Literature DB >> 24295547

Usefulness of the troponin-ejection fraction product to differentiate stress cardiomyopathy from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Francisco O Nascimento1, Solomon Yang2, Maiteder Larrauri-Reyes2, Andres M Pineda2, Vertilio Cornielle2, Orlando Santana2, Todd B Heimowitz2, Gregg W Stone3, Nirat Beohar2.   

Abstract

The presentation of stress cardiomyopathy (SC) with nonobstructive coronary artery disease mimics that of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to coronary occlusion. No single parameter has been successful in differentiating the 2 entities. We thus sought to develop a noninvasive clinical tool to discriminate between these 2 conditions. We retrospectively reviewed 59 consecutive cases of SC at our institution from July 2005 through June 2011 and compared those with 60 consecutives cases of angiographically confirmed STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the same period. All patients underwent acute echocardiography, and the peak troponin I level was determined. The troponin-ejection fraction product (TEFP) was derived by multiplying the peak troponin I level and the echocardiographically derived left ventricular ejection fraction. Comparing the SC and STEMI groups, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction at the time of presentation was 30 ± 9% versus 44 ± 11%, respectively (p <0.001), and the peak troponin I was 7.6 ± 18 versus 102.2 ± 110.3 ng/dl, respectively (p <0.001). The mean TEFP was thus 182 ± 380 and 4,088 ± 4,244 for the SC and STEMI groups, respectively (p <0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a TEFP value ≥250 had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 87%, a negative predictive value of 94%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and an overall accuracy of 91% to differentiate a true STEMI from SC (C-statistic 0.91 ± 0.02, p <0.001). In conclusion, for patients not undergoing emergent angiography, the TEFP may be used with high accuracy to differentiate SC with nonobstructive coronary artery disease from true STEMI due to coronary occlusion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24295547     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Does this patient have takotsubo syndrome?

Authors:  Anthony S McLean; Michel Slama; Michelle Chew
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A Case Report of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Acute Pancreatitis Induced Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy (TCM) in a Patient With Gallstones Induced Acute Pancreatitis and Cholangitis.

Authors:  Zahid Khan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 3.  Perioperative takotsubo cardiomyopathy: Implications for anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Shvetank Agarwal; Chinar Sanghvi; Nadine Odo; Manuel R Castresana
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Imaging in Stress Cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo Syndrome).

Authors:  Fawzi Zghyer; W Savindu Pasan Botheju; Joshua E Kiss; Erin D Michos; Mary C Corretti; Monica Mukherjee; Allison G Hays
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 5.  A systematic review of biomarkers in Takotsubo syndrome: A focus on better understanding the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Hilal Khan; David Gamble; Alice Mezincescu; Hassan Abbas; Amelia Rudd; Dana Dawson
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-05-19

6.  Reversible stress cardiomyopathy presenting as acute coronary syndrome with elevated troponin in the absence of regional wall motion abnormalities: a forme fruste of stress cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Mahesh Anantha Narayanan; Vimalkumar Veerappan Kandasamy; Satish Chandraprakasam; Aryan Mooss
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.