Literature DB >> 24297551

Imputation-based assessment of next generation rare exome variant arrays.

Alicia R Martin1, Gerard Tse, Carlos D Bustamante, Eimear E Kenny.   

Abstract

A striking finding from recent large-scale sequencing efforts is that the vast majority of variants in the human genome are rare and found within single populations or lineages. These observations hold important implications for the design of the next round of disease variant discovery efforts-if genetic variants that influence disease risk follow the same trend, then we expect to see population-specific disease associations that require large sample sizes for detection. To address this challenge, and due to the still prohibitive cost of sequencing large cohorts, researchers have developed a new generation of low-cost genotyping arrays that assay rare variation previously identified from large exome sequencing studies. Genotyping approaches rely not only on directly observing variants, but also on phasing and imputation methods that use publicly available reference panels to infer unobserved variants in a study cohort. Rare variant exome arrays are intentionally enriched for variants likely to be disease causing, and here we assay the ability of the first commercially available rare exome variant array (the Illumina Infinium HumanExome BeadChip) to also tag other potentially damaging variants not molecularly assayed. Using full sequence data from chromosome 22 from the phase I 1000 Genomes Project, we evaluate three methods for imputation (BEAGLE, MaCH-Admix, and SHAPEIT2/IMPUTE2) with the rare exome variant array under varied study panel sizes, reference panel sizes, and LD structures via population differences. We find that imputation is more accurate across both the genome and exome for common variant arrays than the next generation array for all allele frequencies, including rare alleles. We also find that imputation is the least accurate in African populations, and accuracy is substantially improved for rare variants when the same population is included in the reference panel. Depending on the goals of GWAS researchers, our results will aid budget decisions by helping determine whether money is best spent sequencing the genomes of smaller sample sizes, genotyping larger sample sizes with rare and/or common variant arrays and imputing SNPs, or some combination of the two.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24297551      PMCID: PMC3900244     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  24 in total

1.  A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes.

Authors:  Olivier Delaneau; Jonathan Marchini; Jean-François Zagury
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Uncovering the roles of rare variants in common disease through whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Cirulli; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Bryan Howie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits.

Authors:  Lucia A Hindorff; Praveen Sethupathy; Heather A Junkins; Erin M Ramos; Jayashri P Mehta; Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Phasing of many thousands of genotyped samples.

Authors:  Amy L Williams; Nick Patterson; Joseph Glessner; Hakon Hakonarson; David Reich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Hunter-gatherer genomic diversity suggests a southern African origin for modern humans.

Authors:  Brenna M Henn; Christopher R Gignoux; Matthew Jobin; Julie M Granka; J M Macpherson; Jeffrey M Kidd; Laura Rodríguez-Botigué; Sohini Ramachandran; Lawrence Hon; Abra Brisbin; Alice A Lin; Peter A Underhill; David Comas; Kenneth K Kidd; Paul J Norman; Peter Parham; Carlos D Bustamante; Joanna L Mountain; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes.

Authors:  Bryan Howie; Jonathan Marchini; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Imputation-based genomic coverage assessments of current human genotyping arrays.

Authors:  Sarah C Nelson; Kimberly F Doheny; Elizabeth W Pugh; Jane M Romm; Hua Ling; Cecelia A Laurie; Sharon R Browning; Bruce S Weir; Cathy C Laurie
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  6 in total

1.  Association analysis of exome variants and refraction, axial length, and corneal curvature in a European-American population.

Authors:  Candelaria Vergara; Samantha M Bomotti; Cristian Valencia; Barbara E K Klein; Kristine E Lee; Ronald Klein; Alison P Klein; Priya Duggal
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Exome genotyping arrays to identify rare and low frequency variants associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer B Permuth; Ailith Pirie; Y Ann Chen; Hui-Yi Lin; Brett M Reid; Zhihua Chen; Alvaro Monteiro; Joe Dennis; Gustavo Mendoza-Fandino; Hoda Anton-Culver; Elisa V Bandera; Maria Bisogna; Louise Brinton; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Michael E Carney; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Linda S Cook; Daniel W Cramer; Julie M Cunningham; Cezary Cybulski; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Jennifer Anne Doherty; Madalene Earp; Robert P Edwards; Brooke L Fridley; Simon A Gayther; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Marc T Goodman; Jacek Gronwald; Estrid Hogdall; Edwin S Iversen; Anna Jakubowska; Allan Jensen; Beth Y Karlan; Linda E Kelemen; Suzanne K Kjaer; Peter Kraft; Nhu D Le; Douglas A Levine; Jolanta Lissowska; Jan Lubinski; Keitaro Matsuo; Usha Menon; Rosemary Modugno; Kirsten B Moysich; Toru Nakanishi; Roberta B Ness; Sara Olson; Irene Orlow; Celeste L Pearce; Tanja Pejovic; Elizabeth M Poole; Susan J Ramus; Mary Anne Rossing; Dale P Sandler; Xiao-Ou Shu; Honglin Song; Jack A Taylor; Soo-Hwang Teo; Kathryn L Terry; Pamela J Thompson; Shelley S Tworoger; Penelope M Webb; Nicolas Wentzensen; Lynne R Wilkens; Stacey Winham; Yin-Ling Woo; Anna H Wu; Hannah Yang; Wei Zheng; Argyrios Ziogas; Catherine M Phelan; Joellen M Schildkraut; Andrew Berchuck; Ellen L Goode; Paul D P Pharoah; Thomas A Sellers
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  A new strategy for enhancing imputation quality of rare variants from next-generation sequencing data via combining SNP and exome chip data.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Juyoung Lee; Bong-Jo Kim; Taesung Park
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  CDKN2A Copy Number Loss Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  William S Chen; Ranjit S Bindra; Allen Mo; Thomas Hayman; Zain Husain; Joseph N Contessa; Stephen G Gaffney; Jeffrey P Townsend; James B Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Imputation-Aware Tag SNP Selection To Improve Power for Large-Scale, Multi-ethnic Association Studies.

Authors:  Genevieve L Wojcik; Christian Fuchsberger; Daniel Taliun; Ryan Welch; Alicia R Martin; Suyash Shringarpure; Christopher S Carlson; Goncalo Abecasis; Hyun Min Kang; Michael Boehnke; Carlos D Bustamante; Christopher R Gignoux; Eimear E Kenny
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population.

Authors:  Ricardo V Ventura; Stephen P Miller; Ken G Dodds; Benoit Auvray; Michael Lee; Matthew Bixley; Shannon M Clarke; John C McEwan
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.