Literature DB >> 24297438

Modeling motivated misreports to sensitive survey questions.

Ulf Böckenholt1.   

Abstract

Asking sensitive or personal questions in surveys or experimental studies can both lower response rates and increase item non-response and misreports. Although non-response is easily diagnosed, misreports are not. However, misreports cannot be ignored because they give rise to systematic bias. The purpose of this paper is to present a modeling approach that identifies misreports and corrects for them. Misreports are conceptualized as a motivated process under which respondents edit their answers before they report them. For example, systematic bias introduced by overreports of socially desirable behaviors or underreports of less socially desirable ones can be modeled, leading to more-valid inferences. The proposed approach is applied to a large-scale experimental study and shows that respondents who feel powerful tend to overclaim their knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297438     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9390-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

Review 1.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH.

Authors:  L G RORER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition.

Authors:  J T Cacioppo; R E Petty; C F Kao
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1984-06

3.  From power to action.

Authors:  Adam D Galinsky; Deborah H Gruenfeld; Joe C Magee
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-09

Review 4.  Sensitive questions in surveys.

Authors:  Roger Tourangeau; Ting Yan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The interpersonal expression of perfection: perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress.

Authors:  Paul L Hewitt; Gordon L Flett; Simon B Sherry; Marie Habke; Melanie Parkin; Raymond W Lam; Bruce McMurtry; Evelyn Ediger; Paul Fairlie; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-06

6.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Briñol; Richard E Petty; Carmen Valle; Derek D Rucker; Alberto Becerra
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-12

7.  A Test for Anchoring and Yea-Saying in Experimental Consumption Data.

Authors:  Arthur van Soest; Michael Hurd
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Separating fact from fiction: an examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles.

Authors:  Catalina L Toma; Jeffrey T Hancock; Nicole B Ellison
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-08

9.  Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding.

Authors:  Thomas Holtgraves
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-02
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.

Authors:  Susanne Frick
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.