Remo Ostini1, Therese Kairuz. 1. School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, 4305, Australia, r.ostini@uq.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low health literacy is expected to be associated with medication non-adherence and early research indicated that this might be the case. Further research suggested that the relationship may be more equivocal. AIM OF THE REVIEW: The goal of this paper is initially to clarify whether there is a clear relationship between health literacy and non-adherence. Additionally, this review aims to identify factors that may influence that relationship and ultimately to better understand the mechanisms that may be at work in the relationship. METHOD: English language original research or published reviews of health literacy and non-adherence to orally administered medications in adults were identified through a search of four bibliographic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBSCO Health). RESULTS: The search protocol produced 78 potentially relevant articles, of which 16 articles addressed factors that contribute to non-adherence and 24 articles reported on the results of research into the relationship between non-adherence and health literacy. Factors that contribute to non-adherence can be categorised into patient related factors, including patient beliefs; medication related factors; logistical factors; and factors around the patient-provider relationship. Of the 23 original research articles that investigated the relationship between non-adherence and health literacy, only five reported finding clear evidence of a relationship, four reported mixed results and 15 articles reported not finding the expected relationship. Research on possible mechanisms relating health literacy to non-adherence suggest that disease and medication knowledge are not sufficient for addressing non-adherence while self-efficacy is an important factor. Other findings suggest a possible U-shaped relationship between non-adherence and health literacy where people with low health literacy are more often non-adherent, largely unintentionally; people with moderate health literacy are most adherent; and people with high health literacy are somewhat non-adherent, sometimes due to intentional non-adherence. CONCLUSION: It is clear that relevant research generally fails to find a significant relationship between non-adherence and health literacy. A U-shaped relationship between these two conditions would explain why linear statistical tests fail to identify a relationship across all three levels of health literacy. It can also account for the conditions under which both positive and negative relationships may be found.
BACKGROUND: Low health literacy is expected to be associated with medication non-adherence and early research indicated that this might be the case. Further research suggested that the relationship may be more equivocal. AIM OF THE REVIEW: The goal of this paper is initially to clarify whether there is a clear relationship between health literacy and non-adherence. Additionally, this review aims to identify factors that may influence that relationship and ultimately to better understand the mechanisms that may be at work in the relationship. METHOD: English language original research or published reviews of health literacy and non-adherence to orally administered medications in adults were identified through a search of four bibliographic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBSCO Health). RESULTS: The search protocol produced 78 potentially relevant articles, of which 16 articles addressed factors that contribute to non-adherence and 24 articles reported on the results of research into the relationship between non-adherence and health literacy. Factors that contribute to non-adherence can be categorised into patient related factors, including patient beliefs; medication related factors; logistical factors; and factors around the patient-provider relationship. Of the 23 original research articles that investigated the relationship between non-adherence and health literacy, only five reported finding clear evidence of a relationship, four reported mixed results and 15 articles reported not finding the expected relationship. Research on possible mechanisms relating health literacy to non-adherence suggest that disease and medication knowledge are not sufficient for addressing non-adherence while self-efficacy is an important factor. Other findings suggest a possible U-shaped relationship between non-adherence and health literacy where people with low health literacy are more often non-adherent, largely unintentionally; people with moderate health literacy are most adherent; and people with high health literacy are somewhat non-adherent, sometimes due to intentional non-adherence. CONCLUSION: It is clear that relevant research generally fails to find a significant relationship between non-adherence and health literacy. A U-shaped relationship between these two conditions would explain why linear statistical tests fail to identify a relationship across all three levels of health literacy. It can also account for the conditions under which both positive and negative relationships may be found.
Authors: Lee A Lindquist; Lise Go; Jori Fleisher; Nelia Jain; Elisha Friesema; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: William L Holzemer; Suzanne Bakken; Carmen J Portillo; Richard Grimes; Jennifer Welch; Dean Wantland; Joseph T Mullan Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Amy M Bauer; Dean Schillinger; Melissa M Parker; Wayne Katon; Nancy Adler; Alyce S Adams; Howard H Moffet; Andrew J Karter Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: R J Fredericksen; L Gibbons; S Brown; T C Edwards; F M Yang; E Fitzsimmons; K Alperovitz-Bichell; M Godfrey; A Wang; A Church; C Gutierrez; E Paez; L Dant; S Loo; M Walcott; M J Mugavero; K Mayer; W C Mathews; D L Patrick; P K Crane; H M Crane Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2017-06-20
Authors: Lisa N Mansfield; Elijah O Onsomu; Elizabeth Merwin; Naomi M Hall; Alfreda Harper-Harrison Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Bas Geboers; Julii S Brainard; Yoon K Loke; Carel J M Jansen; Charlotte Salter; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Andrea F de Winter; Andrea F deWinter Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.295