Literature DB >> 24299178

Determining obstetric patient safety indicators: the differences in neonatal outcome measures between different-sized delivery units.

A Pyykönen1, M Gissler, M Jakobsson, J Petäjä, A-M Tapper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the differences in neonatal outcome and treatment measures in Finnish obstetric units.
DESIGN: A registry study with Medical Birth Register data. SETTING AND POPULATION: All births (n = 2 94 726) in Finland from 2006 to 2010 with a focus on term, singleton non-university deliveries.
METHODS: All 34 delivery units were grouped into small (below 1000), mid-sized (1000-2999) and large (3000 or more) units, and the adverse outcome rates in neonates were compared using logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early neonatal deaths, stillbirths, Apgar scores, arterial cord pH, Erb's paralysis, respirator treatment, the proportion of post-term deliveries (gestational age beyond 42 weeks) and the proportion of newborns still hospitalised 7 days after delivery.
RESULTS: From an analysis of term, singleton non-university deliveries, the early neonatal mortality was significantly higher in the small relative to the mid-sized delivery units [odds ratio (OR), 2.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-3.60]. The rate of Erb's paralysis was lowest in the large units (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84). The use of a respirator was more than two-fold more common in large relative to mid-sized units (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 2.00-2.83). The proportion of post-term deliveries was highest in the large units (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.31-1.42), where a significantly higher percentage of post-term newborns were still hospitalised after 7 days (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.89).
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in several neonatal indicators dependent on the hospital size. An international consensus is needed on which indicators should be used.
© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neonatology; obstetrics; patient safety indicator

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24299178     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  5 in total

1.  An evaluation by the Norwegian Health Care Supervision Authorities of events involving death or injuries in maternity care.

Authors:  Lars Thomas Johansen; Geir Sverre Braut; Jan Fredrik Andresen; Pål Øian
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 2.  Why Children's Hospitals Are Unique and So Essential.

Authors:  Georges Casimir
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Erik Lenguerrand; Cathy Winter; Dimitrios Siassakos; Graeme MacLennan; Karen Innes; Pauline Lynch; Alan Cameron; Joanna Crofts; Alison McDonald; Kirsty McCormack; Mark Forrest; John Norrie; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Tim Draycott
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  How common is substandard obstetric care in adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage? Findings from an external inspection of Norwegian maternity units.

Authors:  Lars T Johansen; Geir Sverre Braut; Ganesh Acharya; Jan Fredrik Andresen; Pål Øian
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  A step-wise approach to developing indicators to compare the performance of maternity units using hospital administrative data.

Authors:  R S Geary; H E Knight; F E Carroll; I Gurol-Urganci; E Morris; D A Cromwell; J H van der Meulen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.531

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.