L Padua1, P Caliandro2, G Di Iasi3, C Pazzaglia4, F Ciaraffa2, A Evoli2. 1. Institute of Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: lpadua@rm.unicatt.it. 2. Institute of Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. 3. 1st Division of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, Seconda Università, Napoli, Italy. 4. Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the utility of single-fibre electromyography (SFEMG) in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) in subjects with a clinical suspicion of the disease. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-blinded study on 100 consecutive patients. SFEMG was not considered a criterion in making the MG diagnosis. For all cases, a different physician than the one performing SFEMG made the diagnosis of MG. All subjects underwent standard SFEMG of a single muscle, the orbicularis oculi. RESULTS: SFEMG was abnormal in 67 of 100 patients. A final diagnosis of definite MG was made in 54 patients (30 men/24 women). SFEMG was positive in 53 of 54 patients diagnosed with MG. The sensitivity of SFEMG in diagnosing MG was 98% (95% CI: 0.94-1.02), while the specificity was 70% (95% CI: 0.54-0.86), with a positive predictive value of 79% (95% CI: 0.74-0.79) and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients, normal SFEMG findings were unlikely to occur in patients with MG. SIGNIFICANCE: SFEMG is not a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of MG, but it has a high negative predictive value in identifying patients without MG.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the utility of single-fibre electromyography (SFEMG) in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) in subjects with a clinical suspicion of the disease. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-blinded study on 100 consecutive patients. SFEMG was not considered a criterion in making the MG diagnosis. For all cases, a different physician than the one performing SFEMG made the diagnosis of MG. All subjects underwent standard SFEMG of a single muscle, the orbicularis oculi. RESULTS: SFEMG was abnormal in 67 of 100 patients. A final diagnosis of definite MG was made in 54 patients (30 men/24 women). SFEMG was positive in 53 of 54 patients diagnosed with MG. The sensitivity of SFEMG in diagnosing MG was 98% (95% CI: 0.94-1.02), while the specificity was 70% (95% CI: 0.54-0.86), with a positive predictive value of 79% (95% CI: 0.74-0.79) and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients, normal SFEMG findings were unlikely to occur in patients with MG. SIGNIFICANCE: SFEMG is not a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of MG, but it has a high negative predictive value in identifying patients without MG.
Authors: Lei Shi; Heng-Fang Liu; Min Zhang; Ya-Pei Guo; Bo Song; Chang-Dong Song; Dan-Dan Song; Yu-Ming Xu Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2015-10-15