Literature DB >> 24298886

Promotional communications for influenza vaccination: a systematic review.

Laura Macdonald1, Georgina Cairns, Kathryn Angus, Marisa de Andrade.   

Abstract

The authors conducted a systematic review that aimed to map current practice and identify effective practice in promotional communications for seasonal influenza vaccination in Europe. They identified 22 studies from 7 European countries. Included studies were primarily outcome evaluations of communications promoting vaccination to health care workers and elderly adults. Evidence on communications to improve public acceptance was sparse. A range of communication approaches, methods, materials, and channels were used, frequently in combination. All forms of promotional communications have the potential to increase uptake in health care workers and can also improve uptake among patients. There was promising evidence that mass communication methods, delivered as standalone activities or as one component of a communication mix, can improve uptake in target populations. Education for health care workers and improved service delivery are common adjuncts to promotional communications that were associated with effectiveness. The evidence suggests that personalized communications, combined with improved service delivery, might boost rates of uptake among elderly adults. Future development of good practice could be enhanced by more systematic, theory-based intervention design and more detailed reporting of process and outcome evaluations. Vaccine hesitancy is increasingly prevalent; more policy and research to improve public acceptance should therefore be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298886     DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.840697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Promoting influenza vaccination: insights from a qualitative meta-analysis of 14 years of influenza-related communications research by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Authors:  Glen J Nowak; Kristine Sheedy; Kelli Bursey; Teresa M Smith; Michelle Basket
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Impact of vaccination programs against measles, varicella and meningococcus C in Italy and in Tuscany and public health policies in the last decades.

Authors:  A Bechini; M Chellini; E Pellegrino; E Tiscione; C Lorini; G Bonaccorsi; P Bonanni; S Boccalini
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 3.  Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Heather Mr Ames; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  Evaluation of Pharmacist-Initiated Interventions on Vaccination Rates in Patients with Asthma or COPD.

Authors:  Haley M Klassing; Janelle F Ruisinger; Emily S Prohaska; Brittany L Melton
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-04

5.  Perception of the Effectiveness of Health-related Campaigns among the Adult Population: An Analysis of Determinants.

Authors:  Mariusz Duplaga
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Vaccination status, acceptance, and knowledge toward a COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional survey in China.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Li; Lin Chen; Qi-Ni Pan; Juan Liu; Xu Zhang; Jing-Jing Yi; Chun-Mei Chen; Qiu-Hu Luo; Pin-Yue Tao; Xiao Pan; Su-Yu Lu; Liang-Zhong Liu; Hui-Qiao Huang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 7.  A rapid evidence appraisal of influenza vaccination in health workers: An important policy in an area of imperfect evidence.

Authors:  Dawn C Jenkin; Hamid Mahgoub; Kathleen F Morales; Philipp Lambach; Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2019-07-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.