Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), is an increasing threat to global health. Available medicines were introduced over 40 years ago, have undesirable side effects, and give equivocal results of cure in the chronic stage of the disease. We report the development of two compounds, 6 and (S)-7, with PCR-confirmed curative activity in a mouse model of established T. cruzi infection after once daily oral dosing for 20 days at 20 mg/kg 6 and 10 mg/kg (S)-7. Compounds 6 and (S)-7 have potent in vitro activity, are noncytotoxic, show no adverse effects in vivo following repeat dosing, are prepared by a short synthetic route, and have druglike properties suitable for preclinical development.
Chagas disease, caused by the n class="Disease">protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), is an increasing threat to global health. Available medicines were introduced over 40 years ago, have undesirable side effects, and give equivocal results of cure in the chronic stage of the disease. We report the development of two compounds, 6 and (S)-7, with PCR-confirmed curative activity in a mouse model of established T. cruzi infection after once daily oral dosing for 20 days at 20 mg/kg 6 and 10 mg/kg (S)-7. Compounds 6 and (S)-7 have potent in vitro activity, are noncytotoxic, show no adverse effects in vivo following repeat dosing, are prepared by a short synthetic route, and have druglike properties suitable for preclinical development.
Chagas disease is a
major human health
issue. The disease is found primarily in endemic areas of 21 Latin
American countries,[1] with Bolivia currently
experiencing the highest disease burden.[2] Population migration and travel have distributed the disease into
the United States, Europe, and Asia where it poses a growing risk
to public health.[3] Current levels of global
infection are estimated to be between 7 and 8 million people.[1]An acute illness results after initial
infection with n class="Species">T. cruzi, from which the majority
of people recover in the absence of treatment but remain infected.
The long-term prognosis of Chagas disease sufferers is complicated
by the migration of parasites from blood into tissues, causing protracted
damage to the heart, colon, and esophagus in particular, as a consequence
of lesions, inflammation, and fibrosis. The most severe cases lead
to cardiomyopathy, megacolon, and megaesophagus syndromes.[4] Exact morbidity and mortality figures vary with
disease stage and are hard to determine accurately. Recent reports
state Chagas disease to be the leading cause of death in the elderly
in Brazil[5] and a significant contributing
factor to the global burden of cardiovascular disease.[6]
Treatment options are severely limited with only
two drugs currently approved, benznidazole and n class="Chemical">nifurtimox. Both drugs
are contraindicated for pregnant women and nursing mothers, an important
limitation given that congenital transmission is a common method of
infection.[7] The adverse effects of both
drugs are well documented[8] and are exacerbated
by the requirement for long treatment times. Benznidazole is currently
the preferred choice, treating the acute stage of the infection most
successfully with cure rates of up to 60%,[9] although cessation of treatment occurs regularly with up to 30%
of adult patients experiencing serious adverse reactions.[10,11] Children below the age of 7 tolerate the drug much better than adults,[12] and a pediatric formulation is now available.
Treatment of the chronic form of the disease is controversial because
of the lack of a demonstrated cure in patients in the late stages
of the disease. Advocates supporting treatment suggest that even slowing
progression to severe forms of the disease is a beneficial outcome,
especially to untreated individuals infected during childhood.[4] The data remain controversial however,[13] and the ongoing BENEFIT clinical trial investigating
the treatment of chronic Chagas patients with cardiomyopathy is aimed
at providing further information on this issue.[14]
Innovative efforts to address drug inadequacy and
plug the treatment gap has propelled antifungal CYP51 inhibitors into
the Chagas therapeutic area, and clinical trials are in progress with
third generation azole antifungals posaconazole[15] and E1224, a prodrug of ravuconazole.[16] The attention generated through the investigation of this
drug class has initiated drug discovery efforts focused on compounds
specifically optimized against T. cruziCYP51 (TcCYP51), the homologous enzyme in the parasite.[17,18] In a breakthrough for this class of compounds, parasitological cure
of T. cruzi infectedmice with a twice daily treatment
for 30 days of TcCYP51 inhibitor VNI was recently demonstrated in
acute (compound administration 24 h postinfection) and chronic (compound
administration 90 days postinfection) immunosuppressive laboratory
models of Chagas disease.[19] VNI belongs
to the azole class of T. cruzi inhibitors, utilizing
an imidazole as the heme-binding motif. Potent inhibition of cytochrome
P450 drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4 is a limitation of this class
of compounds, an important consideration for treatment strategies
involving combination therapy to avoid drug resistance issues and
for drug–drug interactions in general.[20]We have reported our initial efforts to develop an efficacious,
low-cost, and safer alternative to benznidazole for the treatment
of n class="Disease">Chagas disease from fenarimol (1), a non-azoleCYP51
antifungal identified from a targeted screening campaign.[21] Fenarimol was optimized to give 4-(hydroxy(pyridin-3-yl)[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl)benzonitrile
(2) (Figure 1), a compound able
to reduce parasitemia to microscopically undetectable levels in a
subchronic mouse model of T. cruzi infection, following
once daily oral dosing at 20 mg/kg for 20 days. Parasites re-emerged
in blood after three cycles of immunosuppression, indicating that
the compound had not achieved a parasitological cure. While outperforming
benznidazole at this dose, 2 was not as efficacious as
posaconazole which cured ∼60% of mice when administered under
the same protocol.
Figure 1
Key scaffold hops taken during the investigation of the fenarimol
series SAR. Tc IC50 is the concentration of compound required
to cause a 50% inhibition in growth of T. cruzi (amastigote
form), and values are the mean of at least two experiments. L6 cells
(rat myoblasts from skeletal muscle) were used for assessment of cytotoxicity.
From realization that this optimized fenarimol
series was at a structure–activity dead end, a series of scaffold
hops were undertaken to open up new areas of chemical space, providing
alternative opportunities to optimize medicinal chemical parameters
and hence in vivo efficacy. Evaluation of the network of compounds
that subsequently evolved supported the development of a robust and
efficient project flow scn class="Chemical">heme and defined the target efficacy characteristics
of a potential clinical candidate based on early pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic
(PK/PD) observations. As a culmination of those efforts, we report
herein the lead optimization of two fenarimol-related scaffolds leading
to the discovery of two potent inhibitors of T. cruzi, compounds 6 and (S)-7, which have curative activity in a subchronic mouse model of T. cruzi infection. These non-azole, pyridine-containing
compounds have recently been confirmed to inhibit T. cruziCYP51.[22] They do not inhibit CYP3A4 to
any significant pharmacological extent (IC50 >10 μM),
and they have suitable druglike properties for preclinical evaluation.
Results
Compound
Design
A summary of the key scaffold hops undertaken during
the course of the SAR studies is illustn class="Species">rated in Figure 1. It was determined that the (heteroaryl)(aryl)methine moiety
was a required pharmacophore for activity against T. cruzi, with a degree of flexibility allowed in the chemical space occupied
by the third aromatic ring (Figure 1, inset).
This was demonstrated in the first instance with the evaluation of
a series of potent piperazine analogues, exemplified by 3.[23] We went on to determine that a number
of amino-substituted cyclic amines could be inserted between the central
carbon atom and the distal aromatic ring, resulting in structurally
related scaffolds as illustrated by compounds 4–7, characterized by various changes in activity and pharmacokinetic
properties.
Key scaffold hops taken during the investigation of the fenarimol
series SAR. Tc IC50 is the concentration of compound required
to cause a 50% inhibition in growth of T. cruzi (amastigote
form), and values are the mean of at least two experiments. L6 cells
(rat myoblasts from skeletal muscle) were used for assessment of cytotoxicity.
Compound Synthesis
The synthesis of 6 is very concise, using readily available
starting materials and standard synthetic transformations (Scheme 1). The order of the steps is important such that
reductive amination of n class="Chemical">3-aminopyridine with 1-tert-butoxycarboxylpiperidin-4-one to give intermediate 8 must occur before palladium-catalyzed arylation to give 9. Both palladium(II) acetate and CombiPhos-Pd6 were required
for successful transformation of 8 to 9.
Compound 6 has been synthesized on a multigram scale
using this route, with the potential for additional optimization of
reaction conditions still remaining to further improve the overall
yield. Analogues were prepared by varying the substituted aromatic
motif introduced in step 2 and the electrophilic coupling partner
in step 4.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 6 and Intermediate 10 for Analogue Preparation
Synthesis of 6 and Intermediate 10 for Analogue Preparation
Reagents and conditions: (1) NaBH(OAc)3, AcOH, DCM, reflux
(64%); (2) 4-bromotrifluoromethylphenyl, Pd(OAc)2, CombiPhos-Pd6, xantphos, NaOBu, toluene,
reflux (42%); (3) TFA–H2O–DCM (8:1:5) (quant);
(4) 2-Cl-5-CF3-pyridine, DiPEA, DMF, 95 °C (45%).The synthesis of the parent racemate of n class="Chemical">(S)-7 ((rac)-7) is also
very concise and high yielding, employing readily available starting
materials and standard synthetic transformations (Scheme 2). Simple SNAr transformation of 3-fluoropyridine
by (4-chlorophenyl)acetonitrile gave nitrile 11, which
was hydrolyzed and coupled to 1-[4-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine
(13) (prepared through palladium catalyzed amination
of 4-trifluoromethylphenyl bromide by tert-butyl
piperazine-1-carboxylate, followed by deprotection) to give the target
compound (rac)-7. Preparation of (rac)-7 has been successfully carried out on
a multigram scale with chromatographic chiral resolution performed
by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC). The absolute configuration
of the most active enantiomer was determined by X-ray diffraction
(see Supporting Information). SAR investigations
within this series were focused on derivatizing key piperazine intermediate 14 prepared as shown in Scheme 3.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of (rac)-7 and Chiral Resolution
by SFC to give (R)-7 and (S)-7
Inhibition of T. cruzi (Tulahuen strain (n class="Chemical">Tc VI)
transfected with β-galactosidase) in a whole parasite assay
(amastigote form) was used as the primary in vitro activity screen
as previously reported.[21,23] A gate of IC50 ≤ 30 nM was applied for progression into physicochemical
and in vitro ADME assays. Cytotoxicty was measured in L6 cells as
a counterscreen, but no overt cellular toxicity was observed, with
selectivity indices >1000-fold in most cases. Primary physicochemical
and ADME evaluation included estimation of log D (pH 7.4), kinetic solubility in phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), predicted
hepatic clearance and extraction ratios (EH) following incubation with human liver microsomes and inhibition
of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4.
Compound 6 SAR
The
achiral scaffold represented by compound 6 arose from
the direct replacement of the central, chiral carbon atom of the n class="Chemical">(heteroaryl)(aryl)methine
pharmacophore with the primary nitrogen atom from 4-aminopiperidine
to give an achiral (heteroaryl)(aryl)amine template. The SAR investigations
of the N-centered achiral series from which 6 was identified
were very focused, guided by SAR information obtained from the many
fernarimol-related scaffolds and subseries generated over the lifetime
of the project. On the basis of the results of our early SAR studies,[21,23] the heteroaromatic ring was fixed as 3-pyridyl for the majority
of the analogues synthesized, and a two-point SAR matrix was elaborated
with various piperidineN1 motifs (R1 SAR, Figure 2, panel A) paired with changes to substituent X1 of the N-phenyl ring (X1 SAR,
Figure 2, panel B) to optimize potency, metabolic
stability, and oral exposure. Figure 2 shows
a representative set of the compounds prepared in this SAR study.
Several compounds in this series were equipotent with posaconazole
(Tc IC50 = 0.7 nM; L6 IC50 > 100 μM),
and all compounds were more active than benznidazole (Tc IC50 = 1.5 μM; L6 IC50 > 100 μM).
Figure 2
T.
cruzi growth inhibition data for 6 and analogues:
(A) variation of the R1 substituent; (B) variation of substituents
X1 and X2 for triaryl analogues; (C) pyrimidinyl analogue
of 6. (†) Compound 16 was prepared
on an N-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(piperidin-4-yl)pyridin-3-amine
scaffold.
T.
cruzi growth inhibition data for 6 and analogues:
(A) variation of the R1 substituent; (B) variation of substituents
X1 and X2 for triaryl analogues; (C) pyrimidinyl analogue
of 6. (†) Compound 16 was prepared
on an N-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(piperidin-4-yl)pyridin-3-amine
scaffold.Lipophilicity and a degree of
space filling were required of the R1 substituent, and
simple alkyl analogues such as 15 and other hydroxylated
alkyl motifs (not shown) were unable to reach high potencies. Amides 16 and 19 achieved subnanomolar activities, exposing
what could be an additional binding pocket not accessible to any of
the 2-substituted benzyl analogues on this scaffold, e.g., 20–22, or from earlier scaffolds (Figure 1). Substituted aromatics exemplified by 23–28 were generally 2- to 3-fold less active than
the n class="Chemical">amide set, with the exception of nitrile analogues 25 and 26. R1 as either substituted 2- or 3-pyridyl
was not significantly different in activity from the phenyl analogues.
The activity of the R1 = phenyl-X set was also good following
a change of the X1 substituent to either chloro or nitrile
as shown in panel B. Additional substitution on the N1-phenyl, e.g., X2 = 2CN, 4CF3Ph (X1 = Cl), served only to increase the molecular weight with no gain
in activity or metabolic stability (data not shown). The 5-pyrimidinyl
analogue of 6 (compound 34) was surprisingly
more active than the parent compound (panel C). We have observed this
on only a few occasions throughout the expansion of the fenarimolSAR, and in general less basic heteroaromatics such as pyrimidine
and pyrazine were lower in potency, which we speculate is due to a
weaker interaction with the heme motif in the CYP51 enzyme.[22]
Microsomal stability was used to triage
the cohort of similarly active compounds, and the choice of R1 was a major influence on this parameter (Table 1). Analogues with the best balance of activity and stability
to oxidative metabolism in vitro were derived from the “substituted
aromatics” set, with the trade-off being high lipophilicity
(except 33) and low solubility at pH 6.5.
Table 1
In Vitro ADME Properties of 6 and Analogues
compd
CYP3A4 inhibitiona (μM)
pKab
glogDpH 7.4f
aqueous solubility,g pH 2/6.5 (μg/mL)
predicted human EHh
16
N/A
5.4
4.2
>100/6.3
0.91
22
18
5.1/8.7c
>5.3
>100/3.1
0.87
24
N/A
5.4/4.6c
>5.3
12.5/<1.6
0.44
25
5.2
5.4/2.2c
4.9
>100/<1.6
0.88
27
>20
5.4/4.5c
>5.3
>100/<1.6
0.65
31
>20
5.4/4.6c
4.7
25/<1.6
0.69
33
12
5.4/2.7c
3.0
25/<1.6
0.47
6
>20
5.6/5.0d
>5.3
>100/<1.6
0.68
28
16
5.4/1.9d
4.8
25/<1.6
0.74
34
6.3
5.3d/1.8e
4.9
12.5/<1.6
0.63
Human CYP3A4 inhibition (IC50) determined
in human liver microsomes using 6β-hydroxylation of testosterone
as the probe reaction pathway; N/A = not available.
pKa values
calculated using JChem for Excel; pKa refers
to 3-pyridyl nitrogen unless otherwise indicated.
pKa for piperidine
nitrogen.
pKa for 2-pyridyl nitrogen (R1).
pKa for
pyrimidinyl nitrogen.
Partition
coefficient values of the test compounds were estimated by correlation
of their chromatographic retention properties against the characteristics
of a series of standard compounds with known partition coefficient
values, at pH 7.4.
Kinetic
solubility at pH 2 and pH 6.5 determined by nephelometry.
Microsome predicted hepatic extraction
ratio (EH) determined in human liver microsomes.
HumanCYP3A4 inhibition (IC50) determined
in human liver microsomes using 6β-hydroxylation of testosterone
as the probe reaction pathway; N/A = not available.pKa values
calculated using JChem for Excel; pKa refers
to 3-pyridyl nitrogen unless otherwise indicated.pKa for piperidinenitrogen.pKa for 2-pyridyl nitrogen (R1).pKa for
pyrimidinyl nitrogen.Partition
coefficient values of the test compounds were estimated by correlation
of their chromatographic retention properties against the characteristics
of a series of standard compounds with known partition coefficient
values, at pH 7.4.Kinetic
solubility at pH 2 and pH 6.5 determined by nephelometry.Microsome predicted hepatic extractionratio (EH) determined in human liver microsomes.
Compound 7 SAR
In an attempt to enhance the stability of the important
pyridyl(n class="Chemical">phenylmethine) pharmacophore and improve in vivo efficacy,
the central methanamino motif of 5 (Figure 1) was replaced with acetamide, a structural change leading
to investigation of scaffold 14 (Scheme 3), which was readily amenable to analogue preparation. The
optimization of this new series proceeded rapidly, driven by SAR insights
gathered from earlier scaffolds.
Two small libraries of analogues
were prepared and profiled. The first library (Figure 3) covered variation of the R1 group and included
the synthesis of (rac)-7. The n class="Chemical">pyrimidine
analogue of (rac)-7 (not shown) was
prepared as part of this set but was less active (IC50 =
118 nM) than 7. The second library (Figure 4) expanded the scope of the “R1 = substituted
aromatic” set in conjunction with a change in substituent X
(X = 4-Cl and 4-CN). For compounds in this library the activity of
the most active enantiomer is shown (absolute configuration was not
determined). Compound (S)-7 and less
active enantiomer (R)-7 are included
for comparison. The potency range was similar for the equivalent SAR
study of the N1-substituted phenyl motif of compound 6 (Figure 2). The chiral resolution of analogues
of 7 was performed using SFC in a similar manner to that
for the parent compound. Table 2 shows in vitro
ADME data for these analogues.
Figure 3
T. cruzi growth inhibition
data for analogues prepared on acetamide-scaffold 14 leading
to identification of (rac)-7.
Figure 4
T. cruzi growth inhibition
data for the most active enantiomer of analogues of (S)-7. ∗∗ denotes chiral center.
Table 2
In Vitro ADME Properties
of 7 and Analogues
compd
CYP3A4 inhibitiona (μM)
pKab
glogDpH 7.4e
aqueous solubility,f pH 2/6.5 (μg/mL)
predicted human EHg
(rac)-7
16
4.8/2.9c
4.5
>100/1.6
0.50
(R)-7
17
4.8/2.9c
4.5
>100/1.6
0.61
(S)-7
15
4.8/2.9c
4.5
>100/1.6
0.53
40
>20
4.8/2.9c
3.8
>100/3.1
0.70
41
>20
4.8/1.9d
3.7
50/6.3
0.77
42
>20
4.8/1.9d
3.0
>100/25
0.56
43
7
4.7/5.4d
4.2
25/3.1
0.70
44
>20
4.7/5.4d
3.5
50/6.3
0.56
45
4
4.8/0.8c
3.0
>100/6.3
0.82
46
>20
4.8/0.8c
2.4
25/3.1
0.46
Human CYP3A4 inhibition (IC50) determined in human liver
microsomes using 6β-hydroxylation of testosterone as the probe
reaction pathway.
pKa values calculated using JChem for Excel; pKa refers to 3-pyridyl nitrogen unless otherwise
indicated.
pKa for piperazine nitrogen.
pKa for 2-pyridyl nitrogen
(R1).
Partition
coefficient values of the test compounds were estimated by correlation
of their chromatographic retention properties against the characteristics
of a series of standard compounds with known partition coefficient
values, at pH 7.4.
Kinetic
solubility at pH 2 and pH 6.5 determined by nephelometry.
Microsome predicted hepatic extraction
ratio (EH) determined in human liver microsomes.
T. cruzi growth inhibition
data for analogues prepared onacetamide-scaffold 14 leading
to identification of (rac)-7.T. cruzi growth inhibition
data for the most active enantiomer of analogues of (S)-7. ∗∗ denotes chiral center.Stability toward in vitro oxidative metabolism
by human liver microsomes ranged from low to moderate across the series
as indicated by the predicted EH values
in Table 2 (low stability, EH > 0.7; moderate stability, EH = 0.3–0.7). The nitrile analogues 40, 42, 44, 46 were more metabolically
stable (except for the (S)-7, 40 comparative pair), with modestly improved solubility (except
for the 45, 46 comparative pair), and had
lower log D values than their chloro counterparts
(S)-7, 41, 43, and 45.HumanCYP3A4 inhibition (IC50) determined in human liver
microsomes using 6β-hydroxylation of testosterone as the probe
reaction pathway.pKa values calculated using JChem for Excel; pKa refers to 3-pyridyl nitrogen unless otherwise
indicated.pKa for piperazine nitrogen.pKa for 2-pyridyl nitrogen
(R1).Partition
coefficient values of the test compounds were estimated by correlation
of their chromatographic retention properties against the characteristics
of a series of standard compounds with known partition coefficient
values, at pH 7.4.Kinetic
solubility at pH 2 and pH 6.5 determined by nephelometry.Microsome predicted hepatic extractionratio (EH) determined in human liver microsomes.
Initial PK/PD Assessment
The decision to progress compounds into in vivo efficacy and exposure
profiling was driven by the EH value with
a gate set at ≤0.7. While quite generous, this was a pragmatic
choice to provide the best chance of capturing compounds suitable
for testing in the mouse efficacy assay. Infected n class="Species">mice were treated
once daily at 20 mg/kg for up to 10 days, and parasitemia was monitored
throughout the dosing period. Single dose exposure profiles (three
time points) were assessed in a parallel group of noninfected mice
at the same dose. While not providing rigorous PK parameters, this
three-point exposure profile proved useful as an initial indication
of exposure times in relation to the in vitro IC50 while
still providing a moderate level of throughput. As shown in Figure 5, all compounds tested achieved relatively high
initial concentrations but varied in the rate of compound clearance.
All compounds that effectively reduced blood parasitemia to nondetectable
levels within the dosing period (Table 3 and
Figure 5, panel A) exhibited sustained exposure
profiles over the 24 h dosing interval, with final concentrations
significantly exceeding the in vitro IC50 range for the
compounds in this group. In contrast, the compounds that were less
effective at reducing blood parasitemia (Table 3 and Figure 5, panel B), displayed a more
rapid decrease in plasma concentrations and an overall reduced exposure
profile, with the 24 h plasma concentrations being at or well below
the IC50 range.
Figure 5
Three-point mouse exposure profiles for compounds
that effectively reduced blood parasitemia following once daily dosing
of 20 mg/kg for 10 days (A) and compounds that did not reduce parasitemia
using the same dosing protocol (B). Compounds shown in panel A are 5 (filled circle), 2 (open circle), 52 (filled triangle), 6 (open triangle), (rac)-7 (filled square), and posaconazole (open square)
and in panel B are 47 (filled circle), 48 (open circle), 49 (filled triangle), 4 (open triangle), 50 (filled square), and 51 (open square).
Table 3
Preliminary
PK/PD Assessment for Compounds Dosed Orally at 20 mg/kg for up to
10 Days to Mice Infected with T. cruzia
compd
IC50 (μM)
plasma concn, 0.5 h (μM)
plasma concn, 24 h (μM)
parasites
cleared from blood during 10-day dosing?
47
0.024
3.31
0.016
no
48
0.013
1.29
0.008
no
49
0.061
3.26
0.001
no
4
0.019
2.42
0.002
no
50
0.047
5.29
0.002
no
51
0.058
3.28
0.001
no
5
0.011
0.85
0.490
yes
2
0.012
2.49
0.030
yes
52
0.002
1.37
0.047
yes
6
0.017
5.54
0.790
yes
(rac)-7
0.007
1.55
0.370
yes
posaconazole
0.001
3.04
2.89
yes
Plasma exposure data were obtained in a parallel group of noninfected
mice following a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg.
Three-point mouse exposure profiles for compounds
that effectively reduced n class="Disease">blood parasitemia following once daily dosing
of 20 mg/kg for 10 days (A) and compounds that did not reduce parasitemia
using the same dosing protocol (B). Compounds shown in panel A are 5 (filled circle), 2 (open circle), 52 (filled triangle), 6 (open triangle), (rac)-7 (filled square), and posaconazole (open square)
and in panel B are 47 (filled circle), 48 (open circle), 49 (filled triangle), 4 (open triangle), 50 (filled square), and 51 (open square).
Plasma exposure data were obtained in a parallel group of noninfected
mice following a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg.Representative exposure profiles
of compounds from the 6 and 7 series are
shown in the Supporting Information, and
the plasma concentrations at 0.5 and 24 h following a single 20 mg/kg
oral dose to noninfected n class="Species">mice are shown in Table 4. The desired pharmacokinetic profile of high plasma levels,
extended exposure over the dosing interval, and high exposure relative
to the in vitro IC50 was achieved within both compound
sets, reflective of the highly optimized nature of the scaffolds.
While this abbreviated exposure analysis does not allow the determination
of pharmacokinetic parameters and does not take into account potential
accumulation following repeat administration, it was used as a practical
mechanism for prioritizing compounds for in vivo efficacy testing.
Of this group, the three sulfones (33, 45, and 46) exhibited the most rapid clearance and had
the lowest plasma concentrations at 24 h.
Table 4
Plasma
Concentrations in Noninfected Mice at 0.5 and 24 h after a Single
20 mg/kg Oral Dosea
compd
IC50 (μM)
plasma concn, 0.5 h (μM)
plasma concn, 24 h (μM)
6
0.017
5.54
0.79
24
0.017
8.30
0.94
31
0.003
0.51
1.11
33
0.002
3.15
0.01
34
0.005
7.77
0.69
(S)-7
0.012
4.42
0.65
40
0.012
4.74
0.51
41
0.008
6.6
0.10
43
0.012
5.4
0.20
44
0.012
11.1
0.10
45
0.002
18.8
0.01
46
0.024
15.7
0.001
posaconazole
0.001
3.83
2.89
See also graphical presentation in Supporting
Information.
See also graphical presentation in Supporting
Information.For 6 and (S)-7, a more complete
assessment of the pharmacokinetic properties in n class="Species">mice was also obtained
following intravenous and oral administration. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 6, both compounds
exhibited relatively low clearance, high volume of distribution, long
half-life, and high oral bioavailability.
Table 5
Pharmacokinetic
Parameters in Mice after Intravenous and Oral Administration of 6 and (S)-7
parameter
6
(S)-7
iv dose (mg/kg)
2
2
po dose (mg/kg)
20
20
plasma CL (mL min–1 kg–1)
8.1
7.7
plasma Vss (L/kg)
4.4
4.2
half-life, iv/po (h)
8.6/12.5
5.9/8.2
oral bioavailability (%)
95
64
Figure 6
Plasma concentration
versus time profiles following intravenous administration of 2 mg/kg
(A) or oral administration of 20 mg/kg (B) to noninfected mice. Data
represent the mean of three measurements (±SD) at each time point
for 6 (filled circles) and (S)-7 (open triangles).
Plasma concentration
versus time profiles following intravenous administration of 2 mg/kg
(A) or oral administration of 20 mg/kg (B) to noninfected mice. Data
represent the mean of three measurements (±SD) at each time point
for 6 (filled circles) and (S)-7 (open triangles).
Efficacy of Lead Compounds in Vivo
Compounds with the desired
oral exposure profile were progressed into a rigorous efficacy study
to assess curative activity in n class="Species">mice infected with T. cruzi. Swiss mice inoculated with 40 000 trypomastigotes were administered
test compounds 8 days postinfection on a once daily basis for 20 days.
If parasites were not detected in blood following this treatment duration,
cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression was commenced 10 days after
cessation of dosing and in three cycles, with each cycle comprising
4 days of treatment followed by a 3-day rest. The absence of parasites
in organs was evaluated by PCR analysis on tissue samples (spleen,
heart, skeletal muscle, and colon) and blood to determine whether
or not the mice were cured. A curative outcome reflected a negative
result for all samples. The efficacy of lead compounds 6, (rac)-7, and (S)-7 is shown in Table 6 and in Figure 7, along with posaconazole (used as a positive control)
and benznidazole.
Table 6
Survival and Cures after Once Daily
Oral Dosing for 20 Days to T. cruzi Infected Mice
mouse survival after infectiona
compd
dose (mg/kg)
day 8
day 28
day 37
day 58
–ve PCRb
cure ratec (%)
6
20
5 of 5
4 of 5
4 of 5
3 of 5
3 of 3
60
benznidazole
100
5 of 5
4 of 5
4 of 5
0 of 5
posaconazoled
20
5 of 5
4 of
5
4 of 5
1 of 5
1 of 1
20
(rac)-7
20
5
of 5
5 of 5
5 of 5
3 of
5
0 of 3
(S)-7
5
4 of 4
4 of 4
4 of 4
3 of 4
0 of 3
0
(S)-7
10
4 of 4
4 of 4
4 of 4
3 of 4
2
of 3
50
posaconazoled
20
3 of 3
3 of 3
3 of 3
2 of 3
2
of 2
66
vehiclee
5 of 5
0 of 5
Number of mice surviving out of the number of mice starting the
experiment. Mice observed to have reoccurrence of parasites in blood
were euthanized; day 8 = first compound dose; day 28 = first day of
10-day nontreatment period; day 37 = last day of nontreatment period
prior to immunosuppression; day 58 = experiment end after three cycles
of immunosuppression.
PCR
analysis of blood and tissue samples taken from spleen, heart, skeletal
muscle, and colon. Cures were defined as mice being PCR negative (−ve)
for parasite DNA in all samples.
Percentage of mice that were cured of infection.
Posaconazole was used as a positive
control. Cure rates for this compound vary approximately 20–60%
in this assay.
Vehicle-treated
mice were euthanized by day 13–14.
Figure 7
Efficacy data
in T. cruzi infected mice following once daily oral
treatment for 20 days beginning on day 8 postinfection. The three
panels represent separate experiments, and data points are the mean
± SEM. Symbols represent the following: filled circle (vehicle
control, n = 5 in panel A, n = 3
in panels B and C); open square (100 mg/kg benznidazole, n = 5); filled diamond (20 mg/kg posaconazole, n =
5 in panel A, n = 3 in panels B and C); open triangle
(20 mg/kg 6, n = 5); open diamond (20
mg/kg (rac)-7, n =
5); filled triangle (5 mg/kg (S)-7, n = 4); open circle (10 mg/kg (S)-7, n = 4). Crosses represent animal deaths
(panel A, day 12 (posaconazole), day 16 (compound 6)),
and the treatment phase is shown as the gray shaded area. The limit
of detection (LOD) of the microscopic method is 20 000 parasites/mL.
Number of mice surviving out of the number of mice starting the
experiment. Mice observed to have reoccurrence of parasites in blood
were euthanized; day 8 = first compound dose; day 28 = first day of
10-day nontreatment period; day 37 = last day of nontreatment period
prior to immunosuppression; day 58 = experiment end after three cycles
of immunosuppression.PCR
analysis of blood and tissue samples taken from spleen, heart, skeletal
muscle, and colon. Cures were defined as n class="Species">mice being PCR negative (−ve)
for parasite DNA in all samples.
Percentage of mice that were cured of infection.Posaconazole was used as a positive
control. Cure rates for this compound vary approximately 20–60%
in this assay.Vehicle-treated
mice were euthanized by day 13–14.Compound 6 dosed at 20 mg/kg significantly
improved mouse survival compared to vehicle-treated n class="Species">mice, and 4 out
of 5 mice were parasite free at the end of dosing. Following three
cycles of immunosuppression, 3 out of 4 mice remained microscopically
parasite free. PCR analyses of organs and blood from these mice were
negative for parasite DNA, indicating an overall cure rate of 60%.
Posaconazole, as the positive control, achieved a cure rate of 20%
at the same dose level in this experiment. Mice dosed orally with
benznidazole at 100 mg/kg experienced a re-emergence of parasites
in blood during the immunosuppression phase of the experiment. All
of the vehicle-treated mice exhibited increasing parasitemia and were
euthanized by day 14. Administration of lower doses of 6 (5 and 10 mg/kg) improved mouse survival relative to vehicle-treated
mice, but parasitological cure was not observed (data not shown).
No other analogues in this series were as efficacious as compound 6.
The efficacy and cure rate of (n class="Gene">rac)-7 was assessed following daily oral dosing at 20 mg/kg.
Mouse survival relative to vehicle-treated mice was significantly
improved with 5 out of 5 (100%) surviving and being microscopically
parasite free in blood until day 37 (the end of the rest period).
At the end of the experiment following three rounds of immunosuppression,
3 out of 5 mice (60%) did not show signs of parasite rebound, but
PCR analyses of organs and blood from these mice were positive for
parasite DNA, indicating no cures were obtained.
Further investigations
were conducted with active enantiomer (S)-7 dosed at 5 and 10 mg/kg. n class="Species">Mouse survival and general health were
significantly improved at the 5 mg/kg dose relative to vehicle-treated
mice, with 3 out of 4 mice (75%) surviving until the end of the experiment.
Results from PCR analyses of organs and blood from these mice were
positive for parasite DNA in colon and skeletal muscle in all three
mice, indicating cure had not been achieved. Compound (S)-7 dosed at 10 mg/kg attained the same level of mouse
survival as the 5 mg/kg dose and in addition, achieved a parasitological
cure in 2 out of the 3 mice remaining at the end of the experiment
as determined by PCR analyses of organs and blood, representative
of a 50% cure rate for (S)-7 in this
experiment. The mouse in which cure was not obtained was only positive
for parasite DNA in spleen and negative in all other samples.
Efficacy data
in T. cruzi infectedn class="Species">mice following once daily oral
treatment for 20 days beginning on day 8 postinfection. The three
panels represent separate experiments, and data points are the mean
± SEM. Symbols represent the following: filled circle (vehicle
control, n = 5 in panel A, n = 3
in panels B and C); open square (100 mg/kg benznidazole, n = 5); filled diamond (20 mg/kg posaconazole, n =
5 in panel A, n = 3 in panels B and C); open triangle
(20 mg/kg 6, n = 5); open diamond (20
mg/kg (rac)-7, n =
5); filled triangle (5 mg/kg (S)-7, n = 4); open circle (10 mg/kg (S)-7, n = 4). Crosses represent animal deaths
(panel A, day 12 (posaconazole), day 16 (compound 6)),
and the treatment phase is shown as the gray shaded area. The limit
of detection (LOD) of the microscopic method is 20 000 parasites/mL.
Discussion
The
CYP51 enzyme is of critical importance to organisms requiring n class="Chemical">sterol
biosynthesis for membrane function.[17] Inhibition
of T. cruziCYP51 affects sterol composition, damages
parasite ultrastructure, and leads to parasite kill.[17] A growing number of T. cruziCYP51 inhibitors
have been reported in the literature encompassing early hits,[23−27] thoroughly investigated leads,[28,29] and potential
clinical candidates.[19,30] The widely different experimental
protocols used to evaluate these inhibitors (and other T.
cruzi inhibitor compounds) make a comparison of compound
effectiveness challenging,[31] particularly
in in vivo efficacy experiments. Important variables include the type
of parasite strain used (or discrete typing unit (DTU)[32]), use of inbred vs wild type mice (influencing
assay variability), dosage and frequency (e.g., once or twice daily),
treatment duration, time of compound administration after infection,
use of immunosuppression to “flush out” parasites from
tissues, and the number of tissues sampled by PCR to evaluate cure.
The existence of acute and chronic disease states in the human condition
adds further complexity to the area, and feedback from ongoing clinical
trials will help define the relationship of laboratory T.
cruzi mouse infection models to the human disease.
During the course of our discovery efforts, we developed an efficient
testing flow scheme to evaluate n class="Species">T. cruzi CYP51 inhibitors
based on the non-azole antifungal compound fenarimol. Extensive in
vivo evaluation of a broad range of molecular scaffolds prepared during
lead optimization facilitated the development of a PK/PD hypothesis
to aide compound triage into an in vivo mouse model of subchronic T. cruzi infection in wild type mice. The ability of compounds
to clear parasites from the blood of mice with an established infection
following once daily oral dosing for a 10-day period provided an initial
and relatively rapid readout of compound efficacy. By relating the
outcome of these studies to compound exposure in a parallel group
of noninfected mice following oral dosing at the same dose level,
it became evident that efficacy was associated with high plasma concentrations
relative to the in vitro IC50 and an extended exposure
profile over the full dosing interval (24 h). This profile became
a point of differentiation for late stage compounds and selected for
inhibitors with the highest probability of reducing parasite burden
and improving mouse survival into the late-stage immunosuppressive
phase of the in vivo efficacy model.
On the basis of the iv
pharmacokinetic data generated for 6 and n class="Chemical">(S)-7, these extended profiles were also associated with
high volumes of distribution, a feature previously suggested to be
necessary for efficacy of other CYP51 inhibitors.[13,33] Further definition of PK/PD relationships for T. cruzi is ongoing.
In summary, two highly optimized T. cruzin class="Gene">CYP51 inhibitors, 6 and (S)-7 developed following a series of scaffold hops from screen
hit fenarimol, show curative effects in an immunosuppressive model
of subchronic T. cruzi infection in mice as determined
by PCR analyses of tissues and blood. Cure was obtained following
once daily oral dosing of 20 mg/kg 6 and 10 mg/kg (S)-7 for 20 days. The efficacy of 6 and (S)-7 was comparable to the clinical
candidate posaconazole (20 mg/kg) and better than benznidazole (100
mg/kg), the current standard of care, when evaluated in the same model.
Both compounds are potent inhibitors of T. cruzi in
vitro (Tulahuen TcVI), are noncytotoxic, and did not cause any adverse
events on extended dosing in vivo in the mouse model. These non-azole,
pyridine-based compounds do not inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 in microsomes,
a general liability of the azole class of CYP51 inhibitors and an
important contributing factor to adverse drug–drug interactions
and drug resistance. Compounds 6 and (S)-7 are prepared by short and efficient synthetic procedures
suggestive of a low cost of goods. The extremely promising efficacy
and druglike characteristics of both compounds have initiated further
profiling with regard to their potential development as new treatments
for Chagas disease.
Experimental Section
Posaconazole was purchased as an oral suspension (n class="Chemical">Noxafil Schering
Corporation, 40 mg/mL). For in vivo efficacy and pharmacokinetic studies
the oral suspension was diluted to the appropriate concentration with
water. For in vitro studies, posaconazole was first isolated from
the suspension by dilution with water and centrifugation, followed
by extraction and recrystallization from hot isopropanol. Benznidazole
was synthesized by Epichem Pty Ltd.
In Vitro Activity and ADME
Properties
Inhibition of T. cruzi (Tulahuen
strain n class="Chemical">TcVI transfected with β-galactosidase) was assessed using
a whole parasite assay (amastigote form) in accordance with the procedure
described by Buckner et al.[34] and as previously
described.[21] Compounds were added to infected
cells in seven-point serial dilutions performed in triplicate and
incubated for 96 h. A gate of IC50 ≤ 30 nM was applied
for progression into physicochemical and in vitro ADME assays. Cytotoxicity
was assessed in L6 cells as previously described.[21]
In silico physicochemical parameters were calculated
using JChem for Excel, version 5.1 (ChemAxon, Budapest). The log D (pH 7.4) was determined using a chromatographic method.
Data were collected using a Waters 2795 HPLC instrument with a Waters
2487 dual channel UV detector (operated at 220 and 254 nm) with a
Phenomenex Synergi Hydro-RP 4 μm (30 mm × 2 mm) column.
The mobile phase comprised n class="Chemical">aqueous buffer (50 mM ammonium acetate,
pH 7.4) and acetonitrile with an acetonitrile gradient of 0% to 100%
over 10 min. Compound retention properties were compared to a set
of nine standard compounds with known partition coefficients determined
using shake flask methods.
Kinetic solubility in phosphate buffer
(pH 6.5) was determined by serial dilution of a concentn class="Species">rated stock
solution prepared in DMSO. The solubility range was determined by
nephelometry, and reported values represent the minimum of this range.
Hepatic clearance and extraction ratio (EH) values were determined by incubating compounds with human
liver microsomes (BD Gentest, Discovery Labware Inc., Woburn, MA)
suspended in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C with a
final protein concentration of 0.4 mg/mL and compound concentration
of 1 μM. An NADPH-regenerating system (1 mg/mL NADP, 1 mg/mL
glucose 6-phosphate, 1 U/mL glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase) and
MgCl2 (0.67 mg/mL) were added to initiate the metabolic
reactions, which were subsequently quenched with ice-cold acetonitrile
at time points ranging from 0 to 60 min. Control samples were incubated
in the absence of NADPH to monitor for non-cytochrome P450-mediated
metabolism. Following quenching, samples were centrifuged and the
concentration of parent compound remaining in the supernatant was
determined by LCMS. The first-order rate constant for substrate depletion
was determined by fitting the data to an exponential decay function,
and these values were used to calculate the in vitro intrinsic clearance
which was scaled to predict the in vivo intrinsic clearance as described
previously.[35] The blood clearance and the
predicted hepatic extraction ratio (EH) were calculated using the well-stirred model of hepatic clearance.
Scaling factors and hepatic blood flow were taken from Ring et al.[36]
In Vivo Mouse Exposure and Pharmacokinetic
Studies
All animal studies were conducted using established
procedures in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for
the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, and the study
protocols were reviewed and approved by the Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical
Sciences Animal Ethics Committee. The systemic exposure of lead compounds
was assessed in nonfasted, noninfected male Swiss Outbred n class="Species">mice following
administration of compounds by oral gavage. Compounds were formulated
in either PEG400 (51, 47, 49, 4, 50) or as suspensions in an aqueous
vehicle containing 0.5% (w/v) hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (Methocel
E4M premium grade, Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI), 0.4% (v/v) Tween
80 (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO), 0.5% (v/v) benzyl alcohol,
and 5% v/v DMSO (all remaining compounds) and administered at a dose
of 20 mg/kg. Blood samples were taken at 0.5, 7.5, and 24 h after
dosing and plasma concentrations determined by LCMS following comparison
to calibration standards prepared in blank mouse plasma. No adverse
reactions or compound-related side effects were observed after administration
of any of the test compounds at a dose of 20 mg/kg.
The in vivo
mouse pharmacokinetic properties of 6 and n class="Chemical">(S)-7 were assessed following iv and oral administration
at doses of 2 and 20 mg/kg, respectively. The iv formulations were
prepared as aqueous solutions containing 40% (v/v) propylene glycol,
10% (v/v) ethanol, and 50% 0.01 M HCl (6 iv formulation
also contained 0.4% v/v Tween 80), and the oral formulation was an
aqueous suspension containing 0.5% (w/v) hydroxypropylmethylcellulose,
0.4% (v/v) Tween 80, and 0.5% (v/v) benzyl alcohol (6 oral formulation also contained 5% v/v DMSO). The iv dosing (50
μL) was conducted via the tail vein, and oral dosing (0.2 mL)
was via gavage. A maximum of two blood samples were obtained from
each mouse, via either submandibular bleed (approximately 120 μL,
conscious sampling) or terminal cardiac puncture (0.6 mL, under isofluorane
anesthesia), and transferred to a tube containing heparin and a stabilization
cocktail (cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), potassium
fluoride, and EDTA) to minimize the potential for ex vivo degradation.
Samples were centrifuged, and plasma was separated and stored at −20
°C prior to analysis.
Plasma samples were assayed by LCMS
using a Waters Micromass Xevo TQ triple quadrupole instrument coupled
to a n class="Chemical">Waters Acquity UPLC. The column was a Supelco Ascentis Express
RP Amide column (2.7 μm particle size, 50 mm × 2.1 mm i.d.)
equipped with a Phenomenex Security Guard column with Synergy Polar
packing material, and both columns were maintained at 40 °C.
The mobile phase consisted of methanol and water, both containing
0.05% formic acid, and was delivered using a linear gradient over
3.3 min followed by re-equilibration to the starting conditions. The
flow rate was 0.4 mL/min, and the injection volume was 5 μL.
LCMS analysis was conducted in positive mode electrospray ionization
and elution of the analytes monitored in MRM mode. Quantitation was
accomplished by comparing the sample response (peak area) to a calibration
curve prepared in blank mouse plasma and processed in the same way
as the samples. The assays were validated for linearity over the sample
concentration range, accuracy, and precision.
Pharmacokinetic
parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods using WinNonlin
(version 5.2, Pharsight, Mountain View, CA). Oral bioavailability
was estimated by comparing the dose normalized area under the curve
following oral administn class="Species">ration to that following iv dosing.
In Vivo
Efficacy
Outbred female Swiss mice approximately 8 weeks
old were obtained from the Animal Resources Centre (Perth, Western
Australia). All animal experimentation was carried out with approval
of the Animal Ethics Committee of Murdoch University. n class="Species">T. cruzi parasites (Tulahuen TcVI) were passaged through adult female Swiss
mice to maintain virility. Trypomastigote-infected blood was collected
and frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent infections in mice with
an inoculum of 50 000 parasites.
Formulation of Test Compounds
Compounds 6 and (rac)-7 were made up to a concentration of 3 mg/mL in HPMC-SV (0.5% w/v
hydroxypropylmethylcellulose + 0.4% v/v Tween 80 + 0.5% v/v
benzyl alcohol in deionized H20 with 5% v/v DMSO), and
(S)-7 was made up to concentrations
of 0.75 and 1.5 mg/mL in HPMC-SV (0.5% w/v hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
+ 0.4% v/v Tween 80 + 0.5% v/v benzyl alcohol in deionized H20 with 5% v/v DMSO). Benznidazole was weighed into a clean glass
vial and made up to 15 mg/mL in PBS containing 0.4% v/v Tween 80 and
10% v/v PEG400, shaking with glass beads to achieve an even suspension.
Posaconazole (Noxafil, 40 mg/mL) was diluted with WFI for a final
concentration of 3 mg/mL. All compounds were evenly suspended and
made up fresh every 4–5 days.
In Vivo Acute Toxicity
Testing
Compounds 6, (rac)-7, and (S)-7 were tested for
acute in vivo toxicity through stepwise cumulative dosing using two
mice per compound. Mice were given 25 and/or 50 mg/kg oral doses twice
a day for a total of 2.5 days, eventually reaching cumulative doses
of 100 and 200 mg/kg. Mice were observed for 1 week following the
last dose, and no adverse effects or weight loss was noted for any
of the compounds tested in this experiment.
In Vivo Efficacy Studies
Compounds were administered once daily at a maximum dose of 20
mg/kg (test compounds and n class="Chemical">posaconazole) or 100 mg/kg benznidazole
commencing on day 8 postinfection (pi). For the initial PK/PD assessment,
compounds were administered for 10 days and parasitemia was monitored
throughout the dosing period by microscopy. More promising compounds
and the positive controls posaconazole and benznidazole were progressed
to a more rigorous efficacy study with dosing once daily for 20 days,
with the last dose being administered on day 27 pi. Blood parasitemia
was monitored over the course of the 20-day treatment. If parasites
were not detected in blood following this treatment duration, cyclophosphamide-induced
immunosuppression was commenced 10 days after cessation of dosing.
Cyclophosphamide (50 mg kg–1 day–1) was administered ip in three cycles, with each cycle comprising
4 days of treatment followed by 3 days of rest. The absence of parasites
from organs following this treatment was confirmed by PCR analysis
targeting the nuclear satellite DNA of T. cruzi on
tissue samples (spleen, heart, skeletal muscle, and colon) and blood.[37,38] Euthanasia was carried out if parasitemia exceeded 9 × 106 parasites/mL, parasites rebounded in blood after dosing was
completed, there were three minor abnormal clinical observations or
one major clinical observation, or more than 20% weight loss occurred.
Chemistry
Reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers
and used without further purification. Commercially available anhydrous
solvents were used and stored under nitrogen unless indicated otherwise.
Reactions involving moisture sensitive reagents were conducted under
an atmosphere of dry n class="Chemical">nitrogen in glassware dried with a heat gun.
Thin layer chromatography (TLC) using silica gel Merck 60 F254 plates
and detection with UV light was used to monitor reactions. 1H and 13CNMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solutions on a Varian 200,
Bruker 300, or Varian 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts are
reported in parts per million (δ) downfield of tetramethylsilane
(TMS). GCMS data were acquired on an Agilent 5973 network instrument.
LCMS data were acquired on an Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex API-2000
system. Flash chromatography was carried out with silica gel (0.04–0.06
μm, 230–400 mesh), with reverse phase silica gel (C18
35–70 μm), or on a Flashmaster II system using cartridges
prepared in-house. All compounds tested in the in vitro and in vivo
biological screens were purified to >95%. Purity was determined
by HPLC analysis on an Agilent 1100 series instrument, fitted with
a C8 reverse phase Agilent zorbax eclipse DB-LB 4.6 mm × 150
mm, 5 μm column (flow rate of 1.2 mL/min), 1HNMR
spectra (accounting for noncompound peaks and residual solvent), and
LCMS. Microwave reactions were carried out using a Biotage Initiator
EXP machine.
Preparation of N-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-N-(1-[5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]piperidin-4-yl)pyridin-3-amine
(6)
tert-Butyl 4-(Pyridin-3-ylamino)piperidine-1-carboxylate
( n class="Chemical">Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (63.82 g,
301.2 mmol) was added to a mixture of 1-tert-butoxycarboxylpiperidin-4-one
(40.0 g, 200.8 mmol), 3-aminopyridine (20.78 g, 220.8 mmol), acetic
acid (13.26 g, 220.8 mmol), and dichloromethane (60 mL). The mixture
was heated under reflux overnight (20 h). After cooling to room temperature,
the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (120 mL), washed
with 2 M sodium hydroxide (6 × 70 mL) so that the pH was >7,
washed with brine (2 × 70 mL), dried (magnesium sulfate), and
concentrated to afford a light orange solid. The solid was washed
with diethyl ether (100 mL), then filtered under vacuum to afford 8 (35.5 g, 64%) as a white solid. 1HNMR (CDCl3) 8.00–8.06 (m, 1H), 7.91–7.99 (m, 1H), 7.04–7.13
(m, 1H), 6.83–7.92 (m, 1H), 3.98–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.62
(br s, 1H), 3.38–3.50 (m, 1H), 2.82–3.00 (m, 2H), 1.96–2.12
(m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.22–1.42 (m, 2H).
tert-Butyl
4-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl](pyridin-3-yl)aminopiperidine-1-carboxylate
( Sodium tert-butoxide (40.2
g, 418 mmol) was added slowly, portionwise to a mixture of 8 (29.0 g, 104.6 mmol), n class="Chemical">CombiPhos-Pd6 (1.57 g, 3.14 mmol), palladium(II)
acetate (704 mg, 3.14 mmol), xantphos (2.42 g, 4.18 mmol), and 4-bromobenzotrifluoride
(23.5 g, 104.6 mmol) in toluene (200 mL) under (and flushed with)
an atmosphere of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was heated at 110
°C for 6 h under nitrogen. Upon cooling to room temperature,
the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (150 mL) and filtered
through a short plug of Celite. The resulting filtrate was washed
with water (3 × 100 mL), washed with brine (100 mL), dried (magnesium
sulfate), filtered, and concentrated to give crude 9 (30
g) as a dark orange oil. This material was dissolved in ethyl acetate
(150 mL) and adsorbed onto silica gel (approximately 30 g). Purification
by column chromatography (eluent 100% dichloromethane increasing to
20% ethyl acetate in dichloromethane) afforded 9 (18.40
g, 42%) as a light, pale brown solid. 1HNMR (CDCl3) 8.55 (t, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 8.29–8.39
(m, 1H), 7.40–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.40 (m, 2H), 6.65
(d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 4.10–4.38 (m, 2H), 3.98–4.10
(m, 1H), 2.72–2.93 (m, 2H), 1.91–2.03 (m, 2H), 1.42
(s, 9H), 1.22–1.38 (m, 2H).
N-(Piperidin-4-yl)-N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]pyridin-3-amine
( Compound 9 (18.32 g, 43.5
mmol) was dissolved in n class="Chemical">dichloromethane (50 mL) and water (10 mL).
The resulting mixture was cooled in an ice bath and trifluoroacetic
acid (80 mL) added slowly with stirring. The mixture was allowed to
warm to room temperature and stirred overnight (16 h). TLC analysis
(miniworkup) showed only baseline material (all starting material
consumed). The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness, dissolved
in ethyl acetate (150 mL), and washed with 2 M sodium hydroxide until
the pH of the aqueous layer was 10. The organic layer was separated,
dried (magnesium sulfate), filtered, and concentrated to afford 10 (13.90 g, quantitative yield) as a sticky, dark orange
resin. 1HNMR (CDCl3) 8.50–8.55 (m, 1H),
8.32–8.38 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.45 (m, 4H), 6.65 (d, J = 0.8 Hz, 2H), 3.96–4.09 (m, 1H), 3.07–3.25
(m, 2H), 2.69–2.85 (m, 2H), 1.91–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.29–1.45
(m, 2H).
N-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-N-(1-[5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]piperidin-4-yl)pyridin-3-amine
(. n class="Chemical">N,N-Diisopropylethylamine
(62.74g, 485 mmol) was added to a mixture of 10 (39.0
g, 121 mmol) and 2-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (33.05 g, 182
mmol) in dimethylformamide (120 mL). The resulting mixture was heated
at 100 °C overnight (18 h) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. Upon
cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with
ethyl acetate (200 mL) and filtered through a plug of Celite. The
resultant solution was washed with water (3 × 100 mL), washed
with brine (200 mL), dried (magnesium sulfate), absorbed onto silica
gel (approximately 70 g), and purified by column chromatography (eluent
5% acetone in hexanes increasing to 33% acetone) to afford crude 6 (40.6 g) as a dark orange gel. This material was dissolved
in ethyl acetate (250 mL), adsorbed onto silica gel (approximately
50 g), and repurified by column chromatography (eluent hexanes, then
dichloromethane in hexanes increasing to 100% dichloromethane) to
afford 39.3 g of semicrude material which was dissolved in the minimum
volume of boiling hexanes (1250 mL). Upon seeding with a spatula tip
of purified 6 (from a previous experiment) and standing
overnight at room temperature, a solid formed. The solid material
was filtered on a sinter funnel under vacuum to afford 6 (25.5 g, 45%) as a light, pale yellow solid. 1HNMR (CDCl3) 8.53 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.31–8.39
(m, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 2.8 Hz 1H), 7.41–7.49
(m, 2H), 6.65–6.73 (m, 2H), 6.68 (d, J = 8.4
Hz 2H), 6.61 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 4.48–4.63
(m, 2H), 4.15–4.28 (m, 1H), 2.93–3.12 (m, 2H), 2.00–2.16
(m, 2H), 1.32–1.50 (m, 2H); 13CNMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 159.7, 150.5, 150.0, 147.5, 145.7, 139.1, 136.6, 134.6,
126.7, 125.0, 125.0, 124.4, 120.8, 115.7, 115.0, 105.5, 55.7, 44.4,
30.5; LCMS [M + H]+ = 467.5; mp 95–97 °C. Anal.
Calcd for C23H20F6N4:
C, 59.23; H, 4.32; N, 12.01. Found: C, 59.49; H, 4.44; N, 12.06.
The mother liquor was concentrated to give a further 12.5 g of material
as a dark orange gel, which was subjected to cycles of the solidification
process with boiling n class="Chemical">hexanes to afford a further 7.3 g, 1.3 g, and
400 mg of 6. These batches were combined, dissolved in
diethyl ether (50 mL), and washed with 4 M hydrochloric acid (180
mL). The aqueous layer was then extracted with more diethyl ether
(50 mL). The aqueous layer was then basified (to pH 13) using 2 M
sodium hydroxide (approximately 350 mL). The resulting cloudy white
aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 100 mL) and
the organic layer separated. Activated carbon was added to the ethyl
acetate layer and the resulting suspension heated to 70 °C for
2 h. Magnesium sulfate was added and the suspension filtered. The
solution was then concentrated to afford 6 (8.0 g) as
a light, pale yellow resin. Upon standing in the fridge for 12 days,
the resin had formed a white solid. This was further dried to give 6 (7.93g) as a white solid.
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-{4-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazin-1-yl}-2-(pyridin-3-yl)ethanone
(7) and (R)- and (S)-7
(4-Chlorophenyl)(pyridin-3-yl)acetonitrile
( n class="Chemical">4-Chlorophenylacetonitrile (27.6 g, 182
mmol) and 3-fluoropyridine (9.00 g, 91.8 mmol) were dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (80 mL), and the solution was to
0 °C (ice/water bath). Potassium tert-butoxide
(28.0 g, 250 mmol) was added in portions (the mixture became red/purple/orange
in color), and then the reaction vessel was placed in an oil bath
and heated to 85 °C and stirred overnight. The flask was removed
from the heat and cooled to 0 °C, quenched with 1 M HCl (aq)
to approximately pH 6–7, and diluted with ethyl acetate. A
white solid material was present and removed by filtration through
a sinter funnel, and the phases were separated. The organic layer
was washed again with water (×2), dried (MgSO4), filtered,
and concentrated under vacuum and the oily residue was purified by
column chromatography (10% ethyl acetate in hexanes increasing to
30% ethyl acetate in hexanes) to obtain the desired product still
contaminated with unreacted 4-chlorophenylacetonitrile and an unknown
impurity. This material was partitioned into 2 M HCl (aq) and diethyl
ether, and the phases were separated. The aqueous layer was washed
again with diethyl ether and then treated with 2 M NaOH (aq) to pH
∼8 and extracted with ethyl acetate (×2). The ethyl acetate
extracts were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), filtered,
and concentrated under vacuum and the residue was repurified by column
chromatography (10% ethyl acetate in hexanes increasing to 30% ethyl
acetate in hexanes) to provide intermediate nitrile 11 as an amber oil (15.4 g, 73%). 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.60–8.62 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.69 (m, 1H), 7.37–7.41
(m, 2H), 7.32–7.36 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.31 (m, 2H), 5.16
(s, 1H).)
(4-Chlorophenyl)(pyridin-3-yl)acetic Acid
( n class="Chemical">Nitrile 11 (7.5 g, 32.3 mmol)
was suspended in 2 M NaOH (aq) (75 mL) and the suspension degassed
with nitrogen for approximately 5 min. The flask was fitted with a
balloon containing nitrogen and the mixture heated to 110 °C
and stirred overnight. The mixture was cooled to room temperature
and then washed with diethyl ether. The aqueous phase was separated
and treated with 4 M HCl (aq) to pH ∼5 (precipitation observed)
and extracted with ethyl acetate (×2). The combined organic washings
were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under vacuum
to afford acid 12 as a pale yellow solid (4.4 g, 55%). 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 13.04
(br s, 1H), 8.54 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 7.68–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.30–7.48
(m, 5H), 5.21 (s, 1H).
[NB: In other repeat preparations it
has been observed that significant precipitation of some product can
occur during the acidification process and will not dissolve in the
ethyl acetate washings. This material can be isolated by filtration
and is of comparable purity or higher purity than that isolated from
the organic washings.]2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-{4-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazin-1-yl}-2-(pyridin-3-yl)ethanone
( n class="Chemical">Acid 12 (3.0 g, 12.1 mmol),
HATU (4.60 g, 12.1 mmol), and 1-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine
(13) (2.78 g, 12.1 mmol) were dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (30 mL) and treated with diisopropylethylamine
(3.18 mL, 18.2 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 3 h and then partitioned between ethyl acetate and water. The
organic layer was washed with water (×3) and then brine, dried
(MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under vacuum, and the
crude residue was purified by column chromatography (Flashmaster II
ethyl acetate/hexane/methanol gradient) to give 7 as
an off-white foam (4.2 g, 75%). 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.52 (dd, J = 1.2, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 8.48 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56–7.65 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.53
(m, 2H), 7.30–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.24
(m, 2H), 6.83–6.92 (m, 2H), 5.21 (s, 1H), 3.88–3.98
(m, 1H), 3.75–3.85 (m, 1H), 3.57–3.71 (m, 2H), 3.19–3.37
(m, 2H), 3.08–3.18 (m, 1H), 2.93–3.04 (m, 1H); 13CNMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 169.0, 152.6, 149.8, 148.8,
136.8, 136.6, 134.8, 133.7, 129.9, 129.3, 126.5, 124.7, 123.5, 121.3,
115.0, 51.6, 48.1, 47.9, 45.6, 41.9; LCMS [M + H] = 460.3; HPLC (water/ACN
+ 0.1% TFA gradient) 99.5% at 254 nm. Anal. d for C24H21F3N3O: C, 62.68; H, 4.60; N, 9.14.
Found: C, 62.70; H, 4.71; N, 9.13.
Chiral Resolution
of 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-{4-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazin-1-yl}-2-(pyridin-3-yl)ethanone
( Compound 7 was resolved by preparative chiral
HPLC using the following conditions. First eluted enantiomer = (R)-7 (98.6% ee), second eluted enantiomer =
(S)-7 (98.0% ee). Instrument: Thar 350
preparative SFC. Column: ChiralCel OJ, 10 μm, 300 mm ×
50 mm i.d. Mobile phase: A, CO2; B, methanol. Gradient:
B, 45%. Flow rate: 240 mL/min. Back pressure: 100 bar. Column temperature:
38 °C. Wavelength: 220 nm. Cycle time: 6 min. The NMR spectral
data for the separated enantiomers were identical with the data for
the racemate.
Preparation of 1-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine
(13)
To a stirred, degassed (with N2) solution of 1-(tert-butoxyn class="Chemical">carbonyl)piperazine
(15 g, 80 mmol), 4-bromobenzotrifluoride (19 g, 84 mmol), palladium
acetate (1.1 g, 2 mol %), and BINAP (2.5 g, 5 mol %) in a 1:1 mixture
of ethyl acetate (80 mL) and 1,4-dioxane (80 mL) was added cesium
carbonate (52 g, 160 mmol), and the mixture was heated to reflux under
an N2 atmosphere. After 1 h, precipitation of palladium
black had occurred and TLC analysis indicated consumption of the piperazine
starting material. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and
quenched with 10% NH4Cl (aq) (5 mL) and passed through
a small plug of silica gel, which was washed with dichloromethane.
The collected filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and the residue
purified by column chromatography (eluent dichloromethane) to afford
intermediate tert-butyl 4-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine-1-carboxylate
as an off-white solid (24.7 g, 93%). 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 7.45–7.53 (m, 2H), 6.89–6.96 (m, 2H), 3.54–3.64
(m, 4H), 3.19–3.29 (m, 4H), 1.49 (s, 9H).
tert-Butyl 4-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine-1-carboxylate
(24.7 g, 74.5 mmol) was taken up in n class="Chemical">dichloromethane (100 mL) and methanol
(5.5 mL) and then treated with trifluoroacetic acid (250 mL). The
mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. Then the volatiles
were removed under vacuum and the was treated with 2 M NaOH(aq). The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (×2), and
the combined organic washings were dried (MgSO4), filtered,
and concentrated under vacuum to afford the 1-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine 13 as a tan solid (15.6 g, 91%). 1HNMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) 7.40–7.57 (m, 2H), 6.85–7.02 (m, 2H),
3.17–3.30 (m, 4H), 2.98–3.10 (m, 4H).
Authors: Alejandro M Hasslocher-Moreno; Pedro E A A do Brasil; Andrea S de Sousa; Sergio S Xavier; Mayara C Chambela; Gilberto M Sperandio da Silva Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Grasiella Andriani; Emanuele Amata; Joel Beatty; Zeke Clements; Brian J Coffey; Gilles Courtemanche; William Devine; Jessey Erath; Cristin E Juda; Zdzislaw Wawrzak; Jodianne T Wood; Galina I Lepesheva; Ana Rodriguez; Michael P Pollastri Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Martine Keenan; Paul W Alexander; Hugo Diao; Wayne M Best; Andrea Khong; Maria Kerfoot; R C Andrew Thompson; Karen L White; David M Shackleford; Eileen Ryan; Alison D Gregg; Susan A Charman; Thomas W von Geldern; Ivan Scandale; Eric Chatelain Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Chiung-Kuang Chen; Patricia S Doyle; Liudmila V Yermalitskaya; Zachary B Mackey; Kenny K H Ang; James H McKerrow; Larissa M Podust Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-02-03
Authors: Carolina B Moraes; Karen L White; Stéphanie Braillard; Catherine Perez; Junghyun Goo; Luis Gaspar; David M Shackleford; Anabela Cordeiro-da-Silva; R C Andrew Thompson; Lucio Freitas-Junior; Susan A Charman; Eric Chatelain Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Xiaofang Wang; Monica Cal; Marcel Kaiser; Frederick S Buckner; Galina I Lepesheva; Austin G Sanford; Alexander I Wallick; Paul H Davis; Jonathan L Vennerstrom Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Chao Li; Yu Kawamata; Hugh Nakamura; Julien C Vantourout; Zhiqing Liu; Qinglong Hou; Denghui Bao; Jeremy T Starr; Jinshan Chen; Ming Yan; Phil S Baran Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Robson Xavier Faria; Daniel Tadeu Gomes Gonzaga; Paulo Anastácio Furtado Pacheco; André Luis Almeida Souza; Vitor Francisco Ferreira; Fernando de Carvalho da Silva Journal: J Bioenerg Biomembr Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: Kátia da Silva Fonseca; Luísa Perin; Nívia Carolina Nogueira de Paiva; Beatriz Cristiane da Silva; Thays Helena Chaves Duarte; Flávia de Souza Marques; Guilherme de Paula Costa; Israel Molina; Rodrigo Correa-Oliveira; Paula Melo de Abreu Vieira; Cláudia Martins Carneiro Journal: Pathogens Date: 2021-06-09