John Hilton1, Angel Arnaout, Mark Clemons. 1. aDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA bDepartment of Surgery, Ottawa General Hospital cOttawa Hospital Research Institute dDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For women diagnosed with localized hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who have a poor performance status or who have medical conditions precluding aggressive treatment with chemotherapy or surgery, primary endocrine therapy has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative. Given that society is rapidly aging overall, this subset of patients will likely become a greater proportion of the patient population seen by breast cancer specialists. RECENT FINDINGS: On the basis of the results from randomized trials in patients whose health does not permit surgery, it appears that tamoxifen achieves a similar overall survival compared with surgery plus tamoxifen, supporting the use of primary endocrine therapy. In the neoadjuvant setting, aromatase inhibitors appear superior to tamoxifen, suggesting that these agents may be the best choice in the primary endocrine therapy setting. In addition, new breakthroughs for the management of hormone-receptor-positive disease in the metastatic setting have recently been reported. SUMMARY: This review will discuss the rationale and evidence for primary endocrine therapy; which agents could be selected for use; and how recent advances for the management of hormone-receptor-positive disease may potentially apply to this population.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For women diagnosed with localized hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who have a poor performance status or who have medical conditions precluding aggressive treatment with chemotherapy or surgery, primary endocrine therapy has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative. Given that society is rapidly aging overall, this subset of patients will likely become a greater proportion of the patient population seen by breast cancer specialists. RECENT FINDINGS: On the basis of the results from randomized trials in patients whose health does not permit surgery, it appears that tamoxifen achieves a similar overall survival compared with surgery plus tamoxifen, supporting the use of primary endocrine therapy. In the neoadjuvant setting, aromatase inhibitors appear superior to tamoxifen, suggesting that these agents may be the best choice in the primary endocrine therapy setting. In addition, new breakthroughs for the management of hormone-receptor-positive disease in the metastatic setting have recently been reported. SUMMARY: This review will discuss the rationale and evidence for primary endocrine therapy; which agents could be selected for use; and how recent advances for the management of hormone-receptor-positive disease may potentially apply to this population.
Authors: Angel Arnaout; Susan Robertson; Iryna Kuchuk; Demetrios Simos; Gregory R Pond; Christina L Addison; Mehrzad Namazi; Mark Clemons Journal: Int J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-01-20
Authors: Neil Carleton; Azadeh Nasrazadani; Kristine Gade; Sushil Beriwal; Parul N Barry; Adam M Brufsky; Rohit Bhargava; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; G J van Londen; Oscar C Marroquin; Darcy L Thull; Phuong L Mai; Emilia J Diego; Michael T Lotze; Steffi Oesterreich; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Adrian V Lee Journal: Lancet Healthy Longev Date: 2022-01-05