Literature DB >> 24303852

Do part-whole relations produce facilitation in the picture-word interference task?

Kevin Sailor1, Patricia J Brooks.   

Abstract

Three experiments used the picture-word interference task to evaluate competing models of lexical access in spoken word production. Both the presence of a part-whole relation and association between the target and the interfering word were manipulated. Part terms associated with targets produced facilitation at early stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; -300 ms in Experiment 1, -300 and -150 ms in Experiment 3), but not at SOA 0 ms. Otherwise, part terms tended to produce interference, with unassociated part terms producing a significant semantic interference effect (SIE) at SOA of 0 ms in Experiment 1, and a similar trend in Experiment 3. Experiment 2 replicated the materials and procedure of Costa, Alario, and Caramazza ( 2005 , Experiment 2. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 125-131), yet failed to find any semantic facilitation at SOA 0 ms. We propose that these findings are consistent with lexical competition accounts of SIE but difficult to explain in terms of the plausibility of the interfering words as responses to the target.

Keywords:  Associative priming; Lexical access; Picture–word interference; Semantic interference

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24303852     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.870589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  5 in total

1.  Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors.

Authors:  Markus F Damian; Katharina Spalek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-20

2.  The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access.

Authors:  Harrison E Vieth; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-16

3.  Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: "The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access".

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; David Vinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10

4.  Let's Not Miss the Forest for the Trees: A Reply to Montefinese and Vinson's (2015) Commentary on Vieth et al. (2014).

Authors:  Harrison E Vieth; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06

5.  When Wine and Apple Both Help the Production of Grapes: ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in Picture Naming.

Authors:  Grégoire Python; Raphaël Fargier; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.