| Literature DB >> 24303086 |
Min Liu1, Bin Zhou, Zhong-Yuan Xia, Bo Zhao, Shao-Qing Lei, Qing-Jun Yang, Rui Xue, Yan Leng, Jin-Jin Xu, Zhengyuan Xia.
Abstract
Ischemia postconditioning (IpostC) is an effective way to alleviate ischemia and reperfusion injury; however, the protective effects seem to be impaired in candidates with diabetes mellitus. To gain deep insight into this phenomenon, we explored the role of DJ-1, a novel oncogene, that may exhibit powerful antioxidant capacity in postconditioning cardioprotection in a rat model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Compared with normal group, cardiac DJ-1 was downregulated in diabetes. Larger postischemic infarct size as well as exaggeration of oxidative stress was observed, while IpostC reversed the above changes in normal but not in diabetic rats. DJ-1 was increased after ischemia and postconditioning contributed to a further elevation; however, no alteration of DJ-1 was documented in all subgroups of diabetic rats. Alteration of the cardioprotective PI3K/Akt signaling proteins may be responsible for the ineffectiveness of postconditioning in diabetes. There is a positive correlation relationship between p-Akt and DJ-1 but a negative correlation between infarct size and DJ-1, which may partially explain the interaction of DJ-1 and IpostC cardioprotection. Our result indicates a beneficial role of DJ-1 in myocardial ischemia reperfusion. Downregulation of cardiac DJ-1 may be responsible for the compromised diabetic heart responsiveness to IpostC cardioprotection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24303086 PMCID: PMC3835206 DOI: 10.1155/2013/564902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Changes in body weight and fasting blood glucose of control and diabetic rats before and after 12 weeks of STZ or vehicle injection.
| Normal | Diabetes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 W | 12 W | 0 W | 12 W | |
| Body weight (g) | 239.5 ± 7.4 | 418.7 ± 15.0 | 235.2 ± 6.7 | 204.5 ± 7.2*** |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 6.6 ± 1.1 | 7.5 ± 1.6 | 7.1 ± 1.2 | 25.7 ± 4.5*** |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001 versus normal rats 12 weeks later after STZ injection.
Figure 1Shown are the area at risk from the left ventricle (AAR/LV) and infarcted area from the area at risk (IA/AAR) in percent means ± SD (n = 6 each). The blue-stained areas represent nonischemic tissue, and red stained areas represent the area at risk. Pale areas indicate infarct areas. (a) AAR/LV of normal and diabetic heart suffering from MI/R. There was no significant difference in AAR/LV between the four groups (P > 0.05). (b) IA/AAR of normal and diabetic heart which was subjected to MI/R with or without ischemic postconditioning. *P < 0.05 & **P < 0.01 versus N + IR group; no difference between DM + IR group and DM + IPO group.
Figure 2Index of oxidative stress in different groups was analyzed by ANOVA. (a) The level of Total Antioxidant Capacity (T-AOC). (b) The activity of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD). (c) The level of Malondialdehyde (MDA). (d) The level 15-F2t-Isoprostane. Values presented are mean ± SD (n = 6 each). ▲ P < 0.05 & ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus N + S group; *P < 0.05 & **P < 0.01 versus respective sham group# P < 0.05 versus respective IR group.
Figure 3Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on the protein expression of DJ-1. There were three different normal blank control rats (on the left side) and three different diabetic blank control rats (on the right side). All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6 each). **P < 0.01 versus normal rats.
Figure 4Immunoblot and densitometry analysis of the protein expression of DJ-1, PTEN, phosphorylated, and total Akt in normal and diabetic myocardial tissue. GAPDH was set as a loading control. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 6 each). (a) Western blot of DJ-1, PTEN, p-Akt, total Akt, and GAPDH. (b) Statistical analysis of DJ-1 among different groups. (c) Statistical analysis of PTEN among different groups. (d) Statistical analysis of p-Akt among different groups. (e) Statistical analysis of total Akt among different groups. ▲ P < 0.05 & ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus N + S group; *P < 0.05 & **P < 0.01 & ***P < 0.001 versus respective sham group; # P < 0.05 versus respective IR group; ### P < 0.001 versus respective IR group.
Figure 5Simple linear regression between DJ-1 and myocardial infarct size together with p-Akt. (a) Linear regression between DJ-1 and IA/AAR. (b) Linear regression between DJ-1 and p-Akt.