Isaac See1, Nadine Shehab, Scott R Kegler, S Raja Laskar, Daniel S Budnitz. 1. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Science, Education, and Laboratory Services, and Division of Analysis, Research, and Practice Integration, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; and Cardiology Division, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent data on digoxin prescribing and adverse events are lacking but could help inform the management of digoxin in contemporary heart failure treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined nationally representative numbers and rates of emergency department (ED) visits for digoxin toxicity in the United States using 2005 to 2010 reports from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project and the National Ambulatory (and Hospital Ambulatory) Medical Care Surveys. Based on 441 cases, an estimated 5156 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2663-7648) ED visits for digoxin toxicity occurred annually in the United States; more than three fourths (78.8% [95% CI, 73.5%-84.1%]) resulted in hospitalization. Serum digoxin level was ≥2.0 ng/mL for 95.8% (95% CI, 93.2%-98.4%) of estimated ED visits with levels reported (n=251 cases). The rate of ED visits per 10 000 outpatient prescription visits among patients≥85 years was twice that of patients 40 to 84 years (rate ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.2-5.0]); among women, the rate was twice that of men (rate ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.1-4.7]). Digoxin toxicity accounted for an estimated 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6%-1.4%) of ED visits for all adverse drug events among patients≥40 years, but an estimated 3.3% (95% CI, 2.3%-4.4%) of ED visits and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.0%-7.9%) of hospitalizations for all adverse drug events among patients≥85 years. Estimated annual ED visits and hospitalizations remained relatively constant from 2005 to 2010. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin toxicity is not declining; more careful prescribing to high-risk groups and improved monitoring of serum levels might be needed to reduce morbidity from outpatient digoxin use.
BACKGROUND: Recent data on digoxin prescribing and adverse events are lacking but could help inform the management of digoxin in contemporary heart failure treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined nationally representative numbers and rates of emergency department (ED) visits for digoxintoxicity in the United States using 2005 to 2010 reports from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project and the National Ambulatory (and Hospital Ambulatory) Medical Care Surveys. Based on 441 cases, an estimated 5156 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2663-7648) ED visits for digoxintoxicity occurred annually in the United States; more than three fourths (78.8% [95% CI, 73.5%-84.1%]) resulted in hospitalization. Serum digoxin level was ≥2.0 ng/mL for 95.8% (95% CI, 93.2%-98.4%) of estimated ED visits with levels reported (n=251 cases). The rate of ED visits per 10 000 outpatient prescription visits among patients≥85 years was twice that of patients 40 to 84 years (rate ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.2-5.0]); among women, the rate was twice that of men (rate ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.1-4.7]). Digoxintoxicity accounted for an estimated 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6%-1.4%) of ED visits for all adverse drug events among patients≥40 years, but an estimated 3.3% (95% CI, 2.3%-4.4%) of ED visits and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.0%-7.9%) of hospitalizations for all adverse drug events among patients≥85 years. Estimated annual ED visits and hospitalizations remained relatively constant from 2005 to 2010. CONCLUSIONS:Digoxintoxicity is not declining; more careful prescribing to high-risk groups and improved monitoring of serum levels might be needed to reduce morbidity from outpatientdigoxin use.
Entities:
Keywords:
digoxin; drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; emergency service, hospital; heart failure; hospitalization
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie Curry; Leora I Horwitz; Heather Sipsma; Jennifer W Thompson; MaryAnne Elma; Mary Norine Walsh; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William T Abraham; Philip B Adamson; Robert C Bourge; Mark F Aaron; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Lynne W Stevenson; Warren Strickland; Suresh Neelagaru; Nirav Raval; Steven Krueger; Stanislav Weiner; David Shavelle; Bradley Jeffries; Jay S Yadav Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matthew L Maciejewski; Xiaojuan Mi; Lesley H Curtis; Judy Ng; Samuel C Haffer; Bradley G Hammill Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-10-18
Authors: Mustafa Adem Tatlisu; Kazim Serhan Ozcan; Baris Gungor; Ahmet Zengin; Mehmet Baran Karatas; Zekeriya Nurkalem Journal: J Geriatr Cardiol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Ivan Lo Giudice; Eleonora Mocciaro; Claudia Giardina; Maria Antonietta Barbieri; Giuseppe Cicala; Maria Gioffrè-Florio; Giuseppe Carpinteri; Aulo Di Grande; Edoardo Spina; Vincenzo Arcoraci; Paola Maria Cutroneo Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 2.483