Literature DB >> 24297110

The diagnostic utility of rib series in assessing rib fractures.

Waqas Shuaib1, Arvind Vijayasarathi, Muhammad Hamza Tiwana, Jamlik-Omari Johnson, Kiran Kumar Maddu, Faisal Khosa.   

Abstract

Rib series rarely add information to the posteroanterior (PA) film for the diagnosis of rib fractures. In this investigation, we evaluated the utility of rib X-rays using turnaround time (TAT), radiation exposure, and cost-efficiency as the key parameters. This investigation was conducted from January 2008 to December 2012. We included patients who had rib series performed for suspected rib fractures. TAT for patients was calculated from the time exam was ordered by the emergency department (ED) physician/staff to time the report was finalized by the attending radiologist. Effective radiation dose for rib series was calculated as a summation of radiation dose from the standard rib series images for each patient. Cost-efficiency was determined based on the number of interventions that took place as a result of a complicated study. Our investigation consisted of 422 patients, 208 females aged (57 ± 20.8) and 214 males aged (48 ± 17.3). A total of 74(17.5 %) abnormal findings were noted, out of which only 1(0.23 %) underwent management change. The mean turnaround time for patients undergoing rib series had a value of 133.5 (±129.8) min as opposed to a single chest PA of 61.8(± 64) min. Average effective radiation dose for a rib series was 0.105 (±0.04) mSv, whereas average effective radiation dose of a single chest PA was 0.02 mSv. Dedicated rib series has a low-yield diagnostic value as it pertains to management change. The overall impact on patient care based on our findings is small when compared to the risks associated with prolonged TAT, repeated exposure to radiation, and extensive medical costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297110     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-013-1177-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  12 in total

1.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Sensitive biomarkers of cancer recurrence and metastasis: inexpensive tools to cut costs and reduce radiation exposure among cancer patients.

Authors:  Timothy V Johnson; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Sonography compared with radiography in revealing acute rib fracture.

Authors:  J F Griffith; T H Rainer; A S Ching; K L Law; R A Cocks; C Metreweli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Trauma of the bony thorax.

Authors:  K R Kattan
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 0.800

5.  Radiation exposure among patients with the highest CT scan utilization in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kaushal H Shah; Benjamin H Slovis; Dan Runde; Brandon Godbout; David H Newman; Jarone Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-07-14

6.  Patient ED turnaround times: a comparative review.

Authors:  A C Southall; V V Harris
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Clinical rib fractures: are follow-up chest X-rays a waste of resources?

Authors:  Brian J Bansidhar; Jorge A Lagares-Garcia; S L Miller
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy.

Authors:  Jennifer Prah Ruger; Christopher J Richter; Edward L Spitznagel; Lawrence M Lewis
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Epidemiology of sternal fractures.

Authors:  Gustavo Recinos; Kenji Inaba; Joseph Dubose; Galinos Barmparas; Pedro G R Teixeira; Peep Talving; David Plurad; Donald Green; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children.

Authors:  Ruth A Kleinerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors affecting patient compliance in the acute setting: an analysis of 20,000 imaging reports.

Authors:  Waqas Shuaib; Arvind Vijayasarathi; Jamlik-Omari Johnson; Ninad Salastekar; Qing He; Kiran Kumar Maddu; Faisal Khosa
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-11

2.  Clinical information available during emergency department imaging order entry and radiologist interpretation.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Saurabh Rohatgi; Haris N Shekhani; Ishaan Amit Dave; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-02-27

3.  Minimal-trauma fracture in women with breast cancer surviving for at least 5 years from diagnosis.

Authors:  P J Robinson; R J Bell; C S Zecena Morales; P Fradkin; S R Davis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Utility of CT head in the acute setting: value of contrast and non-contrast studies.

Authors:  W Shuaib; M H Tiwana; F H Chokshi; J O Johnson; H Bedi; F Khosa
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Faster magnetic resonance imaging in emergency room patients with right lower quadrant pain and suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Memoona Mian; Faisal Khosa; Ismail T Ali; Patrick McLaughlin; Darren Klass; Silvia Chang; Savvas Nicolaou
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.