Literature DB >> 24305671

The conflict between natural and artificial selection in finite populations.

F W Nicholas1, A Robertson.   

Abstract

A single locus model of the interaction between natural selection and artificial selection for a quantitative character in a finite population, assuming heterozygote superiority in natural fitness but additive action on the character, has been studied using transition probability matrices.If natural selection is strong enough to create a selection plateau in which genetic variance declines relatively slowly, then the total response to artificial selection prior to the plateau will be much less than that expected in the absence of natural selection, and the half-life of response will be shorter. Such a plateau is likely to have a large proportion, if not all, of the original genetic variance still present. In selection programmes using laboratory animals, it seems likely that the homozygote favoured by artificial selection must be very unfit before such a plateau will occur. A significant decrease in population fitness as a result of artificial selection does not necessarily imply that the metric character is an important adaptive character.These implications of this model of natural selection are very similar to those derived by James (1962) for the optimum model of natural selection. In fact, there seems to be no aspect of the observable response to artificial selection that would enable anyone to distinguish between these two models of natural selection.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 24305671     DOI: 10.1007/BF00264426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  10 in total

1.  Some population genetic models combining artificial and natural selection pressures: I. one-locus theory.

Authors:  D Carmelli; S Karlin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Some population genetic models combining artificial and natural selection pressures: II. two-locus theory.

Authors:  S Karlin; D Carmelli
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Selection for heterozygotes in small populations.

Authors:  A ROBERTSON
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Conflict between directional and centripetal selection.

Authors:  J W JAMES
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Attenuation of genetic progress under continued selection in poultry.

Authors:  M LERNER; E R DEMPSTER
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Analyses of some genes from abdominal bristle number selection lines inDrosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Hollingdale
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Interaction between natural selection for heterozygotes and directional selection.

Authors:  M W Verghese
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Correlated responses in reproductive fitness to selection in chickens.

Authors:  M W Verghese; A W Nordskog
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The effects of inbreeding at loci with heterozygote advantage.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. II. The genetic nature of the limits.

Authors:  R C Roberts
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Directional and stabilizing selection for developmental time and correlated response in reproductive fitness in Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  M H Soliman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Accumulation of lethals in highly selected lines of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.