Literature DB >> 24293166

Biomarkers of myocardial injury with different energy sources for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Michela Casella, Antonio Dello Russo, Eleonora Russo1, Ghaliah Al-Mohani, Pasquale Santangeli, Stefania Riva, Gaetano Fassini, Massimo Moltrasio, Ester Innocenti, Daniele Colombo, Fabrizio Bologna, Gennaro Izzo, Joseph G Gallinghouse, Luigi Di Biase, Andrea Natale, Claudio Tondo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to compare acute myocardial injury biomarker rise after atrial fibrillation ablation performed with different technologies. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were treated with pulmonary vein isolation with 4 different technologies: open-irrigated tip radiofrequency (RF) catheter in35 patients (Group A), cryoballoon in 35 patients (Group B), visually guided laser balloon in 20 patients (Group C), open-irrigated tip RF catheter with contact-force-sensing technology in 20 patients (Group D). Post-procedure samples of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB) were collected at 19 ± 3 h and 43 ± 3 h after ablation. At the first postprocedural sample, cTnI and CK-MB levels were found elevated in all 110 patients with a median value of 2.11 ng/mL and 8.95 ng/mL, respectively. Group B showed cTnI levels increased (median 5.96 ng/mL) compared to other groups (median Group A: 1.72 ng/mL, Group C: 1.54 ng/mL, Group D: 2.0 ng/mL; p < 0.001). Also CK-MB levels resulted higher in cryoablation (median 26.4 ng/mL) compared to other groups (median Group A: 6.40 ng/mL, Group C: 7.15 ng/mL, Group D: 6.50 ng/mL; p < 0.001). No significant association was observed between biomarker levels and recurrences of atrial fibrillation after a mean follow-up of 369 ± 196 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Highest markers for myocardial injury were observed in the cryoballoon group. It is possible that a longer delivery energy duration and other factors affecting lesion size resulted in higher amount of cardiac injury in cryoablation. The higher levels of cardiac biomarkers did not translate into a better outcome and its physiologic significance is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24293166     DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  16 in total

1.  Dissociated pulmonary vein activity after cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kenichi Tokutake; Michifumi Tokuda; Seiichiro Matsuo; Ryota Isogai; Kenichi Yokoyama; Mika Kato; Ryohsuke Narui; Shinichi Tanigawa; Seigo Yamashita; Satoru Miyanaga; Michihiro Yoshimura; Teiichi Yamane
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Aptamer-Based Microfluidic Electrochemical Biosensor for Monitoring Cell-Secreted Trace Cardiac Biomarkers.

Authors:  Su Ryon Shin; Yu Shrike Zhang; Duck-Jin Kim; Ahmad Manbohi; Huseyin Avci; Antonia Silvestri; Julio Aleman; Ning Hu; Tugba Kilic; Wendy Keung; Martina Righi; Pribpandao Assawes; Hani A Alhadrami; Ronald A Li; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser balloon and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Wei; Ning Zhang; Qi Jin; Wenqi Pan; Yucai Xie; Kang Chen; Tianyou Ling; Changjian Lin; Yangyang Bao; Qingzhi Luo; Chaofan Xing; Liqun Wu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Impact of Contact Force Technology on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Shurrab; Luigi Di Biase; David F Briceno; Anna Kaoutskaia; Saleem Haj-Yahia; David Newman; Ilan Lashevsky; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Eugene Crystal
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Prediction of mid-term outcome after cryo-balloon ablation of atrial fibrillation using post-procedure high-sensitivity troponin level.

Authors:  Tolga Aksu; Sukriye Ebru Golcuk; Tümer Erdem Guler; Kivanç Yalin; Ismail Erden
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.167

6.  The lesion characteristics assessed by LGE-MRI after the cryoballoon ablation and conventional radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Jun Kurose; Kunihiko Kiuchi; Koji Fukuzawa; Shumpei Mori; Hirotoshi Ichibori; Hiroki Konishi; Yayoi Taniguchi; Kiyohiro Hyogo; Hiroshi Imada; Hideya Suehiro; Yu-Ichi Nagamatsu; Tomomi Akita; Makoto Takemoto; Ken-Ichi Hirata; Shinsuke Shimoyama; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Tatsuya Nishii; Noriyuki Negi; Katsusuke Kyotani
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-01-13

7.  Impact of contact force technology on reducing the recurrence and major complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianhui Zhou; Wenkui Lv; Wenhui Zhang; Yuanzheng Ye; Yaodong Li; Qina Zhou; Qiang Xing; Jianghua Zhang; Yanmei Lu; Ling Zhang; Hongli Wang; Wen Qin; Baopeng Tang
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T delta concentration after repeat pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Ivan Zeljkovic; Sven Knecht; Florian Spies; Tobias Reichlin; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Michael Kühne; Christian Sticherling
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  High-sensitive cardiac troponin T as a predictor of efficacy and safety after pulmonary vein isolation using focal radiofrequency, multielectrode radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation catheter.

Authors:  Ivan Zeljkovic; Sven Knecht; Nikola Pavlovic; Umut Celikyrut; Florian Spies; Sarah Burri; Dominik Mannhart; Loris Peterhans; Tobias Reichlin; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kuhne
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-04-20

10.  The immediate trends in atrial electrical remodeling for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation across different modes of catheter ablation.

Authors:  Qian Hou; Liang Feng; Jing Yang; Yue Liu; Ling You; Lianxia Wang; Yan Zhang; Qian Liu; Yuliang Zhao; Ruiqin Xie
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.