Literature DB >> 24305420

Why commercialization of gene therapy stalled; examining the life cycles of gene therapy technologies.

F D Ledley1, L M McNamee2, V Uzdil2, I W Morgan3.   

Abstract

This report examines the commercialization of gene therapy in the context of innovation theories that posit a relationship between the maturation of a technology through its life cycle and prospects for successful product development. We show that the field of gene therapy has matured steadily since the 1980s, with the congruent accumulation of >35 000 papers, >16 000 US patents, >1800 clinical trials and >$4.3 billion in capital investment in gene therapy companies. Gene therapy technologies comprise a series of dissimilar approaches for gene delivery, each of which has introduced a distinct product architecture. Using bibliometric methods, we quantify the maturation of each technology through a characteristic life cycle S-curve, from a Nascent stage, through a Growing stage of exponential advance, toward an Established stage and projected limit. Capital investment in gene therapy is shown to have occurred predominantly in Nascent stage technologies and to be negatively correlated with maturity. Gene therapy technologies are now achieving the level of maturity that innovation research and biotechnology experience suggest may be requisite for efficient product development. Asynchrony between the maturation of gene therapy technologies and capital investment in development-focused business models may have stalled the commercialization of gene therapy.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24305420     DOI: 10.1038/gt.2013.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene Ther        ISSN: 0969-7128            Impact factor:   5.250


  10 in total

1.  Process improvement of adeno-associated virus (AAV) production.

Authors:  Jia-Shiung Guan; Kai Chen; Yingnan Si; Taehyun Kim; Zhuoxin Zhou; Seulhee Kim; Lufang Zhou; Xiaoguang Margaret Liu
Journal:  Front Chem Eng       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 2.  Functional polymers of gene delivery for treatment of myocardial infarct.

Authors:  Young-Wook Won; David A Bull; Sung Wan Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  A snapshot of gene therapy in Latin America.

Authors:  Rafael Linden; Ursula Matte
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 4.  Can microfluidics address biomanufacturing challenges in drug/gene/cell therapies?

Authors:  Hon Fai Chan; Siying Ma; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2016-03-08

5.  Timelines of translational science: From technology initiation to FDA approval.

Authors:  Laura M McNamee; Michael Jay Walsh; Fred D Ledley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modeling timelines for translational science in cancer; the impact of technological maturation.

Authors:  Laura M McNamee; Fred D Ledley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The life-cycles of skin replacement technologies.

Authors:  Mihail Climov; Adriana C Panayi; Gregory Borah; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Organoid Technologies for Developing Next-Generation Vision Restoration Therapies of Blindness.

Authors:  Ratnesh K Singh; Francois Binette; Magdalene Seiler; Simon M Petersen-Jones; Igor O Nasonkin
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 9.  Gene therapy for monogenic liver diseases: clinical successes, current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Julien Baruteau; Simon N Waddington; Ian E Alexander; Paul Gissen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.982

10.  As Technologies for Nucleotide Therapeutics Mature, Products Emerge.

Authors:  Jennifer M Beierlein; Laura M McNamee; Fred D Ledley
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2017-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.