Literature DB >> 24299081

Choosing and using climate-change scenarios for ecological-impact assessments and conservation decisions.

Amy K Snover1, Nathan J Mantua, Jeremy S Littell, Michael A Alexander, Michelle M McClure, Janet Nye.   

Abstract

Increased concern over climate change is demonstrated by the many efforts to assess climate effects and develop adaptation strategies. Scientists, resource managers, and decision makers are increasingly expected to use climate information, but they struggle with its uncertainty. With the current proliferation of climate simulations and downscaling methods, scientifically credible strategies for selecting a subset for analysis and decision making are needed. Drawing on a rich literature in climate science and impact assessment and on experience working with natural resource scientists and decision makers, we devised guidelines for choosing climate-change scenarios for ecological impact assessment that recognize irreducible uncertainty in climate projections and address common misconceptions about this uncertainty. This approach involves identifying primary local climate drivers by climate sensitivity of the biological system of interest; determining appropriate sources of information for future changes in those drivers; considering how well processes controlling local climate are spatially resolved; and selecting scenarios based on considering observed emission trends, relative importance of natural climate variability, and risk tolerance and time horizon of the associated decision. The most appropriate scenarios for a particular analysis will not necessarily be the most appropriate for another due to differences in local climate drivers, biophysical linkages to climate, decision characteristics, and how well a model simulates the climate parameters and processes of interest. Given these complexities, we recommend interaction among climate scientists, natural and physical scientists, and decision makers throughout the process of choosing and using climate-change scenarios for ecological impact assessment. Selección y Uso de Escenarios de Cambio Climático para Estudios de Impacto Ecológico y Decisiones de Conservación.
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  agua dulce; cambio climático; climate change; especies amenazadas; estudios de riesgo; freshwater; marine; marino; risk assessment; threatened species

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24299081     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  Integrating subsistence practice and species distribution modeling: assessing invasive elodea's potential impact on Native Alaskan subsistence of Chinook salmon and whitefish.

Authors:  Matthew W Luizza; Paul H Evangelista; Catherine S Jarnevich; Amanda West; Heather Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Coupled Downscaled Climate Models and Ecophysiological Metrics Forecast Habitat Compression for an Endangered Estuarine Fish.

Authors:  Larry R Brown; Lisa M Komoroske; R Wayne Wagner; Tara Morgan-King; Jason T May; Richard E Connon; Nann A Fangue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Projecting species' vulnerability to climate change: Which uncertainty sources matter most and extrapolate best?

Authors:  Valerie Steen; Helen R Sofaer; Susan K Skagen; Andrea J Ray; Barry R Noon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.