Literature DB >> 24302792

Immunostimulant Activity of a Novel Polysaccharide Isolated from Lactarius deliciosus (L. ex Fr.) Gray.

Y Hou1, X Ding, W Hou, B Song, T Wang, F Wang, J Zhong.   

Abstract

More and more fungal polysaccharides have been reported to exhibit a variety of biological activities, including antitumor, antioxidant and immunostimulant activity. The non-starch polysaccharides have emerged as an important class of bioactive natural products. In this study, the immune activities of a novel polysaccharide (LDG-A) isolated from Lactarius deliciosus (L. ex Fr.) Gray were investigated at 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg dose levels. The inhibitory rate in mice treated with 80 mg/kg LDG-A can reach 68.422%, being the highest in the three doses, which may be comparable to mannatide. Histology of immune organs showed that the tissues were arranged in more regular and firm pattern, but the tumor tissue arranged looser in LDG-A group than those in control group. Meanwhile, there was no obvious damage to other organs, such as heart, lung, and kidney. The antitumor activity of the LDG-A was usually believed to be a consequence of the stimulation of the cell-mediated immune response because it can significantly promote the lymphocyte and macrophage cells in the dose range of 50-200 μg/ml and 100-400 μg/ml in vitro, respectively. The level of cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and NO) of macrophage cells induced by LDG-A treatment was similar to lipopolysaccharides at different concentrations. The expression of all these genes studied (TNF-α, IL-6, and iNOS mRNA) in the untreated macrophage was little, but increased dramatically in a dose-dependent manner in the LDG-A-treated cells. The results obtained in the present study indicated that the purified polysaccharide of L. deliciosus (L. ex Fr.) Gray is a potential source of natural immune-stimulating substances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactarius deliciosus (L. ex Fr.) Gray; Polysaccharide; immune activities; mechanisms

Year:  2013        PMID: 24302792      PMCID: PMC3831719          DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.119809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0250-474X            Impact factor:   0.975


A fungus is a member of a large group of eukaryotic organisms that includes microorganisms such as yeasts and molds, as well as the more familiar mushrooms. Fungal polysaccharide is a kind of active organic compounds that is found in the fruiting bodies, mycelium and fermentation broth of large edible and medicinal fungi[1]. Fungal polysaccharides are long carbohydrate molecules, of repeating units joined together by glycosidic bonds. They are often linear, but may also be highly branched[2]. In recent years, as more and more fungal polysaccharides have been reported to exhibit a variety of biological activities, including antitumor, antioxidant and immunostimulant activity. Non-starch polysaccharides have emerged as an important class of bioactive natural products[345678]. Certain mushrooms enjoy usage as therapeutics in folk medicines, such as traditional Chinese medicine. Notable medicinal mushrooms with a well documented history of use include Agaricus subrufescens[910], Ganoderma lucidum[11], and Ophiocordyceps sinensis[12]. The shiitake mushroom is a source of lentinan, a clinical drug approved for use in cancer treatments in several countries, including Japan[1314]. In Europe and Japan, polysaccharide-K (Krestin), a chemical derived from Trametes versicolor, is an approved adjuvant for cancer therapy[15]. Lactarius deliciosus (L. ex Fr.) Gray is a kind of fungi belonging to Lactarius which grows in Xiaojin country of Sichuan province in China at an elevation of 3750 m. In our previous work, one novel water-soluble polysaccharide was extracted and purified from the fruiting bodies of L. deliciosus using a DEAE cellulose column chromatography and a Sephadex G-100 column chromatography. Its chemical structures have been characterized[16]. The present objective is to investigate the immune activities and molecular mechanisms of the novel polysaccharide isolated from L. deliciosus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

S180 tumor cells were maintained in peritoneal cavities of Kunming strain male mice obtained from Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Immunology of North Sichuan Medical College (NSMC). Nanchong, China. Male Kunming strain mice, weighed 25.0±1.0 g, purchased from NSMC, were housed six per plastic cages with wood chip bedding in an animal room with a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle at room temperature (25±2°) and allowed free access to standard laboratory diet (purchased from the Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Immunology of the NSMC). The animal experiments were conducted according to the ‘Guidelines for Animal Experimentation’ of the NSMC.

Isolation for polysaccharide:

The fruiting bodies of L. deliciosus was collected in Xiaojing country of Sichuan province, China, and was authenticated at College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China and a voucher specimen has been preserved in Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, College of Life Sciences, China West Normal University. After the fruiting bodies of L. deliciosus were soaked with 95% EtOH, the residue was dried and then extracted with boiling water for three times (5 h each). Subsequently, the filtrate was concentrated, dialyzed against distilled water through a semipermeable membrane with a cutoff threshold of 5000 D, and centrifuged, the supernatant was added with three volumes of 95% EtOH to precipitate crude polysaccharides. Sevag method[17] was used for the deproteination, crude polysaccharides named LDG (2 g) was subjected to a DEAE cellulose column and eluted stepwise with 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 1.0 m NaCl. The eluent was monitored by the phenolsulfuric acid method[18]. The 0.1 M NaCl elution was concentrated, lyophilized, and purified on a Sephadex G-100 column (2.6×60 cm). The purified L. deliciosus polysaccharide, named LDG-A, was obtained by the above processes and the yield rate of LDG-A was 0.215% (0.430 g) for the starting material. Structural features of L. deliciosus polysaccharide (LDG-A) were investigated by a combination of total hydrolysis, methylation analysis, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), infrared (IR) spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and dynamical analysis of the atomic force microscope (AFM) studies. The results indicated that L. deliciosus polysaccharide (LDG-A) have a backbone of 1, 6-disubstituted-α-L-mannopyranose which branches at O-2 and the branches were mainly composed of a (2 → 3)-α-D-xylopyranose residue (figs. 1 and 2).
Fig. 1

The crystal structure of polysaccharide LDG-A under the scanning electron microscope.

Fig. 2

Predicted chemical structure of polysaccharide LDG-A.

The crystal structure of polysaccharide LDG-A under the scanning electron microscope. Predicted chemical structure of polysaccharide LDG-A.

Assay of antitumor activity in vivo:

S180 tumor cells (3×106) were implanted subcutaneously into right hind groin of the mice. Mice were randomly divided into five groups (n=6). One day after the inoculation, LDG-A was dissolved in distilled water and administered intraperitoneally to the mice at the doses of 20, 40, and 80 mg/kg, respectively. Positive and negative controls were set for comparison. The positive control was given with 0.2 ml mannatide (20 mg/kg) and negative one with physiological saline instead of the test solution. Animals were sacrificed after 2 weeks. The body weights were measured. Tumors, spleens, and livers were excised and the tumor inhibitory ratio were calculated by following formula: Inhibition ratio (%)=[(A-B)/A]×100, where A and B were the average tumor weights of the negative control and treated groups, respectively. The organ index was calculated by following formula: Organ index=C/D, where C was the weight of the organ and D was the weight of the mice.

Histopathology and morphological observations:

After treating the mice with LDG-A as described above, a portion of the tissues were cut into small pieces, fixed in Heidenhain's Susa Fluid (HgCl2: 4.5 g; NaCl: 0.5 g; distilled water: 80.0 ml; formalin: 20.0 ml; acetic acid: 4.0 ml; trichloroaceticacid: 2.0 ml), and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), examined and photographed under an Olympus microscope.

Preparation of lymphocyte cells:

The homogenized spleens were treated in aseptic condition. Single spleen cells suspension were prepared in pH 7.0 phosphate-buffered saline (0.15 mol/l of NaCl and 0.02 mol/l sodium phosphate)containing 0.1% w/v bovine serum albumin by forcing spleen fragments through a fine wire mesh. Samples were washed twice in phosphate buffered saline/0.1% w/v bovine serum albumin and in low speed centrifugation, 200 rpm, 5 min. The cells were resuspended to a concentration of 5×106 cells/ml in RPMI1640 completely cultivated liquid (HyClone, USA).

Assay of lymphocyte proliferation:

One hundred microliters (5×106 cells/ml) single spleen cells sample was placed on a 96 well microplate and cultured for 24 h. Twenty microliters LDG-A of different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200 μg/ml) was added to each test well as the experimental group, 20 μl ConA (50 μg/ml) was added as a positive control group, and 20 μl RPMI-1640 (Gibco, USA) cultivated liquid as a blank control group. And then 80 μl RPMI-1640 cultivated liquid was added to each well for the total volume of 200 μl. Eight repeated wells were used for each concentration. The cell samples were incubated in a 5% CO2-air mixture at 37° for 68 h. MTT cellular viability assay was used for lymphocyte proliferation analysis. Calculation of lymphocyte proliferation was done: Rate of lymphocyte proliferation (%)=[(T−C)/C]×100, where T is optical density value of test well; C is that of control well.

Preparation of peritoneal macrophage cells:

BALB/c mice of 6 to 8 week old were injected intraperitoneally with 1 ml of 3% thioglycollate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Four days after injection, mice were euthanized and peritoneal exudate cells were collected by lavage with 5 ml of sterile cold D-Hank's. The exudate cells were collected and cultured in 60-mm dishes with RPMI-1640 containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS, penicillin (100 IU/ml) and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) (RPMI-FBS). After 1-h incubation at 37°, the cultures were washed twice with RPMI-1640 to remove non-adherent cells and the adherent cells were collected by gently scraped. The viability of macrophages was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.

Assay of macrophage stimulation:

Macrophages (1×106 cells/ml) were plated in a 96 well plate (Corning, NY). The cells were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI-FBS medium containing increasing concentrations of LDG-A from 50 to 400 μg/ml (20 μl per well) as the experimental group, and 20 μl LPS (50 μg/ml) was added as positive control group, respectively. And then 80 μl phenol red free RPMI-FBS cultivated liquid was added to each well for the total volume of 200 μl for each test. Eight repeated wells were used for each concentration. The cell samples were incubated in a 5% CO2-air mixture at 37° for 4 h. Then 50 μl of neutral red solution was added to a final concentration of 0.72 mg/l and continue to culture for 30 min; aspirated the neutral red solution, washed three times and added 200 μl lysis buffer (glacial acetic acid:ethanol=1:1), standing overnight until complete cell lysis and recorded the optical density (OD).

Nitric oxide determination:

The amount of stable nitrite and 100 ml of culture supernatants were mixed with an equal volume of the Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride, and 2.5% H3PO4). This mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance at 540 nm was read on a Thermo multiskan ascent reader (NY, USA). The nitrite concentration was determined by extrapolation based on a standard sodium nitrite curve[19].

Cytokines determination:

The amount of TNF-α and IL-6 of culture supernatants were determined by ELISA kit (R and D Systems China Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) following the instruction of manufacturers.

Quantitative RT-PCR detection of related gene expression:

The peritoneal macrophages were harvested after stimulated by various concentration of LDG-A for 4 h. The total cellular RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using oligo (dT)18 primers (Invitrogen). Amplification of each target cDNA was performed in the iCycler system (Bio-Rad, USA). PCR products were quantified using SYBR Green I. β-actin was used as an endogenous control to normalize expression levels among samples. A standard curve of each primer set was generated using LPS-induced macrophage cDNA. The PCR primers chosen were shown in Table 1. The relative expression abundance was calculated by the following formula: Relative expression abundance=mols of detected mRNA/mols of β-actin mRNA
TABLE 1

PRIMER DESIGNS

PRIMER DESIGNS

Statistical analysis:

The data were expressed as mean±SD. The significance of difference was evaluated with one-way ANOVA, followed by Student's t-test to statistically identify differences between the control and treated groups. Significant differences was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The antitumor activity of the polysaccharide was usually believed to be a consequence of the stimulation of the cell-mediated immune response[20]. To detect the antitumor activity of LDG-A in vivo, we used the mice transplanted S180 to evaluate the effects and the results were summarized in Table 2. The weight and the histological preparations of the vital organ in each female rat in the control group were compared to that in the treated group in order to measure the effect of the drug. LDG-A could inhibit the growth of the tumors (P<0.05) in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibitory rate in mice treated with 80 mg/kg LDG-A was 68.422%, being the highest in the three doses. Furthermore, during the experiments, the appetite, activity, and coat luster of every mice in LDG-A treated groups were better than the mice treated with mannatide. Histology of immune organs such as the liver, spleen, and thymus showed that tissues appear more regular and firmer, and the tumor tissues are more loosely arranged in LDG-A group than those in control group. But there is no obvious damage to other organs, such as heart, lung, and kidney (figs. 3 and 4). The results also showed little change in average liver weight in test groups, indicating that LDG-A did not cause serious liver damage. On the 14th day, the average tumor weight of negative control mice was 3.74 g, whereas the average tumor weight of mice in LDG-A group at dose of 80 mg/kg was 1.181g; tumor weights were also reduced in doses of 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, to 2.081 g and 1.783 g, respectively (P<0.05). It is noteworthy that the average weights of the spleens and thymus in test groups were greater in doses of 40 mg/kg than that in the mannatide mice (P<0.05), and even that of the negative control mice, indicating that LDG-A could increase the weights of immune organs in moderate doses (Table 2). These results suggested that activating immune responses in the host might be one of the mechanisms of antitumor activity of LDG-A, as various reports are available for antitumor polysaccharides.
TABLE 2

ANTITUMOR ACTIVITIES OF LDG-A ON S180 TUMOR

Fig. 3

Histological preparations of immune organs.

Histological preparations of the liver (e), spleen (f), thymus (g), tumor (h) in LDG-A group (concentration of 80 mg/kg) compared with respective control group (a,b,c,d).

Fig. 4

Histological preparations of other organs.

Histological preparations of the heart (d), lung (e), kidney (f) in LDG-A group (concentration of 80 mg/kg) compared with respective control group (a,b,c).

ANTITUMOR ACTIVITIES OF LDG-A ON S180 TUMOR Histological preparations of immune organs. Histological preparations of the liver (e), spleen (f), thymus (g), tumor (h) in LDG-A group (concentration of 80 mg/kg) compared with respective control group (a,b,c,d). Histological preparations of other organs. Histological preparations of the heart (d), lung (e), kidney (f) in LDG-A group (concentration of 80 mg/kg) compared with respective control group (a,b,c). The antitumor activity of the polysaccharide was usually believed to be a consequence of the stimulation of the cell-mediated immune response. The present study showed the immune activity of the LDG-A by assay of lymphocyte proliferation and macrophage stimulation. Proliferation of splenocytes is an indicator of immune activation. The purified polysaccharide LDG-A was able to induce proliferation of splenocytes as shown in fig. 5. LDG-A can significantly promote the proliferation of spleen cells at the concentration of 5 μg/ml and 25 μg/ml dose (P<0.05), while it can promote the proliferation of spleen cells in the concentration of 50-200 μg/ml dose range compared with the control group (P<0.05).
Fig. 5

Effect of LDG-A on in vitro proliferation of mouse spleen cell. Results are expressed as mean±SD where n=8. B: Blank control group; C: ConA group; A: LDG-A group. Significant differences from negative control group and positive control group were evaluated using Student's t test: *P<0.05.

Effect of LDG-A on in vitro proliferation of mouse spleen cell. Results are expressed as mean±SD where n=8. B: Blank control group; C: ConA group; A: LDG-A group. Significant differences from negative control group and positive control group were evaluated using Student's t test: *P<0.05. Polysaccharides are good stimulators of macrophage owing to presence of various receptors on the macrophage membrane. In this study, LDG-A also can significantly promote the phagocytosis of mouse peritoneal macrophages at the concentration 50 μg/ml dose (P<0.05), and can very significantly promote the phagocytosis of mouse peritoneal macrophages within the dose range of 100-400 μg/ml compared with the control group (P<0.05, fig. 6). The promoter capacity of both lymphocyte and macrophage cells and the concentration of the LDG-A was positively correlated.
Fig. 6

Effect of LDG-A, ConA, and LPS on mouse macrophage cell. B: Blank control group; L: LPS group; A: LDG-A group. Significant differences from negative control group and positive control group were evaluated using Student's t test: *P<0.05.

Effect of LDG-A, ConA, and LPS on mouse macrophage cell. B: Blank control group; L: LPS group; A: LDG-A group. Significant differences from negative control group and positive control group were evaluated using Student's t test: *P<0.05. Using the ELISA method, the level of IL-6 and TNF-α secreted by LDG-A-activated macrophages was compared with control. Obviously, the level of both cytokines secreted by LDG-A-stimulated macrophages was much higher than medium-treated macrophages. LPS of 50 mg/ml was the positive control. The level of cytokines induced by LDG-A treatment was similar to that induced by LPS at a different concentration. It is noted that the productions of IL-6 were stimulated at a high level when the concentration of LDG-A was only 50 mg/ml (Table 3).
TABLE 3

PRODUCTION OF NO AND CYTOKINES IN PM STIMULATED BY LDG-A

PRODUCTION OF NO AND CYTOKINES IN PM STIMULATED BY LDG-A Quantitative RT-PCR results showed a significant increase in the level of TNF-α, IL-6, and iNOS mRNA in LDG-A-treated peritoneal macrophages compared to those untreated. The positive control, LPS 50 mg/ml, also promoted the expression of these genes. The expression of the genes studied (TNF-α, IL-6, and iNOS) in the untreated macrophage were 0.01, 0.11 and 0.01, respectively, but increased dramatically to 0.49, 1.77, and 1.10 in a dose-dependent manner in the LDG-A-treated (400 mg/ml) cells, respectively (Table 4).
TABLE 4

EXPRESSION OF TNF-α, INOS AND IL-6 mRNA IN PM STIMULATED BY LDG-A

EXPRESSION OF TNF-α, INOS AND IL-6 mRNA IN PM STIMULATED BY LDG-A The role of activated macrophages in the defense against tumor cells has been investigated extensively over the last decades[212223]. Accumulated evidence indicated that activated macrophages are able to recognize and lyse tumor cells including those that are resistant to cytostatic drugs. Therefore, macrophage activation can play a role in novel immunotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of cancer[23]. Macrophages can kill the tumor cells either by macrophage-mediated tumor cytotoxicity or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and both processes end up releasing cytotoxic mediators including TNF-α, NO and reactive oxygen intermediates or phagocytosis[24]. TNF-α is one of most important mediators involved in tumor cell killing by the induction of multiple intracellular pathways, such as the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates in mitochondria preceding plasma membrane permeabilization[25] and induction of iNOS expression. Ultimately, these processes can lead to cell death. LDG-A could increase the secretion of TNF-α from macrophage and the expression of TNF-α mRNA in vitro. The toxic effects of NO and its derivatives on target cells are due to several mechanisms[26]. Our results demonstrated that LDG-A increased NO release and induced expression of iNOS gene to several folds in vitro. It is rational to assume that the release of TNF-α and NO of macrophage which is activated by LDG-A may be the important mechanism of the antitumor effect of LDG-A. However, further evidence is required. It is well known that IL-6 is also considered as a major immune and inflammatory mediator in cancer. This research indicated that macrophages were induced to enhance the secretion and expression of the cytokines IL-6 by LDG-A. These results point that these cytokines may be involved in the antitumor effect of LDG-A.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Medicinal mushrooms and cancer therapy: translating a traditional practice into Western medicine.

Authors:  Richard Sullivan; John E Smith; Neil J Rowan
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 2.  A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi.

Authors:  David S Hibbett; Manfred Binder; Joseph F Bischoff; Meredith Blackwell; Paul F Cannon; Ove E Eriksson; Sabine Huhndorf; Timothy James; Paul M Kirk; Robert Lücking; H Thorsten Lumbsch; François Lutzoni; P Brandon Matheny; David J McLaughlin; Martha J Powell; Scott Redhead; Conrad L Schoch; Joseph W Spatafora; Joost A Stalpers; Rytas Vilgalys; M Catherine Aime; André Aptroot; Robert Bauer; Dominik Begerow; Gerald L Benny; Lisa A Castlebury; Pedro W Crous; Yu-Cheng Dai; Walter Gams; David M Geiser; Gareth W Griffith; Cécile Gueidan; David L Hawksworth; Geir Hestmark; Kentaro Hosaka; Richard A Humber; Kevin D Hyde; Joseph E Ironside; Urmas Kõljalg; Cletus P Kurtzman; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Robert Lichtwardt; Joyce Longcore; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Andrew Miller; Jean-Marc Moncalvo; Sharon Mozley-Standridge; Franz Oberwinkler; Erast Parmasto; Valérie Reeb; Jack D Rogers; Claude Roux; Leif Ryvarden; José Paulo Sampaio; Arthur Schüssler; Junta Sugiyama; R Greg Thorn; Leif Tibell; Wendy A Untereiner; Christopher Walker; Zheng Wang; Alex Weir; Michael Weiss; Merlin M White; Katarina Winka; Yi-Jian Yao; Ning Zhang
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2007-03-13

Review 3.  A potential role of macrophage activation in the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  A H Klimp; E G E de Vries; G L Scherphof; T Daemen
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 4.  Therapy of cancer metastasis by systemic activation of macrophages: from the bench to the clinic.

Authors:  I J Fidler; E S Kleinerman
Journal:  Res Immunol       Date:  1993-05

5.  Comparison of in vitro cell cytotoxic assays for tumor necrosis factor.

Authors:  D A Flick; G E Gifford
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1984-03-30       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  Chemical glycobiology.

Authors:  C R Bertozzi; L L Kiessling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Ganoderma - a therapeutic fungal biofactory.

Authors:  R Russell M Paterson
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 8.  Mushrooms, tumors, and immunity.

Authors:  A T Borchers; J S Stern; R M Hackman; C L Keen; M E Gershwin
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1999-09

9.  Direct evidence for tumor necrosis factor-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen intermediates and their involvement in cytotoxicity.

Authors:  V Goossens; J Grooten; K De Vos; W Fiers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The Medicinal Mushroom Agaricus blazei Murrill: Review of Literature and Pharmaco-Toxicological Problems.

Authors:  F Firenzuoli; L Gori; G Lombardo
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effect on macrophage proliferation of a novel polysaccharide from Lactarius deliciosus (L. ex Fr.) Gray.

Authors:  Yiling Hou; Meng Wang; Daqun Zhao; Lu Liu; Xiang Ding; Wanru Hou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Introducing a novel mushroom from mycophagy community with emphasis on biomedical potency.

Authors:  Somanjana Khatua; Arun Kumar Dutta; Swarnendu Chandra; Soumitra Paloi; Kanad Das; Krishnendu Acharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Alkali treated antioxidative crude polysaccharide from Russula alatoreticula potentiates murine macrophages by tunning TLR/NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Somanjana Khatua; Krishnendu Acharya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluation of Polish wild Mushrooms as Beta-Glucan Sources.

Authors:  Iwona Mirończuk-Chodakowska; Anna Maria Witkowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The primate gut mycobiome-bacteriome interface is impacted by environmental and subsistence factors.

Authors:  Ashok K Sharma; Sam Davison; Barbora Pafco; Jonathan B Clayton; Jessica M Rothman; Matthew R McLennan; Marie Cibot; Terence Fuh; Roman Vodicka; Carolyn Jost Robinson; Klara Petrzelkova; Andres Gomez
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 8.462

6.  Protective Effects of the Mushroom Lactarius deterrimus Extract on Systemic Oxidative Stress and Pancreatic Islets in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats.

Authors:  Mirjana Mihailović; Jelena Arambašić Јovanović; Aleksandra Uskoković; Nevena Grdović; Svetlana Dinić; Senka Vidović; Goran Poznanović; Ibrahim Mujić; Melita Vidaković
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.011

7.  Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Antiglycation Effects of Lactarius deterrimus and Castanea sativa Extracts on Hepatorenal Injury in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats.

Authors:  Jelena Arambašić Jovanović; Mirjana Mihailović; Aleksandra S Uskoković; Nevena Grdović; Svetlana Dinić; Goran Poznanović; Ibrahim Mujić; Melita Vidaković
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.