Literature DB >> 24293571

Update of strategies to translate evidence from cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews for use by various audiences.

Tamara Rader1, Jordi Pardo Pardo, Dawn Stacey, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Lara J Maxwell, Vivian A Welch, Jasvinder A Singh, Rachelle Buchbinder, France Légaré, Nancy Santesso, Karine Toupin April, Annette M O'Connor, George A Wells, Tania M Winzenberg, Renea Johnston, Peter Tugwell.   

Abstract

For rheumatology research to have a real influence on health and well-being, evidence must be tailored to inform the decisions of various audiences. The Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group (CMSG), one of 53 groups of the not-for-profit international Cochrane Collaboration, prepares, maintains, and disseminates systematic reviews of treatments for musculoskeletal diseases. While systematic reviews provided by the CMSG fill a major gap in meeting the need for high-quality evidence syntheses, our work does not end at the completion of a review. The term "knowledge translation" (KT) refers to the activities involved in bringing research evidence to various audiences in a useful form so it can be used to support decision making and improve practices. Systematic reviews give careful consideration to research methods and analysis. Because the review is often long and detailed, the clinically relevant results may not be apparent or in the optimal form for use by patients and their healthcare practitioners. This paper describes 10 formats, many of them new, for ways that evidence from Cochrane Reviews can be translated with the intention of meeting the needs of various audiences, including patients and their families, practitioners, policy makers, the press, and members of the public (the "5 Ps"). Current and future knowledge tools include summary of findings tables, patient decision aids, plain language summaries, press releases, clinical scenarios in general medical journals, frequently asked questions (Cochrane Clinical Answers), podcasts, Twitter messages, Journal Club materials, and the use of storytelling and narratives to support continuing medical education. Future plans are outlined to explore ways of improving the influence and usefulness of systematic reviews by providing results in formats suitable to our varied audiences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARTHRITIS; DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; IMPLEMENTATION; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24293571     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.121307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  7 in total

1.  Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research.

Authors:  Marlene Stoll; Martin Kerwer; Klaus Lieb; Anita Chasiotis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Preferences of Knowledge Users for Two Formats of Summarizing Results from Systematic Reviews: Infographics and Critical Appraisals.

Authors:  Katelynn Crick; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bursting out of our bubble: using creative techniques to communicate within the systematic review process and beyond.

Authors:  Jo Thompson Coon; Noreen Orr; Liz Shaw; Harriet Hunt; Ruth Garside; Michael Nunns; Alke Gröppel-Wegener; Becky Whear
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  To tweet or not to tweet about schizophrenia systematic reviews (TweetSz): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mahesh Jayaram; Angelique Y M Bodart; Stephanie Sampson; Sai Zhao; Alan A Montgomery; Clive E Adams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Tweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C E Adams; M Jayaram; A Y M Bodart; S Sampson; S Zhao; A A Montgomery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Social Media for the Dissemination of Cochrane Child Health Evidence: Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Michele P Dyson; Amanda S Newton; Kassi Shave; Robin M Featherstone; Denise Thomson; Aireen Wingert; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer A Boyko; Barbara L Riley; Cameron D Willis; Lisa Stockton; Dana Zummach; Jon Kerner; Kerry Robinson; Marie Chia
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.