Su-Young Jeon1, Ki-Ho Kim, Ki-Hoon Song. 1. Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) usually has ill-defined margins because of its irregular invasive patterns. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical efficacy of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) in primary cSCC treated using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). METHODS & MATERIALS: We examined 67 cases of biopsy-proven primary facial cSCC treated with MMS. The 67 SCC were divided into the two groups depending on PDD application: PDD group (n = 38, 56.7%) and non-PDD group (n = 29, 43.3%). We analyzed the differences in surgical features between the PDD and non-PDD groups. RESULTS: The PDD group required fewer Mohs stages (1.37 vs 1.83, p = .02) and smaller surgical margins (8.03 vs 11.24 mm, p = .03). PDD showed additional benefits in terms of surgical margin and Mohs stage, especially in low-risk SCC, including thin (≤4 mm), small (≤20 mm), well-differentiated, and nonulcerative tumors (p < .05) but did not show beneficial effects in high-risk SCC (p > .05) during MMS. CONCLUSION: PDD can increase surgical efficacy of primary cSCC during MMS. These benefits are more pronounced in low-risk SCC. We recommend PDD as a simple and useful technique for delineating the margins of low-risk SCC before MMS.
BACKGROUND:Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) usually has ill-defined margins because of its irregular invasive patterns. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical efficacy of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) in primary cSCC treated using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). METHODS & MATERIALS: We examined 67 cases of biopsy-proven primary facial cSCC treated with MMS. The 67 SCC were divided into the two groups depending on PDD application: PDD group (n = 38, 56.7%) and non-PDD group (n = 29, 43.3%). We analyzed the differences in surgical features between the PDD and non-PDD groups. RESULTS: The PDD group required fewer Mohs stages (1.37 vs 1.83, p = .02) and smaller surgical margins (8.03 vs 11.24 mm, p = .03). PDD showed additional benefits in terms of surgical margin and Mohs stage, especially in low-risk SCC, including thin (≤4 mm), small (≤20 mm), well-differentiated, and nonulcerative tumors (p < .05) but did not show beneficial effects in high-risk SCC (p > .05) during MMS. CONCLUSION: PDD can increase surgical efficacy of primary cSCC during MMS. These benefits are more pronounced in low-risk SCC. We recommend PDD as a simple and useful technique for delineating the margins of low-risk SCC before MMS.
Authors: Ethan Walker; Margaret Mann; Kord Honda; Allison Vidimos; Mark D Schluchter; Brian Straight; Matthew Bogyo; Daniel Popkin; James P Basilion Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-11-19 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Samantha L Schneider; Indermeet Kohli; Iltefat H Hamzavi; M Laurin Council; Anthony M Rossi; David M Ozog Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Samantha L Schneider; Indermeet Kohli; Iltefat H Hamzavi; M Laurin Council; Anthony M Rossi; David M Ozog Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 11.527