Literature DB >> 24298487

What type of lectures students want? - a reaction evaluation of dental students.

Srinivasan Roopa1, Bagavad Geetha M, Anitha Rani, Thomas Chacko.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An one hour didactic lecture is the common method of teaching in dental colleges in India. Lengthy lectures are boring and students are passive recipients of the information. Interactive lectures are suggested as a means of overcoming the disadvantages of regular lectures. AIMS: The present study was conducted to pilot various methods of making lectures interactive and to find the students' reactions to interactive lectures as compared to regular lectures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An entire batch of first year dental students (n = 78) was exposed to both interactive and regular lectures for the cardiovascular system in physiology. Among the total number of 12 lectures, alternate lectures were conducted in an interactive style. At the end of the 12 lecture series, students' opinions were obtained using a structured feedback evaluation questionnaire, consisting of five statements, on a five point Likert scale. Statistical Analysis was done using SPSS software, version 15.
RESULTS: Interactive lectures were found to be more useful than regular lectures by 92% of the students. Significantly more number of students agreed or strongly agreed that interactive lectures kept them attentive, created interest, overcame monotony, motivated them for self learning and provided well defined learning than regular lectures. Among the different techniques which were used, the students preferred use of video clippings (58.1%), followed by each-one-teach-one. RESULTS of the present study support the use of interactive lectures for ensuring increased interest and attention of students during lectures.
CONCLUSION: Interactive lectures were more accepted and considered to be more useful than regular lectures by the students.

Keywords:  Active learning; Interactive lectures; Large group teaching; Reaction evaluation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298487      PMCID: PMC3843470          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5985.3482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  7 in total

1.  The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive lecturing.

Authors:  L Nasmith; Y Steinert
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  A schematic approach to diagnosing and resolving lecturalgia.

Authors:  K McLaughlin; H Mandin
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers.

Authors:  George Brown; Michael Manogue
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Sliding away from PowerPoint: the interactive lecture.

Authors:  Kara K Moellenberg; Michael Aldridge
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.082

5.  Interactive lecturing for meaningful learning in large groups.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Gülpinar; Berrak C Yeğen
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

7.  Techniques for rapid quantitative assessment of activity levels in small-group tutorials.

Authors:  J F Prinz; H Y Yip; G L Tipoe; P W Lucas; M Lenstrup
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.251

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Quality of Root Canals Performed by the Inaugural Class of Dental Students at Libyan International Medical University.

Authors:  Ranya F Elemam; Ziad Salim Abdul Majid; Matt Groesbeck; Álvaro F Azevedo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-06-08

2.  The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jasmina Sterz; Sebastian H Höfer; Bernd Bender; Maren Janko; Farzin Adili; Miriam Ruesseler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions.

Authors:  Cristan Herbert; Gary M Velan; Wendy M Pryor; Rakesh K Kumar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Multi-Residency Implementation of an Online Movement Disorders Curriculum Based on Real Patient Videos.

Authors:  Sara M Schaefer; Zachary London; Joseph M Ferrara; Matthew A McCoyd; Carolyn Cronin; Emily Poole Pharr; Raymond Price; Heather B Rigby; Scott Vota; Molly Cincotta; Martin D Slade; Jeremy J Moeller
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2021-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.