Literature DB >> 24294112

The use of ammonium formate as a mobile-phase modifier for LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digests.

Darryl Johnson1, Barry Boyes, Ron Orlando.   

Abstract

A major challenge facing current mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics research is the large concentration range displayed in biological systems, which far exceeds the dynamic range of commonly available mass spectrometers. One approach to overcome this limitation is to improve online reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) separation methodologies. LC mobile-phase modifiers are used to improve peak shape and increase sample load tolerance. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a commonly used mobile-phase modifier, as it produces peptide separations that are far superior to other additives. However, TFA leads to signal suppression when incorporated with electrospray ionization (ESI), and thus, other modifiers, such as formic acid (FA), are used for LC-MS applications. FA exhibits significantly less signal suppression, but is not as effective of a modifier as TFA. An alternative mobile-phase modifier is the combination of FA and ammonium formate (AF), which has been shown to improve peptide separations. The ESI-MS compatibility of this modifier has not been investigated, particularly for proteomic applications. This work compares the separation metrics of mobile phases modified with FA and FA/AF and explores the use of FA/AF for the LC-MS analysis of tryptic digests. Standard tryptic-digest peptides were used for comparative analysis of peak capacity and sample load tolerance. The compatibility of FA/AF in proteomic applications was examined with the analysis of soluble proteins from canine prostate carcinoma tissue. Overall, the use of FA/AF improved online RP-LC separations and led to significant increases in peptide identifications with improved protein sequence coverage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; proteomics; tandem mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24294112      PMCID: PMC3825588          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.13-2404-005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  25 in total

Review 1.  Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Righetti; Annalisa Castagna; Ben Herbert; Frederic Reymond; Joël S Rossier
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Methods for fractionation, separation and profiling of proteins and peptides.

Authors:  Haleem J Issaq; Thomas P Conrads; George M Janini; Timothy D Veenstra
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Wider pore superficially porous particles for peptide separations by HPLC.

Authors:  S A Schuster; B M Wagner; B E Boyes; J J Kirkland
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.618

Review 4.  Fast analysis in liquid chromatography using small particle size and high pressure.

Authors:  Dao T T Nguyen; Davy Guillarme; Serge Rudaz; Jean-Luc Veuthey
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations.

Authors:  David V McCalley
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Some practical comparisons of the efficiency and overloading behaviour of sub-2 μm porous and sub-3 μm shell particles in reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

Authors:  David V McCalley
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Evaluation of volatile eluents and electrolytes for high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of proteins. II. Capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  C G Huber; A Premstaller; G Kleindienst
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Studies of signal suppression in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using volatile ion-pairing reagents.

Authors:  S A Gustavsson; J Samskog; K E Markides; B Långström
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  Comparison of peak shapes obtained with volatile (mass spectrometry-compatible) buffers and conventional buffers in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of bases on particulate and monolithic columns.

Authors:  David V McCalley
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Enhanced sensitivity for peptide mapping with electrospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in the presence of signal suppression due to trifluoroacetic acid-containing mobile phases.

Authors:  A Apffel; S Fischer; G Goldberg; P C Goodley; F E Kuhlmann
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 4.759

View more
  4 in total

1.  A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of hederasaponin B in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Jiaxin Liu; Xueyan Yang; Lin Li; Qili Zhang; Zhaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Yunli Zhao; Miao Yu; Zhiguo Yu
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.598

2.  Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (DLLME) and LC-MS/MS Analysis for Multi-Mycotoxin in Rice Bran: Method Development, Optimization and Validation.

Authors:  Sofiyatul Akmal Salim; Rashidah Sukor; Mohd Nazri Ismail; Jinap Selamat
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  HILIC-MRM-MS for Linkage-Specific Separation of Sialylated Glycopeptides to Quantify Prostate-Specific Antigen Proteoforms.

Authors:  Yuri E M van der Burgt; Kasper M Siliakus; Christa M Cobbaert; L Renee Ruhaak
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Simultaneous Analysis of Fenthion and Its Five Metabolites in Produce Using Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jonghwa Lee; Jeong-Han Kim
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.