Literature DB >> 24297102

A comparison of SF-36 summary measures of physical and mental health for women across the life course.

Gita D Mishra1, Richard Hockey, Annette J Dobson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS, respectively) are often used to summarise SF-36 quality of life subscales. This paper investigates PCS and MCS across the life course and compares the trajectories obtained from two different methods of calculation.
METHODS: The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health is a population-based study with three cohorts of women and SF-36 surveys taken at multiple time points. Scoring coefficients for each component score were determined using factor analysis with uncorrelated (orthogonal) and correlated (oblique) rotation at the baseline survey, which were then used to compute correlated and uncorrelated PCS and MCS scores at each survey (scaled to have mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 at baseline).
RESULTS: For both methods, PCS declined progressively across the lifespan, while MCS rose in young and mid-age women to a peak and subsequently declined in later life. Differences were apparent between correlated and uncorrelated scores, most notably for MCS in the older cohort, where correlated MCS reached 54.6 but still less than uncorrelated MCS, with a random effects model indicating 1.63 (95% confidence intervals 1.58-1.67) units difference; it then declined to a score of 51.2 by the last survey and the difference widened to 3.44 (3.38-3.50) units compared with the uncorrelated MCS.
CONCLUSIONS: PCS and MCS have distinct trajectories through life, with differences in results from correlated and uncorrelated component summary scores. The divergence is most notable with MCS, especially for older women, suggesting that correlated MCS and PCS should be used when examining change in health over time in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297102     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0586-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

1.  The SF-36 summary scales: problems and solutions.

Authors:  D Wilson; J Parsons; G Tucker
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2000

2.  Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores?

Authors:  C Taft; J Karlsson; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Norms for the physical and mental health component summary scores of the SF-36 for young, middle-aged and older Australian women.

Authors:  G Mishra; M J Schofield
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  No health without mental health: A role for the Cochrane Collaboration.

Authors:  Rachel Churchill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

6.  SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct?

Authors:  G E Simon; D A Revicki; L Grothaus; M Vonkorff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Anastasia Karvouni; Ioanna Kouri; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-12

8.  Patients with worse mental health report more physical limitations after adjustment for physical performance.

Authors:  Bernice Ruo; David W Baker; Jason A Thompson; Patrick K Murray; Gail M Huber; Joseph J Sudano
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores.

Authors:  Mark Hann; David Reeves
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  From midlife to early old age: health trajectories associated with retirement.

Authors:  Markus Jokela; Jane E Ferrie; David Gimeno; Tarani Chandola; Martin J Shipley; Jenny Head; Jussi Vahtera; Hugo Westerlund; Michael G Marmot; Mika Kivimäki
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  15 in total

1.  Relationship between the total length of the stents and patients' quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xuming Yang; Pingshuan Dong; Zhijuan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Hierarchical measurement structure in the Women's Health Questionnaire: a confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  B J Shen; Q Fan; J S Huang; M H R Ho; W J Mack; H N Hodis
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Midlife Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Women.

Authors:  Nancy E Avis; Alicia Colvin; Joyce T Bromberger; Rachel Hess
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Aging Well: Observations From the Women's Health Initiative Study.

Authors:  Nancy Fugate Woods; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Barbara B Cochrane; Andrea Z La Croix; Teresa E Seeman; Hilary A Tindle; Oleg Zaslavsky; Chloe E Bird; Karen C Johnson; JoAnn E Manson; Judith K Ockene; Rebecca A Seguin; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  The impact of comorbidity on the relationship between life stress and health-related quality of life for Chinese- and Korean-American breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jung-Won Lim
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Get Healthy after Breast Cancer - examining the feasibility, acceptability and outcomes of referring breast cancer survivors to a general population telephone-delivered program targeting physical activity, healthy diet and weight loss.

Authors:  S Lawler; G Maher; M Brennan; A Goode; M M Reeves; E Eakin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Changes in plant-based diet quality and health-related quality of life in women.

Authors:  Megu Y Baden; Shiho Kino; Xiaoran Liu; Yanping Li; Yongjoo Kim; Laura D Kubzansky; An Pan; Olivia I Okereke; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Childhood and maternal effects on physical health related quality of life five decades later: the British 1946 birth cohort.

Authors:  Gita D Mishra; Stephanie Black; Mai Stafford; Rachel Cooper; Diana Kuh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Population Aging at Cross-Roads: Diverging Secular Trends in Average Cognitive Functioning and Physical Health in the Older Population of Germany.

Authors:  Nadia Steiber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association of age with health-related quality of life in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the Georgians Organized Against Lupus study.

Authors:  Laura Plantinga; S Sam Lim; C Barrett Bowling; Cristina Drenkard
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.