BACKGROUND: Improving quality of care for people with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) requires performance measures reflecting the heterogeneity and scope of their care. Since most existing measures are disease specific, performance measures must be refined and new measures must be developed to address the complexity of care for those with MCCs. OBJECTIVES: To describe development of the Performance Measurement for People with Multiple Chronic Conditions (PM-MCC) conceptual model. STUDY DESIGN: Framework development and a national stakeholder panel. METHODS: We used reviews of existing conceptual frameworks of performance measurement, review of the literature on MCCs, input from experts in the multistakeholder Steering Committee, and public comment. RESULTS: The resulting model centers on the patient and family goals and preferences for care in the context of multiple care sites and providers, the type of care they are receiving, and the national priority domains for healthcare quality measurement. CONCLUSIONS: This model organizes measures into a comprehensive framework and identifies areas where measures are lacking. In this context, performance measures can be prioritized and implemented at different levels, in the context of patients' overall healthcare needs.
BACKGROUND: Improving quality of care for people with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) requires performance measures reflecting the heterogeneity and scope of their care. Since most existing measures are disease specific, performance measures must be refined and new measures must be developed to address the complexity of care for those with MCCs. OBJECTIVES: To describe development of the Performance Measurement for People with Multiple Chronic Conditions (PM-MCC) conceptual model. STUDY DESIGN: Framework development and a national stakeholder panel. METHODS: We used reviews of existing conceptual frameworks of performance measurement, review of the literature on MCCs, input from experts in the multistakeholder Steering Committee, and public comment. RESULTS: The resulting model centers on the patient and family goals and preferences for care in the context of multiple care sites and providers, the type of care they are receiving, and the national priority domains for healthcare quality measurement. CONCLUSIONS: This model organizes measures into a comprehensive framework and identifies areas where measures are lacking. In this context, performance measures can be prioritized and implemented at different levels, in the context of patients' overall healthcare needs.
Authors: Martin Fortin; Gina Bravo; Catherine Hudon; Lise Lapointe; José Almirall; Marie-France Dubois; Alain Vanasse Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-04-26
Authors: LeChauncy D Woodard; Cassie R Landrum; Tracy H Urech; Jochen Profit; Salim S Virani; Laura A Petersen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Martin Fortin; Jonathan Dionne; Geneviève Pinho; Julie Gignac; José Almirall; Lise Lapointe Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Dorothy A Brooten; Roberta L Campbell; Greg Maislin; Kathleen M McCauley; J Sanford Schwartz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Katrin Uhlig; Bruce Leff; David Kent; Sydney Dy; Klara Brunnhuber; Jako S Burgers; Sheldon Greenfield; Gordon Guyatt; Kevin High; Rosanne Leipzig; Cynthia Mulrow; Kenneth Schmader; Holger Schunemann; Louise C Walter; James Woodcock; Cynthia M Boyd Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Leah L Zullig; Heather E Whitson; Susan N Hastings; Chris Beadles; Julia Kravchenko; Igor Akushevich; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eleanor C Majellano; Vanessa L Clark; Rebecca F McLoughlin; Peter G Gibson; Vanessa M McDonald Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Caroline S Blaum; Jonathan Rosen; Aanand D Naik; Cynthia D Smith; Lilian Dindo; Lauren Vo; Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos; Jessica Esterson; Mary Geda; Rosie Ferris; Darce Costello; Denise Acampora; Thomas Meehan; Mary E Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Daniel E Forman; Mathew S Maurer; Cynthia Boyd; Ralph Brindis; Marcel E Salive; Frances McFarland Horne; Susan P Bell; Terry Fulmer; David B Reuben; Susan Zieman; Michael W Rich Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Davide L Vetrano; Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga; Alessandra Marengoni; Graziano Onder; Jürgen M Bauer; Matteo Cesari; Luigi Ferrucci; Laura Fratiglioni Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 6.053