Literature DB >> 24297533

Detecting statistical interaction between somatic mutational events and germline variation from next-generation sequence data.

Hao Hu1, Chad D Huff.   

Abstract

The two-hit model of carcinogenesis provides a valuable framework for understanding the role of DNA repair and tumor suppressor genes in cancer development and progression. Under this model, tumor development can initiate from a single somatic mutation in individuals that inherit an inactivating germline variant. Although the two-hit model can be an overgeneralization, the tendency for the pattern of somatic mutations to differ in cancer patients that inherit predisposition alleles is a signal that can be used to identify and validate germline susceptibility variants. Here, we present the Somatic-Germline Interaction (SGI) tool, which is designed to identify statistical interaction between germline variants and somatic mutational events from next-generation sequence data. SGI interfaces with rare-variant association tests and variant classifiers to identify candidate germline susceptibility variants from case-control sequencing data. SGI then analyzes tumor-normal pair next-generation sequence data to evaluate evidence for somatic-germline interaction in each gene or pathway using two tests: the Allelic Imbalance Rank Sum (AIRS) test and the Somatic Mutation Interaction Test (SMIT). AIRS tests for preferential allelic imbalance to evaluate whether somatic mutational events tend to amplify candidate germline variants. SMIT evaluates whether somatic point mutations and small indels occur more or less frequently than expected in the presence of candidate germline variants. Both AIRS and SMIT control for heterogeneity in the mutational process resulting from regional variation in mutation rates and inter-sample variation in background mutation rates. The SGI test combines AIRS and SMIT to provide a single, unified measure of statistical interaction between somatic mutational events and germline variation. We show that the tests implemented in SGI have high power with relatively modest sample sizes in a wide variety of scenarios. We demonstrate the utility of SGI to increase the power of rare variant association studies in cancer and to validate the potential role in cancer causation of germline susceptibility variants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24297533      PMCID: PMC3926123     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  35 in total

1.  APC and colon cancer: two hits for one.

Authors:  Craig J Ceol; David Pellman; Leonard I Zon
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  A common JAK2 haplotype confers susceptibility to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Damla Olcaydu; Ashot Harutyunyan; Roland Jäger; Tiina Berg; Bettina Gisslinger; Ingrid Pabinger; Heinz Gisslinger; Robert Kralovics
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral.

Authors:  S V Tavtigian; A M Deffenbaugh; L Yin; T Judkins; T Scholl; P B Samollow; D de Silva; A Zharkikh; A Thomas
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC.

Authors:  S J Laken; G M Petersen; S B Gruber; C Oddoux; H Ostrer; F M Giardiello; S R Hamilton; H Hampel; A Markowitz; D Klimstra; S Jhanwar; S Winawer; K Offit; M C Luce; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Truncating APC mutations have dominant effects on proliferation, spindle checkpoint control, survival and chromosome stability.

Authors:  Anthony Tighe; Victoria L Johnson; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  A germline JAK2 SNP is associated with predisposition to the development of JAK2(V617F)-positive myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Outi Kilpivaara; Semanti Mukherjee; Alison M Schram; Martha Wadleigh; Ann Mullally; Benjamin L Ebert; Adam Bass; Sachie Marubayashi; Adriana Heguy; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Kenneth Offit; Richard M Stone; D Gary Gilliland; Robert J Klein; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Rare, evolutionarily unlikely missense substitutions in ATM confer increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sean V Tavtigian; Peter J Oefner; Davit Babikyan; Anne Hartmann; Sue Healey; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Fabienne Lesueur; Graham B Byrnes; Shu-Chun Chuang; Nathalie Forey; Corinna Feuchtinger; Lydie Gioia; Janet Hall; Mia Hashibe; Barbara Herte; Sandrine McKay-Chopin; Alun Thomas; Maxime P Vallée; Catherine Voegele; Penelope M Webb; David C Whiteman; Suleeporn Sangrajrang; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Irene L Andrulis; Esther M John; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Rare, evolutionarily unlikely missense substitutions in CHEK2 contribute to breast cancer susceptibility: results from a breast cancer family registry case-control mutation-screening study.

Authors:  Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Fabienne Lesueur; Francesca Damiola; Maxime Vallée; Catherine Voegele; Davit Babikyan; Geoffroy Durand; Nathalie Forey; Sandrine McKay-Chopin; Nivonirina Robinot; Tù Nguyen-Dumont; Alun Thomas; Graham B Byrnes; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Irene L Andrulis; Esther M John; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Oncogene mutations, copy number gains and mutant allele specific imbalance (MASI) frequently occur together in tumor cells.

Authors:  Junichi Soh; Naoki Okumura; William W Lockwood; Hiromasa Yamamoto; Hisayuki Shigematsu; Wei Zhang; Raj Chari; David S Shames; Ximing Tang; Calum MacAulay; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Tõnu Vooder; Ignacio I Wistuba; Stephen Lam; Rolf Brekken; Shinichi Toyooka; John D Minna; Wan L Lam; Adi F Gazdar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Alternative Applications of Genotyping Array Data Using Multivariant Methods.

Authors:  David C Samuels; Jennifer E Below; Scott Ness; Hui Yu; Shuguang Leng; Yan Guo
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Codon-level co-occurrences of germline variants and somatic mutations in cancer are rare but often lead to incorrect variant annotation and underestimated impact prediction.

Authors:  Amanda Koire; Young Won Kim; Jarey Wang; Panagiotis Katsonis; Haijing Jin; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.