Literature DB >> 24294575

Modified technique of anterior nasal packing: a comparative study report.

Sirshak Dutta1, Ankur Mukherjee, Jayanta Saha, Goutam Biswas, Dibakar Haldar, Indranil Sen, Ramanuj Sinha.   

Abstract

Anterior nasal packing, which is a common procedure in otorhinolaryngology practice, has different complications. Pain during introduction and removal of pack, bleeding after removal due to mucosal damage and synechia formation are common among them. A continuous effort is going on worldwide to combat those by modifying the nature of pack material or inventing new materials for nasal packing. In the present study an effort was made to compare a new modification of conventional gauze pack by using aluminum foil prepared from the cover of suture materials as septal splint (to reduce the mucosal damage) with conventional gauze pack and another costly material, nasal tampon (merocel). Comparisons were done in terms of cost, efficacy and complications. Prospective hospital based interventional study. Patients were distributed into three groups according to the material used for anterior nasal packing. Comparisons were made in terms of cost of the material used, pain during introduction of pack, rise of systolic blood pressure, incidences of bleeding while pack in situ, incidences of bleeding after removal of pack that required repacking and incidences of synechia formation after pack removal. The episodes of bleeding while pack in situ, within first 48 h and forced for repacking was observed to be significantly more prevalent among nasal tampon groups (12.5%) of patients but only 2.1 and 2.4% with use of conventional gauze pack and our modification respectively. Regarding bleeding after removal of pack, 10.6% patients experienced bleeding with conventional gauze pack, whereas with our modification it was only 2.4%. Synechia formation was found to be highest among the cases with conventional gauze pack (14.9%), but with our modification it is only 2.4%. In this study it is found that use of aluminum foil prepared from the cover of suture materials can be very useful and cost effective method to reduce some of the complications of anterior nasal packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANS packing; Epistaxis; Nasal tampon; Septal splint

Year:  2011        PMID: 24294575      PMCID: PMC3477445          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0343-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  10 in total

1.  An absorbent, non-adherent nasal pack.

Authors:  F M Kamer; M L Parkes
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Nasal tampon packing using anesthetic lidocaine and chlorhexidine urinary lubricant gel.

Authors:  Ufuk Aydin; Medine Rehimli; Ramazan Kahveci
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  A case against nasal packing.

Authors:  F J Stucker; D G Ansel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Relation of high blood pressure to headache, epistaxis, and selected other symptoms. The United States Health Examination Survey of Adults.

Authors:  N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery.

Authors:  R J Garth; A P Brightwell
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Routine nasal packing follwoing nasal surgery-Is it necessary?

Authors:  S I Basha; D Gupta; S K Kaluskar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-01

7.  Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery--is it justified?

Authors:  M von Schoenberg; P Robinson; R Ryan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Comparison of suture and nasal packing in rabbit noses.

Authors:  Erkhan Genç; N Tan Ergin; Banu Bilezikçi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  A randomized study to compare calcium sodium alginate fibre with two commonly used materials for packing after nasal surgery.

Authors:  K S Sirimanna; G B Todd; G J Madden
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1992-06

10.  The absorbable nasal pack.

Authors:  N Fanous
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1980-12
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A prospective randomized trial of xylometazoline drops and epinephrine merocele nasal pack for reducing epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sonam Patel; Amarjyoti Hazarika; Prachi Agrawal; Divya Jain; Naresh Kumar Panda
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-08-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.