica Sorbo; Cristina Basso; Gaetano Thiene
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2002-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Long-term results after treatment of the ascending aorta for bicuspid aortic valve patients.

Authors:  Sho Matsuyama; Takahiro Nishida; Tomoki Ushijima; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.