Literature DB >> 24299446

Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat.

J Perdigão, M A Muñoz, A Sezinando, I V Luque-Martinez, R Staichak, A Reis, A D Loguercio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of acid etching and application of a hydrophobic resin coat on the enamel/dentin bond strengths and degree of conversion (DC) within the hybrid layer of a universal adhesive system (G-Bond Plus [GB]).
METHODS: A total of 60 extracted third molars were divided into four groups for bond-strength testing, according to the adhesive strategy: GB applied as a one-step self-etch adhesive (1-stepSE); GB applied as in 1-stepSE followed by one coat of the hydrophobic resin Heliobond (2-stepSE); GB applied as a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (2-stepER); GB applied as in 2-stepER followed by one coat of the hydrophobic resin Heliobond (3-stepER). There were 40 teeth used for enamel microshear bond strength (μSBS) and DC; and 20 teeth used for dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and DC. After restorations were constructed, specimens were stored in water (37°C/24 h) and then tested at 0.5 mm/min (μTBS) or 1.0 mm/min (μSBS). Enamel-resin and dentin-resin interfaces from each group were evaluated for DC using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance for each substrate and the Tukey test (α=0.05).
RESULTS: For enamel, the use of a hydrophobic resin coat resulted in statistically significant higher mean enamel μSBS only for the ER strategy (3-stepER vs 2-stepER, p<0.0002). DC was significantly improved for the SE strategy (p<0.00002). For dentin, the use of a hydrophobic resin coat resulted in significantly higher dentin mean μTBS only for the SE strategy (2-stepSE vs 1-stepSE, p<0.0007). DC was significantly improved in groups 2-stepSE and 3-stepER when compared with 1-stepSE and 2-stepER, respectively (p<0.0009).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a hydrophobic resin coat may be beneficial for the selective enamel etching technique, because it improves bond strengths to enamel when applied with the ER strategy and to dentin when used with the SE adhesion strategy. The application of a hydrophobic resin coat may improve DC in resin-dentin interfaces formed with either the SE or the ER strategy. On enamel, DC may benefit from the application of a hydrophobic resin coat over 1-stepSE adhesives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24299446     DOI: 10.2341/13-203-LR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  18 in total

1.  Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão; Laura Ceballos; Isabel Giráldez; Bruno Baracco; Ma Victoria Fuentes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Gabriela D Canali; Sergio A Ignácio; Rodrigo N Rached; Evelise M Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of double-layer application on the early enamel bond strength of universal adhesives.

Authors:  Eizo Hirokane; Toshiki Takamizawa; Yuta Kasahara; Ryo Ishii; Akimasa Tsujimoto; Wayne W Barkmeier; Mark A Latta; Masashi Miyazaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Marginal quality of a full-body bulk-fill composite placed with an universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode: An in vitrostudy.

Authors:  Antonio Signore; Luca Solimei; Marianna-Georgievna Arakelyan; Alina-Vladimirova Arzukanyan; Nicola De Angelis; Andrea Amaroli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-08-01

5.  Effect of an additional bonding resin on the 5-year performance of a universal adhesive: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M Victoria Fuentes; Jorge Perdigão; Bruno Baracco; Isabel Giráldez; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing.

Authors:  Jayang Kim; Sungok Hong; Yoorina Choi; Sujung Park
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-10-02

7.  Recent Advances in Adhesive Bonding - The Role of Biomolecules, Nanocompounds, and Bonding Strategies in Enhancing Resin Bonding to Dental Substrates.

Authors:  Eliseu A Münchow; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Curr Oral Health Rep       Date:  2017-07-10

Review 8.  Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Louis Hardan; Rim Bourgi; Naji Kharouf; Davide Mancino; Maciej Zarow; Natalia Jakubowicz; Youssef Haikel; Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 9.  Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion - not there yet.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-09-23

10.  Influence of two carbodiimides on the bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin.

Authors:  Ana Beatriz Franco Fernandes; Rafael Coutinho Silva; Matheus André Müller; Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha; Gisele Maria Correr; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.