Literature DB >> 24301071

Automatic treatment plan re-optimization for adaptive radiotherapy guided with the initial plan DVHs.

Nan Li1, Masoud Zarepisheh, Andres Uribe-Sanchez, Kevin Moore, Zhen Tian, Xin Zhen, Yan Jiang Graves, Quentin Gautier, Loren Mell, Linghong Zhou, Xun Jia, Steve Jiang.   

Abstract

Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) can reduce normal tissue toxicity and/or improve tumor control through treatment adaptations based on the current patient anatomy. Developing an efficient and effective re-planning algorithm is an important step toward the clinical realization of ART. For the re-planning process, manual trial-and-error approach to fine-tune planning parameters is time-consuming and is usually considered unpractical, especially for online ART. It is desirable to automate this step to yield a plan of acceptable quality with minimal interventions. In ART, prior information in the original plan is available, such as dose-volume histogram (DVH), which can be employed to facilitate the automatic re-planning process. The goal of this work is to develop an automatic re-planning algorithm to generate a plan with similar, or possibly better, DVH curves compared with the clinically delivered original plan. Specifically, our algorithm iterates the following two loops. An inner loop is the traditional fluence map optimization, in which we optimize a quadratic objective function penalizing the deviation of the dose received by each voxel from its prescribed or threshold dose with a set of fixed voxel weighting factors. In outer loop, the voxel weighting factors in the objective function are adjusted according to the deviation of the current DVH curves from those in the original plan. The process is repeated until the DVH curves are acceptable or maximum iteration step is reached. The whole algorithm is implemented on GPU for high efficiency. The feasibility of our algorithm has been demonstrated with three head-and-neck cancer IMRT cases, each having an initial planning CT scan and another treatment CT scan acquired in the middle of treatment course. Compared with the DVH curves in the original plan, the DVH curves in the resulting plan using our algorithm with 30 iterations are better for almost all structures. The re-optimization process takes about 30 s using our in-house optimization engine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24301071     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/24/8725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

Review 1.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Modified simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for an unresectable huge refractory pelvic tumor diagnosed as a rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takuma Nomiya; Hiroko Akamatsu; Mayumi Harada; Ibuki Ota; Yasuhito Hagiwara; Mayumi Ichikawa; Misako Miwa; Shouhei Kawashiro; Motohisa Hagiwara; Masahiro Chin; Eiji Hashizume; Kenji Nemoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for different treatment machines: A template-based approach using constrained optimization.

Authors:  Luise A Künzel; Oliver S Dohm; Markus Alber; Daniel Zips; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Inverse 4D conformal planning for lung SBRT using particle swarm optimization.

Authors:  A Modiri; X Gu; A Hagan; R Bland; P Iyengar; R Timmerman; A Sawant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Modeling physician's preference in treatment plan approval of stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yin Gao; Chenyang Shen; Yesenia Gonzalez; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  Simultaneous Image Reconstruction and Element Decomposition for Iodine Contrast Agent Visualization in Multienergy Element-Resolved Cone Beam CT.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Hyunuk Jung; Ming Yang; Chenyang Shen; Xun Jia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  An Automated Treatment Plan Quality Control Tool for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using a Voxel-Weighting Factor-Based Re-Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  Ting Song; Nan Li; Masoud Zarepisheh; Yongbao Li; Quentin Gautier; Linghong Zhou; Loren Mell; Steve Jiang; Laura Cerviño
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Physically constrained voxel-based penalty adaptation for ultra-fast IMRT planning.

Authors:  Niklas Wahl; Mark Bangert; Cornelis P Kamerling; Peter Ziegenhein; Gijsbert H Bol; Bas W Raaymakers; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A Fast Online Replanning Algorithm Based on Intensity Field Projection for Adaptive Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Liu; Yueqiang Liang; Jian Zhu; Gang Yu; Yanyan Yu; Qiang Cao; X Allen Li; Baosheng Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Prescription Value-Based Automatic Optimization of Importance Factors in Inverse Planning.

Authors:  Caiping Guo; Pengcheng Zhang; Zhiguo Gui; Huazhong Shu; Lihong Zhai; Jinrong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.