Literature DB >> 24294915

Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.

Carina Giesen1, Klaus Rothermund1.   

Abstract

Even an irrelevant distractor stimulus is integrated into event files. Subsequently repeating the distractor triggers retrieval of the event file; however, an unresolved issue concerns the question of what is retrieved by the distractor. While recent studies predominantly assume that the distractor retrieves the previous response, it is also possible that distractor repetition triggers retrieval of the previous target stimulus. In 3 experiments, we dissociated distractor-response and distractor-target binding processes using a sequential distractor-to-distractor repetition paradigm. In Experiment 1, response relation and target relation were manipulated orthogonally; results yielded independent evidence for both mechanisms. Experiment 2 provided distinct evidence for distractor-target binding and retrieval by avoiding response repetitions of any kind. Experiment 3 provided distinct evidence for distractor-response binding and retrieval by eliminating target stimuli. We conclude that both distractor-target and distractor-response binding reflect independent processes in the service of behavior automatization. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24294915     DOI: 10.1037/a0035278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Partial repetition costs index a mixture of binding and signaling.

Authors:  Daniel H Weissman; Lauren D Grant; Iring Koch; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Long-term response-stimulus associations can influence distractor-response bindings.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-06-26

6.  Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.

Authors:  Aidan J Horner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.

Authors:  Carina G Giesen; James R Schmidt; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15

8.  Goal-Based Binding of Irrelevant Stimulus Features for Action Slips.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Klaus Rothermund; Juhi Jayesh Parmar; Birte Moeller; Christian Frings; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2021-07

9.  Study-test congruence of response levels in item stimulus-response priming.

Authors:  Carlos A Gomes; Andrew Mayes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-07

10.  The official soundtrack to "Five shades of grey": Generalization in multimodal distractor-based retrieval.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Tarini Singh; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.