Literature DB >> 24293326

Does the type of fluid affect rapidity of shock reversal in an anaesthetized-piglet model of near-fatal controlled haemorrhage? A randomized study.

C Roger1, L Muller2, P Deras3, G Louart1, E Nouvellon4, N Molinari5, L Goret6, J C Gris7, J Ripart1, J E de La Coussaye1, J Y Lefrant1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal resuscitation fluid for the early treatment of severe bleeding patients remains highly debated. The objective of this experimental study was to compare the rapidity of shock reversal with lactated Ringer (LR) or hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 at the early phase of controlled haemorrhagic shock. To assess the influence of vascular permeability in this model, we measured plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels during the experiment.
METHODS: Thirty-six anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated piglets were bled (<30 ml kg(-1)) to hold mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 40 mm Hg for more than 30 min and were resuscitated in two randomized groups: LR (n=14) or HES (n=14) at 1 ml kg(-1) min(-1) until MAP reached its baseline value of ±10%. MAP was maintained at its baseline value for 1 h. The time and fluid volume necessary to restore the baseline MAP value were measured.
RESULTS: The time to restore the baseline MAP value of ±10% was significantly lower in the HES group (P<0.001). During the initial resuscitation phase, the infused volume was 279 (119) ml in the HES group and 1011 (561) ml in the LR group (P<0.0001). During the stabilization phase, the infused volume was 119 (124) ml in the HES group and 541 (506) ml in the LR group. Biological data and plasma VEGF levels were similar between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of MAP was four times faster with HES than with LR in the early phase of controlled haemorrhagic shock. However, there was no evidence of increased vascular permeability.
© The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bleeding; laboratory animal model; resuscitation; shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24293326     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  5 in total

1.  Blood biochemical changes in pigs after infusion with acetate-buffered or lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions.

Authors:  Claudia Keibl; Wolfgang Sipos; Martin Ponschab; Christoph J Schlimp
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  Resuscitation with centhaquin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 improves survival in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock: a randomized experimental study.

Authors:  Zinais Kontouli; Chryssoula Staikou; Nicoletta Iacovidou; Ioannis Mamais; Evaggelia Kouskouni; Apostolos Papalois; Panagiotis Papapanagiotou; Anil Gulati; Athanasios Chalkias; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Fluid resuscitation practice patterns in intensive care units of the USA: a cross-sectional survey of critical care physicians.

Authors:  Timothy E Miller; Martin Bunke; Paul Nisbet; Charles S Brudney
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-16

4.  Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers.

Authors:  Solomon Aronson; Paul Nisbet; Martin Bunke
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-19

5.  Successful Resuscitation in a Model of Asphyxia and Hemorrhage to Test Different Volume Resuscitation Strategies. A Study in Newborn Piglets After Transition.

Authors:  Marc R Mendler; Stephan Schwarz; Lisbeth Hechenrieder; Steven Kurth; Birte Weber; Severin Höfler; Miriam Kalbitz; Benjamin Mayer; Helmut D Hummler
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.