Literature DB >> 24299410

Sexual imprinting: what strategies should we expect to see in nature?

Dalton W Chaffee1, Hayes Griffin, R Tucker Gilman.   

Abstract

Sexual imprinting occurs when juveniles learn mate preferences by observing the phenotypes of other members of their populations, and it is ubiquitous in nature. Imprinting strategies, that is which individuals and phenotypes are observed and how strong preferences become, vary among species. Imprinting can affect trait evolution and the probability of speciation, and different imprinting strategies are expected to have different effects. However, little is known about how and why different imprinting strategies evolve, or which strategies we should expect to see in nature. We used a mathematical model to study how the evolution of sexual imprinting depends on (1) imprinting costs and (2) the sex-specific fitness effects of the phenotype on which individuals imprint. We found that even small fixed costs prevent the evolution of sexual imprinting, but small relative costs do not. When imprinting does evolve, we identified the conditions under which females should evolve to imprint on their fathers, their mothers, or on other members of their populations. Our results provide testable hypotheses for empirical work and help to explain the conditions under which sexual imprinting might evolve to promote speciation.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Evolutionarily stable strategies; learning; model; sexual selection; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24299410     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

Review 1.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Geography, assortative mating, and the effects of sexual selection on speciation with gene flow.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  How phenotypic matching based on neutral mating cues enables speciation in locally adapted populations.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; Mark Pagel; Robert N Curnow; Jonathan Edwards
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Learning to speciate: The biased learning of mate preferences promotes adaptive radiation.

Authors:  R Tucker Gilman; Genevieve M Kozak
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The coevolution of sexual imprinting by males and females.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Gómez-Llano; Eva María Navarro-López; Robert Tucker Gilman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Fathers' eye colour sways daughters' choice of both long- and short-term partners.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Valeria Damian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In humans, only attractive females fulfil their sexually imprinted preferences for eye colour.

Authors:  Paola Bressan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.