Literature DB >> 24292364

Convergent and contingent community responses to grass source and dominance during prairie restoration across a longitudinal gradient.

Ryan P Klopf1, Sara G Baer, David J Gibson.   

Abstract

Restoring prairie on formerly cultivated land begins by selecting propagule seed sources and the diversity of species to reintroduce. This study examined the effects of dominant grass propagule source (cultivar vs. non-cultivar) and sown propagule diversity (grass:forb sowing ratio) on plant community structure. Two field experiments were established in Kansas and Illinois consisting of identical split plot designs. Dominant grass source was assigned as the whole-plot factor, and sown dominance of grasses (five levels of seeded grass dominance) as the subplot factor. Species density, cover, and diversity were quantified for 5 years. The effect of dominant grass source on the cover of focal grasses, sown species, and volunteer species was contingent upon location, with variation between dominant grass sources observed exclusively in Kansas. Species density and diversity showed regionally convergent patterns in response to dominant grass source. Contrary to our hypotheses, total species density and diversity were not lower in the presence of grass cultivars, the grass source we had predicted would be more competitive. Sown grass dominance effects on the cover of the focal grass species were contingent upon location resulting from establishment corresponding better to the assigned treatments in Illinois. All other cover groups showed regionally convergent patterns, with lower cover of volunteers and higher cover of sown forbs, diversity, and species density in the lowest sown grass dominance treatment in both sites. Thus, decisions regarding the diversity of propagules to reintroduce had more consequence for plant community structure than cultivar or non-cultivar source of dominant grasses.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292364     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0209-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency.

Authors:  Travis E Huxman; Melinda D Smith; Philip A Fay; Alan K Knapp; M Rebecca Shaw; Michael E Loik; Stanley D Smith; David T Tissue; John C Zak; Jake F Weltzin; William T Pockman; Osvaldo E Sala; Brent M Haddad; John Harte; George W Koch; Susan Schwinning; Eric E Small; David G Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Diversity-function relationships changed in a long-term restoration experiment.

Authors:  James M Doherty; John C Callaway; Joy B Zedler
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history.

Authors:  Stephen T Jackson; Richard J Hobbs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  High richness and dense seeding enhance grassland restoration establishment but have little effect on drought response.

Authors:  Daniel L Carter; John M Blair
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Evidence of spatial genetic structure in a California bunchgrass population.

Authors:  Andrew R Dyer; Kevin J Rice
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Plant community responses to resource availability and heterogeneity during restoration.

Authors:  S G Baer; J M Blair; S L Collins; A K Knapp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Contingency in ecosystem but not plant community response to multiple global change factors.

Authors:  Mark A Bradford; Stephen A Wood; Fernando T Maestre; James F Reynolds; Robert J Warren
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential.

Authors:  Linda M Broadhurst; Andrew Lowe; David J Coates; Saul A Cunningham; Maurice McDonald; Peter A Vesk; Colin Yates
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  No effect of seed source on multiple aspects of ecosystem functioning during ecological restoration: cultivars compared to local ecotypes of dominant grasses.

Authors:  Sara G Baer; David J Gibson; Danny J Gustafson; Allison M Benscoter; Lewis K Reed; Ryan E Campbell; Ryan P Klopf; Jason E Willand; Ben R Wodika
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.