| Literature DB >> 24304589 |
Chen-Mei Chen, Mei Chang Yeh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A current prevalence and relevant risk factors for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) have been reported by various ethnic groups and countries. By contrast, nationwide data for the incidence of IFG in Taiwan have not been presented in the past 15 years. The aim for this manuscript was to estimate the prevalence of IFG and associated risk factors in the population of Taiwan.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24304589 PMCID: PMC3866508 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Estimated prevalence of impaired fasting glucose in Taiwan, 2005–2008
| 1997 ADA definition as FPG 110-125 mg/dl | 18435969 | 14931484(81.0) | 1937615(10.5) | 1566870(8.5) |
| 2003 ADA definition as FPG 100-125 mg/dl | 18435969 | 10269578(55.7) | 6599521(35.8) | 1566870(8.5) |
| Sex | | | | |
| Men (n = 1285) | 9197400 | 4392250(47.8) | 3868773(42.1) | 936377(10.1) |
| Women (n = 1319) | 9238569 | 5877328(63.6) | 2730748(29.6) | 630493(6.8) |
Abbreviation: IFG impaired fasting glucose; DM diabetes; ADA American Diabetes Association; FPG fasting plasma glucose.
Weighted frequency (based on sample weights).
Figure 1Prevalence of impaired fasting glucose by sex according to age group.
Comparison of the levels of age, lipids, BP, BMI and WC between IFG and normal participants
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age | 38.7±14.4 | 48.2±15.4* |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 184.3±34.3 | 194.2±37.6* |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 98.9±61.4 | 138.7±111.0* |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 115.6±32.4 | 124.0±36.2* |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 57.2±14.6 | 51.2±13.9* |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 106.6±13.1 | 116.5±17.1* |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 66.8±10.2 | 72.5±11.3* |
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | 22.5±3.4 | 25.0±3.7* |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 76.4±9.5 | 84.3±9.9* |
| Men ≥ 90 cm | 80.1±8.9 | 86.7±9.0* |
| Women ≥ 80 cm | 73.7±8.9 | 80.9±10.2* |
| Overweight (%) | 21.4 | 31* |
| Obesity (%) | 9.1 | 27. 8* |
| Abdominal obesity (%) | 17.8 | 43.2* |
| Hypertension (%) | 7.5 | 23.7* |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 38.5 | 57.4* |
Data are means ± SD or n (%). *P < 0.01.
ORs and 95%CIs for IFG compared with normal glucose from multiple logistic regression model
| Sex | | | |
| Women | 1.00 (Reference) | | |
| Men | 1.99*(1.99-2.00) | | |
| Age | 1.03*(1.03-1.04) | 1.03*(1.03-1.03) | 1.04*(1.04-1.04) |
| BMI group | | | |
| BMI < 24 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 27 > BMI ≥ 24 (Overweight) | 1.44*(1.43-1.44) | 1.38*(1.38-1.39) | 1.69*(1.68-1.70) |
| BMI ≥ 27 (Obesity) | 2.74*(2.73-2.76) | 4.01*(3.98-4.03) | 2.16*(2.15-2.17) |
| Abdominal obesity | | | |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 1.63*(1.63-1. 64) | 1.54*(1.53-1.55) | 1.46*(1.45-1.46) |
| Hypertension | | | |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 1.42*(1.42-1.43) | 1.33*(1.32-1.33) | 1.53*(1.52-1.54) |
| Hyperlipidemia | | | |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 1.17*(1.16-1.17) | 1.06*(1.05-1.06) | 1.25*(1.25-1.26) |
*P < 0.01.
Logistic regression: associated risk factors were selected stepwise in model taking IFG as a dependent variable. Variables included in the model were: sex, age, BMI group, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.