BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of anatomical resection (AR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with that of nonanatomical resection (NAR) based on the stratification of liver function (LF). METHODS: The clinical records of 174 patients with a single HCC, 2-5 cm in diameter and without macroscopic vascular invasion, were analyzed. AR was performed in 132 patients and NAR was performed in 42 patients. The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) of the 78 patients classified as the good-LF group was 10-20 % and the ICGR15 of the 54 patients classified as the poor-LF group was 20-40 %. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates of the 174 patients were 67.6 and 33.4 %, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified ICGR15 ≥ 20 %, liver cirrhosis, α-fetoprotein ≥ 100 mg/dL, and infiltrating growth as independent prognostic factors. Liver cirrhosis was significantly less frequent in patients who underwent AR than in patients who underwent NAR (52 vs. 79 %, p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis of the good-LF group, there were no significant differences in 5-year OS after AR and NAR (73.3 vs. 65.2 %, p = 0.857). By contrast, in the subgroup analysis of the poor-LF group, the 5-year OS after AR was significantly worse than after NAR (45.3 vs. 77.4 %, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: In patients with an ICGR15 ≥ 20 %, we recommend NAR rather than AR for the treatment of a solitary 2-5-cm-diameter HCC and without macroscopic vascular invasion.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of anatomical resection (AR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with that of nonanatomical resection (NAR) based on the stratification of liver function (LF). METHODS: The clinical records of 174 patients with a single HCC, 2-5 cm in diameter and without macroscopic vascular invasion, were analyzed. AR was performed in 132 patients and NAR was performed in 42 patients. The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) of the 78 patients classified as the good-LF group was 10-20 % and the ICGR15 of the 54 patients classified as the poor-LF group was 20-40 %. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates of the 174 patients were 67.6 and 33.4 %, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified ICGR15 ≥ 20 %, liver cirrhosis, α-fetoprotein ≥ 100 mg/dL, and infiltrating growth as independent prognostic factors. Liver cirrhosis was significantly less frequent in patients who underwent AR than in patients who underwent NAR (52 vs. 79 %, p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis of the good-LF group, there were no significant differences in 5-year OS after AR and NAR (73.3 vs. 65.2 %, p = 0.857). By contrast, in the subgroup analysis of the poor-LF group, the 5-year OS after AR was significantly worse than after NAR (45.3 vs. 77.4 %, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: In patients with an ICGR15 ≥ 20 %, we recommend NAR rather than AR for the treatment of a solitary 2-5-cm-diameter HCC and without macroscopic vascular invasion.
Authors: J M Llovet; J Bustamante; A Castells; R Vilana; M del C Ayuso; M Sala; C Brú; J Rodés; J Bruix Journal: Hepatology Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: K Shirabe; M Shimada; K Kajiyama; T Gion; Y Ikeda; H Hasegawa; K Taguchi; K Takenaka; K Sugimachi Journal: Cancer Date: 1998-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J Yamamoto; T Kosuge; T Takayama; K Shimada; S Yamasaki; H Ozaki; N Yamaguchi; S Mizuno; M Makuuchi Journal: Surgery Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Marcos Vinicius Perini; Graham Starkey; Michael A Fink; Ramesh Bhandari; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; Robert Jones; Christopher Christophi Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2015-01-27
Authors: Vincent S K Yip; Ronnie T P Poon; Kenneth S H Chok; Albert C Y Chan; Wing Chiu Dai; Simon H Y Tsang; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo; Tan To Cheung Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Krithika Suresh; Dawn Owen; Latifa Bazzi; William Jackson; Randall K Ten Haken; Kyle Cuneo; Mary Feng; Theodore S Lawrence; Matthew J Schipper Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mary Feng; Krithika Suresh; Matthew J Schipper; Latifa Bazzi; Edgar Ben-Josef; Martha M Matuszak; Neehar D Parikh; Theodore H Welling; Daniel Normolle; Randall K Ten Haken; Theodore S Lawrence Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Jaidip Jagtap; Said Audi; Mir Hadi Razeghi-Kondelaji; Brian L Fish; Christopher Hansen; Jayashree Narayan; Feng Gao; Gayatri Sharma; Abdul K Parchur; Anjishnu Banerjee; Carmen Bergom; Meetha Medhora; Amit Joshi Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Diego A S Toesca; Bulat Ibragimov; Amanda J Koong; Lei Xing; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang Journal: J Radiat Res Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.724